I don't know why you guys are so upset over her statements. It's her right , it's her choice to do whatever she wants. Women do go for rich guys, it's just they are not expressed explicitly like her.

However the fact that since she mentioned that the relationship is transactional, it would imply that Ralna cannot complain and whine about the husband if the husband found someone prettier and better than her in the future. In her own words , if she becomes a liability and no longer in the game , then it is justified for her husband to dump her and she cannot complain about it.

You guys are getting too emotional. Her views actually benefit rich playboys cause now their wives cannot complain if the husbands find someone better and prettier than her.

This post has been edited by Drian: Jul 20 2018, 09:32 PM

I'm actually ok with her opinion.

She admits that she does go for money and she also agree that the husband can dump her anytime/have another mistress if she is old. In another words, she cannot complain or whine or gain sympathy when her husband have an affair or dump her for someone else. At least she's not being a hypocrite.


There are some women here on the other hand who has double standards, where they demand for the right to choose the type of guy that they want and they can dump the guy if they are not up to the standards, but then chastise guys who dump girls. In another words these girls are saying "we girls can choose who we like and dump them if they are not up to standard but you guys cannot do the same to girls or else we will label you as jerks/playboy."

It started because you warned them on their trolling, but now that they feel TS is doing the same, you did not warn her, and therefore showed biasness. It's less about your opinion on her.

It is not these days, it already has been happening a long time ago. Women would always find someone richer than them, and that is their right.
It's just that since they are working now, so naturally the "wealth criteria" would also naturally increase.

What I can't stand is, when they are no longer pretty or with bad attitude and all, if the guy dumps them, they get angry at the guy. They themselves won't settle for less BUT they expect the guys to be loyal to them even though her attractiveness has dropped. It's like they want to demand from the guys, but they don't allow the guys to demand anything form them.

Yes, if the girl behaves like in TS case wants to demand, she has to provide, and if she no longer can provide , the guy has the right to dump the woman.
In TS case, it's a transactional process and therefore cannot complain about it.

So , yes women who think like TS has every right to demand for rich guys but since it is transactional ,the rich guy can also demand the same from her.
If the guy goes poor of course, then she can dump him and vice versa.

You guys instead of exposing her, if you're smart enough , you use her own game/mindset/thought-process against her.

There was a post here back then with similar argument .

Women are blaming men for being intimidated by her title, but then she never blame herself for "rejecting men who are not intimidated by her title" or "rejecting men who are not up to her standards". It's women themselves that behave in a way that show that they would not settle for less and then blame the guys for not pursuing her.