QUOTE(Simply_Ed @ Jul 31 2018, 08:58 PM)
Interesting thread to read.
First and most importantly, congrats to TS for getting engaged!
Next,
IMO I think TS is being crucified because she's improving herself not for it's - the activity - own sake but rather as a means to something else i.e. to attract rich men.
Quoted from the first post:
1) She reads finance and investment topics not for her own benefit but rather so that she "knows what to chat with them, and impress them";
2) Cooking and singing not because she enjoys it but again to not be an "empty vase".
3) Having high earning power not for herself but because "Men find rich/high-earning women attractive too, so be one."
Then she ended it with "
Lastly, love a man not for his money, but for his personality, his character, dreams and ambitions, and earning potential. The truly rich man is one who can lose everything, smile and start all over again, and earn the same pot of gold in a decade or two. Now that is what I call true wealth.
" ******
Thing is her underlying motive is already attracting "rich men" (however defined whether T20, M40), everything else is secondary so she literally just contradicted that entire conclusion.
All the guys she's listed are rich firstly. Once they've cleared that threshold then only does she looks at the personality, which is why she didn't settle for the the first couple of guys despite them being rich.
Because she identified being an over achieving strong independent woman, I would assume she wouldn't undermine herself by making money her primary concern when seeking a relationship. Also, since we're living in times of gender equality where it's not uncommon for females to earn considerably more than their male counterparts. So why can't the female become the main breadwinner instead of the male and the male becoming the househusband?
She isn't the typical gold digger with all the negative connotation that is attached to the label but she's undoubtedly looking for a man with money making the relationship contractual and transactional fundamentally. Of course, there is nothing wrong with that because she's entitled to her choice.
What people find off-putting, IMO is her stance of marrying someone primarily because of his riches let alone writing a "how to guide". From her tone of writing, I would agree she's an alpha female (being assertive). So why marry for riches if she herself can attain those riches and marry any man she wants, for example someone with a more noble goal who's poorer?
As many has pointed out, a compassionate, hardworking and genuine person won't necessarily be rich.
And I being a single male in my mid 20s hope that her stance isn't representative of the general female population. Although sometimes it does seem the case hence spawning the ever popular saying " Ada Wang Ada Amoi."
I strongly feel that if she worded her title " How to Marry your IDEAL Man" rather than rich, she wouldn't have gotten nearly as much shit.
Totally agree. You've said out what's in my mind. By the way, it sounds like she doesn't choose the earlier few guys, but the fact could be.. ppl have not decided to choose her either. Guys can pursue many girls, but that doesn't mean they see you as the right choice yet, as it take time to develop feeling and to understand a person.
By the way, I have a relative who is a PHD holder (with scholarship) in the same uni as hers. She was all along looks obedient and good girl until she have a bf (who work abroad and rich family in Malaysia). She started to use SK II and fragrance. It catches us by surprise as due to family having nose allergy history, fragrance never appear at home. She told us since bf offer to pay for her shopping, she wanted to start using it. And in 1 year, she suddenly own a few burberry, LV, etc... And of coz everytime trying to show off, will shut off by the rest of us by saying "Cheh! ppl's gift.. not buying it yourself.. no big deal"
She told us, she is the 1st choice of her MIL but later I found out her MIL actually did alot of tactics chase away her eldest son's gf, until finally he married a PHD scholar and then become uni lecturer, same as my relative. My relative's bf (now hubby) is 2nd son of the family, and he never bring any gf home other than my relative. For sure, his motive is to bring home a candidate that his mom want. Now after got married and have a baby (weak all time sick baby), the husband who used to promise that he will quit his job (overseas) after married, end up work in a local based company but require him to travel 75% of his time. And her MIL who used to promise to help her babysitting and suggest her to have 3 kids (as that time they don't have any grandchild and keep giving her all sort of guarantee, as the eldest DIL delay having bb). But once the news that they are going to get married, the eldest DIL immediately conceive (another smart 1). So the MIL actually happily bbsitting the eldest grandson, and rejecting to care for my relative's son. What I can say.. insincere ppl will bump into insincere ppl as well. You marry them with a motive, they will also have their motive.