Direct lit is not better , it is just one of the methods LED-LCD TVs used to light up their screen.
If the technology is done right , the edge lit TV will just be as good as the direct lit .
If you think edge lit sucks , think again . Here's a hint : Sony X9300E
You are right about the edge-lit being thinner than direct lit TVs .
The TV brightness is largely attributes to the availability of an
adequate dimming system and
power budget of the said TV.
You mixed them up , most high end LED-LCD TVs on the market are direct lit , that's how they are able to implement full array Local dimming system into the TV which is usually more expensive . But
not all direct lit TV has F.A.L.D , there are also lower budget direct-lit TVs such as the 2017's Samsung entry level MU6100.
Edge-lit TVs are often criticized due to their dimming system which is limited to controlling the LED backlights from the edge , causing a whole column of the screen to brighten up unnecessarily . There are exception to this , such as the X930E / X940E I mentioned above . And they definitely are not dimmer than the direct-lit counterparts , X930E still is one of the brightest consumer TV to date .
As a result , there is no absolute advantage between both technology . One is not definitively better than the other .
If you are looking for bright TVs , you should refer to the actual reviews instead of being obsessed with a tech where most people don't exactly understand the difference.
im not able to compare them side by side, as no shops are putting them together. and reviews on these 2 tv are quite limited