I think most people or manufacturer care less for version, yes it's faster than 3.0 but most people already satisfied with QC3.0
I suspect QC4.0 charger are more expensive in terms of cost, as it require dual management IC, and USB-PD compatible. Maybe that's why many manufacturers still stick to QC3.0 

Personally I care only USB-PD, as it's universal standard AND can delivery much much higher power ( 100W to laptop    ), so that's the true one-charger-to-rule-them-all.

Yup, it's mainly due to licensing cost thus why we literally never see the latest QC standards even on the latest flagships and the reason why most manufacturers create their own specification on fast charging. Qualcomm charge a hefty sum to both mobile and accessory manufacturer if they wish to have QC implemented into their hardware.

In my book, OPPO's VOOC a.k.a. Dash Charge still have the best implementation thus far for fast charging on a mobile device but likewise it's completely proprietary just like Qualcomm's QC technology. 

It's all true, but manufacturer care about cost only    if little or no additional cost, sure all jump in QC4.0 

ehem*fruit-company didnt include fast charger in their latest expensive flagship, hell even cheapskate and pull out headphone jack adapter that cost few dollars only 

I dun care about QC, they should attached 5k mah battery
So i can caj during sleep at night only
UBL, twrp, custom rom

However there is plenty of doubts especially fast charging isn't good for the battery. It will degrade faster. True or not there isn't any proof yet. Anyway besides initial testing, I had refrained from using those Oppo fast charging,  VOCC charging. The normal QC2.0 is sufficiently good enough for me

charging is consider a hassle. If 1 charge can last 1 to 2 days that will be better than charging half an hour.

Actually doesnt matter. Because normal ppl sleep 8 hours a day so if can last a day or two you have 8 hours to charge so 30mins is only useful if you have a small capacity battery phone.

Ya ya we geddit, having super duper fast charging is amazing. But what to do if qualcomm or whatever the heck brand of fast charging decided to play hard to get? Just work around and slap a big ass battery lah, at least helps alot y'know? Leave it charge over night, it doesn't hurt to plug it in when you're resting or sleeping.

"Bla bla flagship need fasssst charging", poco is not a flagship, poco is a phone with decent 4000mah and decent charging speed. So teckyyang, maybe you will have more proper answers/replies if you  bring your vooc/qc5 6 7 8 desire to the correct section of thread

Oh yeah, you're right, it's about rm2-3k flagships. Right... Wait... Ain't we in a rm1.4k price range pocophone thread here? Hmmmm weird.

But hey, must have been awesome eh if pocophone has qc4 or vooc eh?

are you in manufacturer lines of business ? I don't think so … else you should know the answer.

You are too simple minded based on your arguments
BTW Poco is a CHEAP phone though it has high end specs. You sound as if the phone is high price??
Even high price Apple don't give you by default fast charging plug
All these boil down to individual company's business strategy
Other cheaper phones that gives you say faster charging doesn't necessary mean higher priced phones must follow??
Do you know how much Qualcomm charge for it's QC licence?? Company pricing will depend too on other factors too - marketing costs, production costs, QA costs etc. We don't know how they weighed these in their pricing strategy. You consider QC4 as important feature but does the manufacturer think similarly as you ?? I assumed you could still be studying and had zero experience in manufacturing??

Kindly highlight those videos. I have never heard of identical twins or people with similar faces bypass Face ID, at least not with the usual way of simply unlocking their phone with Face ID it's self.

Also it seem you are just muttering rubbish again, facial surgery will NOT grants you the same facial pattern and or the exact same unique identifier to another person you would want to look similar too, again keyword here is "similar" not a 1:1 ratio. There will always be discrepancies on a deeper level.

Facial recognition technology especially advanced ones will not simply scan your face on a human eye level but rather look into minute on your overall facial appearance, same thing with fingerprint and retina scanners. Those poor lower cost fingerprint scanners you see in most offices will just take partial prints for an exact or similar enough comparison while more costly advanced ones will scan and look into finer details like 3D mapping your entire set of prints along with the outline of your thumb, the former will easily be fooled, the latter not so unless the perpetrator have the in-depth technical knowledge, resources and time to do so.

Note9 sucks. And note9 speakers somehow feel and sound cheap compared to s9plus speakers. Samsung definately cut costs there.

Spen? Lol, nobody uses it nowadays. Probably use it a few times then its keptninside forever.

And btw curve screen is really not good. Difficult to hold and use.

Its nice to look at only. But not functional.

Btw i am using s9plus. Honestly, regret kaokao buy this phone.

Got kah?

Indoor lock within 10 seconds :

[attachmentid=10140158]

There's a setting to tweak. Day and night difference. Go settings find A-GPS settings, change the ip to supl.google.com

Used to not be able to play pokemon go without my phone keep losing GPS but after changing the settings, worked fine all the way.

Seems quite some issues with the phone?
Is it worth to buy now?

no poco f2 my friend
the redmi k20 pro is basically poco f1's next generation
as in, specs and price wise lah.

gooding phone, but if dont mind the notch then pocof1 still gooding bah

i got a new phone, and im still thinking whether to let go of my poco, its such a great phone. batttery still going strong despite sometimes charging overnight. camera still great as hell using gcam.