LAPTOP OVERCLOCKING PT2, is tis proof u asked for? discuss
LAPTOP OVERCLOCKING PT2, is tis proof u asked for? discuss
|
|
May 31 2007, 12:27 PM, updated 19y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,114 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: East |
Weeks ago, I created a topic on Laptop Overclocking following my query on how safe is it to permanently overclock it (by enabling High Performance mode in BIOS) but i was scolded, mocked by several really uncivilised forummers saying how brainless i didnt even know wat i was talking abt- laptop overclocking? hell, the topic was even closed by the moderator. why the hell such a big fuss ACtually i dono whether laptop can oc onot but my last topic confirm me ppl don believe it can b done on laptop. if then, wht is tis i see below? Expected Processor Frequency: 1.50 GHz Reported Processor Frequency: 1.65 GHz Expected System Bus Frequency: 400 MHz Reported System Bus Frequency: 440 MHz Intel® Processor Identification Utility Version: 3.3.20061218 Time Stamp: 2007/05/14 07:57:09 Number of processors in system: 1 Current processor: #1 Cores per processor: 1 Processor Name: Intel® Pentium® M processor 715 1.50GHz Type: 0 Family: 6 Model: D Stepping: 6 Revision: 17 L1 Instruction Cache: 32 KB L1 Data Cache: 32 KB L2 Cache: 2 MB Packaging: µFCPGA/µFCBGA EIST: Yes MMX: Yes SIMD: Yes SIMD2: Yes SIMD3: No Enhanced Halt State: No Execute Disable Bit: No Hyper-Threading Technology: No Intel® Extended Memory 64 Technology: No Intel® Virtualization Technology: No Expected Processor Frequency: 1.50 GHz Reported Processor Frequency: 1.65 GHz Expected System Bus Frequency: 400 MHz Reported System Bus Frequency: 440 MHz ************************************************************* actually, by the small 10% increase, i don think its worth the risk. Too small an increment for a cost. ive a few photos to back tis but ive to learn how to post a image lol |
|
|
|
|
|
May 31 2007, 12:35 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,114 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: East |
normal.jpg is before i enable the high performance option in the bios while the other is after i enabled it.[attachmentid=239960][attachmentid=239961]
|
|
|
May 31 2007, 12:44 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,221 posts Joined: Feb 2006 |
QUOTE(wayfeel @ May 31 2007, 12:27 PM) Weeks ago, I created a topic on Laptop Overclocking following my query on how safe is it to permanently overclock it (by enabling High Performance mode in BIOS) but i was scolded, mocked by several really uncivilised forummers saying how brainless i didnt even know wat i was talking abt- laptop overclocking? hell, the topic was even closed by the moderator. why the hell such a big fuss Laptop no oc alrdy so hot..if oc will burnt u noe?And dun expect can get oc from notebook hardware..becuz they not designed for oc.ACtually i dono whether laptop can oc onot but my last topic confirm me ppl don believe it can b done on laptop. if then, wht is tis i see below? Expected Processor Frequency: 1.50 GHz Reported Processor Frequency: 1.65 GHz Expected System Bus Frequency: 400 MHz Reported System Bus Frequency: 440 MHz Intel(R) Processor Identification Utility Version: 3.3.20061218 Time Stamp: 2007/05/14 07:57:09 Number of processors in system: 1 Current processor: #1 Cores per processor: 1 Processor Name: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 715 1.50GHz Type: 0 Family: 6 Model: D Stepping: 6 Revision: 17 L1 Instruction Cache: 32 KB L1 Data Cache: 32 KB L2 Cache: 2 MB Packaging: µFCPGA/µFCBGA EIST: Yes MMX: Yes SIMD: Yes SIMD2: Yes SIMD3: No Enhanced Halt State: No Execute Disable Bit: No Hyper-Threading Technology: No Intel(R) Extended Memory 64 Technology: No Intel(R) Virtualization Technology: No Expected Processor Frequency: 1.50 GHz Reported Processor Frequency: 1.65 GHz Expected System Bus Frequency: 400 MHz Reported System Bus Frequency: 440 MHz ************************************************************* actually, by the small 10% increase, i don think its worth the risk. Too small an increment for a cost. ive a few photos to back tis but ive to learn how to post a image lol |
|
|
May 31 2007, 02:33 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,810 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
Well not having seen the original thread I cant say what was the nature of the flaming you received but you've obviously proven that it is POSSIBLE. Though safe or not is another story. Meh.....but I think you shouldnt really bother about oc-ing with a laptop
|
|
|
May 31 2007, 03:39 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,114 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: East |
meh...
i jus try to prove tht lappie can oc thts all. cus some stubbornheads deadsure lappi to oc is impossibal meh, even the moderatorr think i wasting my blardy tim, i tink i am. uhm, my lappi not hot eh amazing venti so still can oc...i js feel is not worth trying for dat 10% up oni...huhu |
|
|
May 31 2007, 08:32 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,539 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: LocOmoT|oN.L0co|oti0N |
Not to encouraging u, but if u willing to clock it, pls share some result and screenie with o'c kaki here
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 1 2007, 05:52 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
971 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Penang |
|
|
|
Jun 1 2007, 11:56 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#8
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
well. yes u have overclocked. but what about the other fundamentals like stability and heat?
|
|
|
Jun 1 2007, 04:31 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
|
Staff
10,459 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: Puchong |
I do overclock my laptop last time. Default frequency is 1.60GHz. Highest stable clock reached is 2.0GHz; 1.036V. Temperature of processor reached 89C. Fan duty is 80%, as reported by embedded controller. It was way too hot and noisy to be turned on all day long.
My usual everyday clock is 1.76GHz@1.084V. Temperature reaches 84C at full load. Fan load is 50-60%, depending on room temperature. Makes lots of difference when folding. Slight increase in performance when gaming. Now, I'm back to default clock speed to reduce noise from fan. 1.60GHz@ 1.036V. Temperature is about 69 to 76C. IMHO, I think it's not really worth to overclock a laptop. It produces a lot more of heat, for a small increase of performance. |
|
|
Jun 1 2007, 08:10 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
971 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Penang |
IMHO, overclocking laptops might be worthwhile if you need something done fast, but only for short stints (not for gaming though). The temp is scary man..low temp solder on components might even be starting to melt already..
|
|
|
Jun 1 2007, 08:37 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
128 posts Joined: Nov 2006 From: PeeJay |
can pda phone overclock?
|
|
|
Jun 1 2007, 08:38 PM
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Jun 1 2007, 08:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 1 2007, 09:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
971 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Penang |
QUOTE(junks6767 @ Jun 1 2007, 08:37 PM) Can, I've seen people do it on the web (google around). Usually will have much shorter battery life, and hardware modding is usually required, which voids warranty for sure. But sometimes its worth it-the few cases I've seen included a few low end PDA when OCed matched a high end PDA. |
|
|
Jun 1 2007, 09:01 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,222 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
overclocking ur lappy may kill ur sperm
|
|
|
Jun 1 2007, 09:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
913 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Ampang, Kuala Lumpur, Seremban... |
im not sure this considered as OC, but when i first bought my lapie Compaq V3119, there was an option in nVidia control panel to increase somethin's Mhz.... when i increased that, laptop default 1.6Ghz increases up to 2.0Ghz.
Im not OC guy, so i dun know how to check all the data n stuff... but one thing i noticed was temp was very very hot, n if i dun use cooler pad... there would be burning smell from the processor. after 2 days i set it back to 1.6 coz its still brand new half month old laptop. Now dun hav that option coz use Vista. |
|
|
Jun 1 2007, 09:16 PM
|
|
Staff
7,948 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Soviet Sarawak |
QUOTE(junks6767 @ Jun 1 2007, 08:37 PM) QUOTE(DaRkSyThE @ Jun 1 2007, 08:38 PM) yes, and can be easily donehowever, it eats too much batt and runs hot. and the extra speed gained serves no purpose, unless you can find an PPC software that overwhelms the 600+ Mhz advanced xScale Proc (with WMMX summore) edit: to get on topic, I have no idea why you sais ppl told you oc'ing a laptop is not possible. AFAIK, most alienware lappie are factory oc'ed and fairly new laptop can even be oc'ed easily but the trend for laptop is more to UNDERCLOCKING. it's soo famous now that Intel decided to lock the lowest voltage a normal mobile proc can run to avoid disrupting sales to its very expensive Ultra Low Voltage cpu's. underclocking will increase batt life significantly, which in mobile computing is paramount edit2: biggest challenge to laptop oc'ing is the temperature - due to the compact cooling feature, extensive cooling is not possible. heck, running a normal clocked proc at 60+C is considered normal in lappie. This post has been edited by lucifah: Jun 1 2007, 09:23 PM |
|
|
Jun 1 2007, 10:12 PM
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
ok i think there isnt much point for this thread.
thread closed. PM me if anything |
|
|
Jun 1 2007, 11:57 PM
|
|
Staff
7,948 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Soviet Sarawak |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0175sec
0.87
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 01:20 PM |