Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Is this photo real? How to take this type of photo

views
     
SUSvkeong
post Jun 1 2007, 06:07 PM, updated 19y ago

47 yr old unker
*******
Senior Member
2,614 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
taken from smashpop.net

user posted image

Interested to know if this type of photo is real? because is it possible to take a photo with such nice skies?

and any pros here know how to take a photo like this? i want to learn

thanks
??!!
post Jun 1 2007, 06:11 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,548 posts

Joined: May 2005
Learn PP smile.gif
SUSvkeong
post Jun 1 2007, 06:13 PM

47 yr old unker
*******
Senior Member
2,614 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(??!! @ Jun 1 2007, 06:11 PM)
Learn PP  smile.gif
*
what is PP?
clemong_888
post Jun 1 2007, 06:14 PM

どんど晴れ
*******
Senior Member
2,502 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Kuching,Kuala Lumpur, Gifu,Japan


post processing. High Dynamic Range technique. there are a few ways to get this kinda photos even without pp.
gregy
post Jun 1 2007, 06:14 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
411 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


There's only so much that post processing can do, especially if you don't shoot raw. My suggestion is to get either a circular polarizer or grey graduated filter to reduce the exposure latitude between the sky and main subject. And shoot raw of course!

Cheers.


QUOTE(vkeong @ Jun 1 2007, 06:07 PM)
taken from smashpop.net

user posted image

Interested to know if this type of photo is real? because is it possible to take a photo with such nice skies?

and any pros here know how to take a photo like this? i want to learn

thanks
*

Added on June 1, 2007, 6:16 pmAnd btw that shot isn't a true HDR image anyways, cos HDR shots have almost no blown highlights, while this one has a lot of the sky a pure white. Good try, but not that great



QUOTE(gregy @ Jun 1 2007, 06:14 PM)
There's only so much that post processing can do, especially if you don't shoot raw. My suggestion is to get either a circular polarizer or grey graduated filter to reduce the exposure latitude between the sky and main subject. And shoot raw of course!

Cheers.
*
This post has been edited by gregy: Jun 1 2007, 06:16 PM
SUSvkeong
post Jun 1 2007, 06:16 PM

47 yr old unker
*******
Senior Member
2,614 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
so this photo is real after all? just was post processed using RAW format?

My camera does not support RAW.. does that mean I cannot take this kinda of pictures already?

thanks again
clemong_888
post Jun 1 2007, 06:20 PM

どんど晴れ
*******
Senior Member
2,502 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Kuching,Kuala Lumpur, Gifu,Japan


just google high dynamic range, u'll get everything u need to know.
greyPJ
post Jun 1 2007, 06:40 PM

artificially stupid
*******
Senior Member
3,169 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
looks like pano, take 3 pic in portrait so that the sky is covered, then use a program to stitche them together.
chucky
post Jun 1 2007, 06:49 PM

Urang Sabah
******
Senior Member
1,072 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: KK


Its more like stacking them on top of one another using different grades of transparency.
SUSvkeong
post Jun 1 2007, 07:32 PM

47 yr old unker
*******
Senior Member
2,614 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
thanks for the replies

another question.. is my canon S3IS good enough to be able to take this type of photos? if yes means I am just noob with a good weapon
calvin_gsc
post Jun 1 2007, 08:02 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
10,261 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


I thought this kinda shot can be possible with High F stop but high shutter speed?

I was just shooting the skies. It's blue right?

user posted image

F25 and 1/1600 shutter speed.

user posted image

F3.8 and 1/2000 shutter speed.

This post has been edited by calvin_gsc: Jun 1 2007, 08:04 PM
chucky
post Jun 1 2007, 08:24 PM

Urang Sabah
******
Senior Member
1,072 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: KK


Yes, those can make the sky turnout nicely, but buildings and things on the ground will be dark.

So if buildings are to be nicely exposed as well, not in darkness, then you need to take pics using filters or edit several pictures together.

This post has been edited by chucky: Jun 1 2007, 08:27 PM
nairud
post Jun 1 2007, 08:48 PM

One Leg Kick Ultra
Group Icon
Staff
7,529 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
is smashpop ok with you using his pic here?
calvin_gsc
post Jun 1 2007, 09:31 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
10,261 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(nairud @ Jun 1 2007, 08:48 PM)
is smashpop ok with you using his pic here?
*
Well, I think it should be ok, since he has his "copyright" watermark there. People would know it's his work of art. wink.gif
DaIdiot
post Jun 1 2007, 09:34 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,028 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: KL



CPL with Post processing smile.gif

your S3IS might be able to manage...
calvin_gsc
post Jun 1 2007, 09:49 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
10,261 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


I think this guide is not bad.

http://backingwinds.blogspot.com/2006/10/h...hdr-images.html
LittleLinnet
post Jun 1 2007, 09:59 PM

Iophobia
*******
Senior Member
3,593 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: ***Penang***
QUOTE(vkeong @ Jun 1 2007, 06:16 PM)
so this photo is real after all? just was post processed using RAW format?

My camera does not support RAW.. does that mean I cannot take this kinda of pictures already?

thanks again
*
You can do it with JPEG as well
Just shoot with 3 different exposure, like -2EV, 0EV, +2EV

Aurora Boreali
post Jun 1 2007, 10:22 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
470 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(greyPJ @ Jun 1 2007, 06:40 PM)
looks like pano, take 3 pic in portrait so that the sky is covered, then use a program to stitche them together.
*
QUOTE(chucky @ Jun 1 2007, 06:49 PM)
Its more like stacking them on top of one another using different grades of transparency.
*
I don't know, my guess would be that this was taken using an ultra wide angle or fisheye lens. coupled with CPL or ND grad filter and shot in RAW, then post processed.

This post has been edited by Aurora Boreali: Jun 1 2007, 10:26 PM
clemong_888
post Jun 1 2007, 10:24 PM

どんど晴れ
*******
Senior Member
2,502 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Kuching,Kuala Lumpur, Gifu,Japan


QUOTE(LittleLinnet @ Jun 1 2007, 09:59 PM)
You can do it with JPEG as well
Just shoot with 3 different exposure, like -2EV, 0EV, +2EV
*
3 exposures not enough. 5-10 would be ideal.
SUSvkeong
post Jun 1 2007, 10:52 PM

47 yr old unker
*******
Senior Member
2,614 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(calvin_gsc @ Jun 1 2007, 09:49 PM)
Thanks!

If take 3 photos with different EV.. means gotta use tripod?



4 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0212sec    0.22    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 01:16 AM