QUOTE(gamenoob @ Mar 14 2025, 11:33 AM)
The best outcome is of course not touching the capital, just withdraw below the dividend rate so the capital remain flat or even growing.
When kaput, that goes to the beneficiaries.
Why we aim for such is because inflation are getting higher and future health cost is even steeper. Just being conservative .. that’s all.
so when the kids grown up they dont earn a living yet depends on the FAMA bank to feed them??? ( i wish i can...

) then after sometime they will leave you behind and move on right??? by that time you will have double the cash you have to survive (the 2+2 case)... dont tell me that you need to feed them until the day you gone and maybe feed their BF/GF also... if that is the case u really need more than 13m just to survive...
sorry ya, to me the kids are the kids they need to learn to survive, dont keep feeding them, teach them how to fish instate... and i belief most of us do have a house... by the time u gone they will not stay in your house anymore means there is more 'money' for them right???
yaya to save as much as possible but not to the extend like 1.3m is peanut, infact alot of people who have retired with even less than 13k with them...
end of the day is a choice, what you want... continue to stay in a 3000sf bungalow with only 2 head count or go round the world while you still can walk...
This post has been edited by confusedway: Mar 14 2025, 11:49 AM