QUOTE(Showtime747 @ Sep 12 2018, 04:14 PM)
According to my hypothesis,
1. The person who does not contribute to the production of GDP, and become a net consumer of scarce resources of the society
2. The person who does not contribute to tax revenue of the country
3. The person who does not contribute to science progression / production efficiency by passing down his acquired knowledge from previous education and professional experience
4. In addition to that, I would go on to expand on the above 3 criteria to include the person
contribute lesser to the production of GDP than before RE,
pay lesser tax than before RE and
contribute lesser to science progression/production efficiency than before RE
It is not only "makan, tidur dan main"
For Benjamin Franklin, the "retirement at age 42" actually refers to "retirement from his printing business". In today's business term, we would say "exit from printing business and embark on another career". For the next 40 years, he went on to contribute to the field of science and invention, made remarkable contribution to his country for many important role/jobs, and eventually earned his picture on the US$100 bill. A great man in USA history
Should he really have the mindset of RE, the history would have lost such an important figure, and the history would be different.
For the young readers who have the mindset of RE, Benjamin Franklin is yet another example after Jack Ma that you could make great contribution to the society/country if you are not selfish
IMHO, selfishness is dependent on the reason for retiring and what one retiring to. RE is neutral and the retirement age is just a relative figure. For example, mr money mustache who RE in early 30+, he managed to inspire many ppl start FI journey and many of them in better financial position today. He actually make more impact and good for society in general compared to stick in 9-5 office job. Isn't it such opputunity occur due to his RE?
Criteria 4 sound odd to me, my interpretation is prior RE, one is contribute tax via both active + passive income, once letting go active income, taxable income definately lesser. Thus, for those who forey into other fields that his/her passionated with much lesser / without additional income, or fulltime charity work, I dont see these group of ppl should marked as selfish.
Again, isn't it Benjamin Franklin retired on his printing (primary job) and working on his own passion at 42. If he failed, he probably just a normal early retiree. If we see from another perspective, isn't it RE is actually a positive move where create opputunity for one maximize their potential? For sure, when he attempt forey into his scientific research, he meet your criteria 4.
The same Benjamin Franklin story, it can have different interpretion is view from another angle.
Probably you could see more interesting discussion from here too...
https://www.financialsamurai.com/the-dark-s...-risks-dangers/