nope. with an ewallet that doesn charge convenience fee in the first place, then they have already think about how they going to absord the cc fees. but with SarawakPay, 'i think' it took a few rounds of proposal and survey, to get 'some agencies' agreed to subsidise the cc fees. you know every month these companies would have a meeting where they discuss new users registered, monthly usage, new merchants registered, i 'also think' one of the topics that brought recently is the sudden significant amount of withdrawal took place after they waive the cc fees. which, eventually someone must have kena blame in the meeting directly. e.g. 'fought so hard for cc fees to be waived, now people cashing out money from us'. just saying.
boost, bigpay - they are supported by big companies, airasia/axiata, maybe the cc fees peanuts for them - when they started and of course they have though they could absord it, which bigpay now also has agreed they cant!. sarawakpay is govt own under SMA, operated by a glc company, which a lot of workpapers required if they were to ask sma to fund/increase the current grant given to fund the cc topup fees.
they have a fixed amount of grant allocation per year, which they cant exceed, if significant portion of the grant is utilised to fund CC topup for abuser - then nothing left for sarawakian for real spending (for the cashback 6-7%) at end of the year, so again, if im part of the team, i would ban these abusers.
Again, since it is out in the open already, do it at your own risk. Don't let them caught you.
Not just bigpay can't afford, even boost also can't afford when they reduce the withdrawal limit per transaction to RM 200.. Same go to Gopayz which disallow usage of BP to reload