Teadead

Rebrand back je to chatime. Lol

Last night still see the shop at the Curve opened.

Why? Must lipot pulis.

Close cause want go home.

Nope. The midvalley branch still alive and business as usual.

dont sell tea, sell coffee loh

Lel. Mana close. Counter like still serving. Only tukar decor je.btw I have yet to see an official news in the media about them losing the appeal court. Got link can share? Or just a cepat pancut/hoax kind of bodo?

manada? still open wat

report them for contempt of court la

http://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/loob...der-tealive-ops

Loob to appeal against halt order on Tealive ops

KUALA LUMPUR: Tealive owner and franchiser Loob Holding Sdn Bhd, which is in a legal dispute with Chatime bubble tea stores’ principal La Kaffa International Co Ltd, is now appealing to the apex court to reverse a ruling granted to La Kaffa to stop Loob from operating a competing business against Chatime for two years. This came after the Court of Appeal dismissed Loob’s application for a stay of the court’s decision on granting the injunction applied for by La Kaffa.

“The company (Loob) has instructed its lawyers to file for leave to appeal to the Federal Court against the Court of Appeal’s decision given on June 27, 2018, and it has been informed that the application was filed yesterday (Wednesday). Its lawyers have been further instructed to make the necessary application to the Federal Court to maintain [the] status quo and the said application was filed earlier this morning (yesterday),” Loob said in a statement.

La Kaffa, on the other hand, lauded the Court of Appeal’s decision, saying the verdict reflects Malaysia’s justice system on a positive note and would strengthen the confidence of more international franchisers to build trade ties in the country. La Kaffa also said it was mindful of the impact the court’s decision will have on the livelihood of the employees and outlet owners who will be directly affected by the injunction order.

Therefore, Chatime Malaysia managing director Aliza Ali said “within the scope allowed by the relevant law”, the company would welcome the return of former Chatime franchisees and employees.

“Our decision to allow affected outlets to return and re-operate under Chatime was made with regard to the overwhelming request in light of the recent injunction granted by the court. Our doors are open to the employees and outlet owners who have found themselves in this precarious position today. They are our priority at the moment,” said Aliza in a statement.

In his written judgement yesterday, Court of Appeal Judge Datuk Dr Hamid Sultan Abu Backer said the stay was sought pending the disposal of Loob’s application for leave to appeal to the Federal Court against the Court of Appeal’s order.

However, he said Loob’s affidavit did not state if there was an application for leave to appeal to the Federal Court, which was “fatal” to Loob’s stay application as there were no proceedings pending in the Federal Court to grant the stay.

The dismissal was also on the grounds that Loob’s act of changing the name of Chatime to Tealive had breached its contractual obligations to La Kaffa under their franchise agreement, as well as the country’s franchise law. Nevertheless, Hamid said the dismissal yesterday would not bar Loob from seeking a stay in the Federal Court.

This post has been edited by dagnarus: Jul 7 2018, 10:40 AM

tukar to talktime

He's appealing the appeal la. So still boleh bizness lel

have to close la

failed to get a stay of execution

Have to close then what's the authority doing...decision was 27th June some more, more than a week to close down already

which authority to enforce the close?

Since it's court order, then pulls got power Liao, so many divisions, maybe can selit under commercial crimea. Lel.

Nope. I've no idea.

The shop owner can just rebrand to tea makku. No need close. Tealive not own the shop.

Tealive close then just change name. Besides tealive does not own the shop.

sumhow they seem to get away so many times

dunno who is behind them

kepong village mall?

sampah drink

kolos no kolos oso makes no diff

Court sudah bagi judgement tapi tak nak patuhi. Dia ingat cash is king lagi ke , apa apa pun boleh bincang dengan wang!

Close lah cb

Mahkamah dah bagi arahan masih tak nak tutup

Sei sohai ah beng ni degil cam sial.

Chatime is small Ikan billis wanna swallow the hundred over TeaLive outlets?
Laugh me die!

Mr Loo should just negotiate and buy over a small Taiwanese bubble tea outfit and overnight change existing TeaLive to that.
Cheaper & straightforward.

The prob with tealive was the owner rebrand his outlets overnight while fighting for chatime brand... He should just close all his outlets for 1-2 months "rent" the outlets to shell company and start business again

Yup as shareholder in new company but not total owner.

Faster change branding again is it?

So they'll be like.. "huh? I dont own tealive why you making court case out of me?"

"My bubble tea brand is LoobLubeTea what.. since when tealive"

Basically trying to putar?

Dishonest disgrace of an owner. Yet still can gain macais to plotek.

Liek a small time BN

if have documents before the court case to prove then yes.

He also not allowed for bubble tea biz for 2 years
... rebrand pun tarak guna...

This post has been edited by dupreehere: Jul 7 2018, 11:18 AM

change to KopiLive

conlanfirm OK.

Rosmah?

Sole owner but as non majority share owner of a biz owned with other people should not be a problem.

This post has been edited by Phoenix_KL: Jul 7 2018, 11:20 AM

Dey you know what is putar2?

Same like our bn minister here putar with no logic

Janji SUCK ITTTTT

who is that 2 ppl? roboh ppl mia stall....

while the worker dont even give a fuk, continue sell tealie

however, without Loob Chatime is no one..... u hardly see any chatime outlets in taiwan and they are such a small bubble tea company out of hundred there..... i been there so many times and to be honest....i think i only see 1-2 times only....

if court ordered tealive to shutdown.... Loob just sell the brand to a shell company and let his wife become sole owner..... loob knows all the ingredients suppliers and recipes hence like it or not.... this fella is here to stay....

last time here in k full of loob die hard supporter, mana now

u cannot copyright drink/food here... look like chatime, taste like chatime but it's not chatime... LOL

Got others say don't taste like chatime.
Like watered down version.

Korek me if im wrong. Kenot rebrand cus the previous contract with Chatime said if you terminate the contract or breach the contract you kenot open the same business for x years. This tealive CEO signed this kind of contract and he breached it. Some more changed his kiosks all over malaysia to his own brand "Tealive". Now its "Teadead".

This post has been edited by clarifier04: Jul 7 2018, 11:36 AM

No leh...the owner of Chatime is La Kaffa...a public listed company in Taiwan...bigger than small player Tealive lah

Refer above.

Still open yesterday. Surprised by the very long queue a at the KL Sentral branch

Yesterday I passed by the wangsa maju branch.
Long queue. They offer buy 1 free 1 is it?

Ha ha ha ha physical outlets less la.
Not even famous in Taiwan.
Without overseas outlets they are small fry.
BTW b4 Malaysia accounts for more than 40% of their total outlets.

still it doesn't justify that loob can alter its ingredients without knowledges of consumers and chatime, to cut down cost.

its like mcd changed its burger patty to ramly patty without informing us.

i knw right...damn long queue thr..

la kaffa may public listed but the brand "chatime" is not popular and i only believe facts that i hardly see that in taipei and tai chung... public listed doesnt mean big and popular

Why some of ya defend loob.
He selling an alter version low quality of food at same cost.
Bodo like bn oppo mavai.

The contract only valid if both company operate in Taiwan
Overseas company cannot request local company to stop business

Most of the franchise contract are quite similar, when you sign agreement, you agree that you and your relative shall not establish similar business for x years. And this stupid Bryan try to ignore and thought his parents and in law parents connection and wealth can get Free Pass in Malaysia law.

i didnt say he was correct on that part... but the owner should know this will come sooner or later.... this is business..

You got read news bo?

this , i though his plan B are doing this
or just close for 1 week to change the logo and menu give new name restart again accept all the existing Tealive promo and privilege

why no one on internet go this ?

buy a similar burger from different country then put together to compare

inb4 Goldenarch sure say they get approval from HQ

What Bryan did with the lower quality ingredients is not right.

But he still has a lot of support as he is really good with what he does, and people like him too, in business if people like you they will do more for you. That goes for his customers as well. His mistake was to think he could outplay la kaffa by substituting ingredients.

This. Cannot go into similar business for N years. So, buying another small bubble tea company and change name also cannot.

Tealive looks better than chatime

ni mother russia punya mentality ka sukhoi
1 outlet in taiwan only
produce chill pack bubble tea and sell in convinient store (like HL milk)

wtf u lagi got bukti anot or simply blow one

this case in fact is like "Can malaysia employers stop their ex-staff from joining competitors although they sign the employment agreement stated they can't for N year"....


the agreement has more bark then bite....

use proxy open similar business loh

La Kaffa

1 shop in Taiwan only can do USD10mil per month sales? In any case, whether Chatime itself is that popular in Taiwan is not important. The point is La Kaffa is not a small outfit...it is definitely bigger than Tealive.

Tealive still survive? Ayam baru beli..

who knows maybe mcd allows their regional franchisees to use regional ingredients.

these all needs to approval from hq.

Ayam work part time promoter at mall today

Ayam still see people drinking tealive

haha true

The shop can strike off teive logo and continue operating??

Tealive should sell to proxy sure no issue

I think Tealive brand cannot use already. And, proxy must not be family members ... a question of trust is involved..easier said than done.

sei jor lanc owner hehe lawdretep

Good riddance! I only drink Starbucks

Dun care lah... they are in franchise business what..whether own sale or franchise money all also revenue lah... the point is they are not a "small" company like what people said earlier... they are bigger than Tealive... they are public listed co with 2.6b turnover

Mytown outlet still open yesterday

Pyramid outlet still open

Banyak orang line up to buy diabetes lottery

Tealive are not allowed to sell tea, so rebrand also no use.

Brian loo hidup lagi ja
Jangan gebang la

Dont plotek scammer la

Loo break contract with la kaffa
The end. Simple

People who dont abide contract that they themselves sign
Are shit
Worse than gangster
Worse than animal

c4 or tong simen

samseng betul

Ha ha ha ha you don't even read your link.
Bulk of the sales not from Chatime la.
Chatime brand sux.
Their other brand doing better.

Ya lor
As per contract
Loo cant open similar business like chatime

He did
Hence the court decided
So closed lor

Kena prison lor
What else

The point is La Kaffa is not a small outfit as people thought they were.

If they are gangster how come they didn't do anything to Loob?

Brian loo break contract
La kaffa the one evil gangster

Malaysian buat taik
Taiwan company jahat

Wth mentality
Plotek kuat sangat

Brian loo break contract, Taiwan gangster didn't break his legs?

Ya lor
If break his spine
Baru betul gangster

Ni la kaffa use proper channel
Use legal method
Send multiple letters

Civilized course of action

Unlike brian loo

maybe that's why his muka always nampak constipated hehe

Taiwan gangster end up more civilized than unethical shithead Brian Loo

can someone give me tldr version of why tealive cannot operate?

legally speaking they are using their own brand name and own tea taste (although similar but all bubble tea taste same no?) so why la kaffa can stop them from operating?

Because brian loo sign contract with la kaffa that he wont start similar business like chatime for certain amount of years

Hence why people been saying
He should let other peoples start tealive
Start new outlet in new place
While he settle his issue with la kaffa

But no. He converted his chatime outlet to tealive
Cari pasal
Of course kena lor

When did he signed it and why he signed it?
Anyway why dont he just "sell" his business to his sister/brother/mother/father/grandfather/grandmother and then they start tealive ?

that would loophole the contract i guess

When he first want to bring chatime to Malaysia
Why? Cuz he need chatime business la
Why else?

Cuz he bodo
Usually, those who breach contract memang iq level tenggiling

I guess he thought he could win the case coz apparently i hear la kaffa suddenly cancel contract before due date right?

No close yet. In Sabah.

Scammer do what scammer always do

Cant rationalize it

dai lan sei.

why you still side loob holding?

its very obvious loob did wrong.

so la kaffa cancel contract means la kaffa is wrong?

it is alright for loob to buy their cheap raw materials from unauthorised suppliers?

kena bryan brainwash and victim kard lettew