Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Directlit vs edgelit, Which 1 is better?

views
     
Convael
post Aug 23 2018, 11:45 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,109 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(kyxxx @ Aug 23 2018, 10:53 AM)
you wanna compare the brightness?
basically direct-lit is better, but thicker as compare to edge-lit

however, with current tech and R&D trying to make both of them look similar, to me a normal consumer hardly can see the brightness difference
*
Direct lit is not better , it is just one of the methods LED-LCD TVs used to light up their screen.


If the technology is done right , the edge lit TV will just be as good as the direct lit .
If you think edge lit sucks , think again . Here's a hint : Sony X9300E

You are right about the edge-lit being thinner than direct lit TVs .


The TV brightness is largely attributes to the availability of an adequate dimming system and power budget of the said TV.


QUOTE
if you see most high end TV in the market, are edge-lit to maintain the thin frame


You mixed them up , most high end LED-LCD TVs on the market are direct lit , that's how they are able to implement full array Local dimming system into the TV which is usually more expensive . But not all direct lit TV has F.A.L.D , there are also lower budget direct-lit TVs such as the 2017's Samsung entry level MU6100.


Edge-lit TVs are often criticized due to their dimming system which is limited to controlling the LED backlights from the edge , causing a whole column of the screen to brighten up unnecessarily . There are exception to this , such as the X930E / X940E I mentioned above . And they definitely are not dimmer than the direct-lit counterparts , X930E still is one of the brightest consumer TV to date .


As a result , there is no absolute advantage between both technology . One is not definitively better than the other .
If you are looking for bright TVs , you should refer to the actual reviews instead of being obsessed with a tech where most people don't exactly understand the difference.

This post has been edited by Convael: Aug 23 2018, 11:55 AM
Convael
post Aug 23 2018, 12:08 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,109 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(logitechmouse @ Aug 23 2018, 11:58 AM)
at my case, im narrowing down my tv selections between these 2
sharp ua6800x (va, edge lit)
sony x7500f (ips, direct lit)

im not able to compare them side by side, as no shops are putting them together. and reviews on these 2 tv are quite limited
*
Unfortunately both of the TVs you mentioned have fairly limited brightness , they don't do very well vs strong glare from sunlights .


You have a few options , get a curtain or something to cover up the sunlights , or get a very bright TV ( which can be costly )
You will need something like a Q7FN ( 5-6k for 55 inches ) .

Or avoid watching TVs during the day ...

This post has been edited by Convael: Aug 23 2018, 12:14 PM
Convael
post Aug 25 2018, 08:38 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,109 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(Tech26 @ Aug 23 2018, 07:15 PM)
If the brightness too strong and watching for few hours continuous. Is it eyes will feel very tired?
*
Even if a TV is very bright , doesn't mean the TV will stay at its peak brightness forever .
It simply means the TV can better control its brightness output to make bright scenes & picture highlight stand out in the picture .

Most TV also has an eyecare setting if you find the picture too bright , or you can turn down the brightness .




 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0134sec    0.70    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 04:12 AM