QUOTE(Showtime747 @ Sep 9 2018, 03:13 PM)
For the young man and woman who have set their mind on FIRE, I would like to throw you guys and girls a bigger picture :
1. Retiring early at age 40 sounds nice.
2. But if you think beyond yourself, your plan has a significant impact on the economy, society and human advancement. Sounds exaggerating ?
3. In economics, RE means a person does not contribute to the production of GDP anymore. He no longer is a net contributor to the economy
4. He is now a net consumer of scarce resources of the economy
5. An economy needs new blood to support the old and young people. That’s why countries with aging population face economic issues (eg Japan). If everybody retires at 40s, the economy will collapse. Just imagine 50% of the population are retirees, with the other 50% produce necessities for everyone else.
6. If you don’t understand in macro-economics terms, then think of it from the taxation point of view. When more people retire early, the tax revenue of a country will reduce. If a country has less income, the economy as a whole will suffer. The government cannot afford public services and the society will be in chaos
7. We all know our EPF is a quasi-ponzi scheme. If there are no new contributors, it will collapse. Remember those who retire at age 40 still have 15 years to go before they can dip into their retirement pot
8. From science progression point of view, people in the mid-40s are at their prime, most productive and most knowledgable. If all scientists have the same FIRE mindset, mankind won’t achieve what we achieved today. There will be very few inventions
9. If the seniors in work place retire early, the juniors may not be able to learn the trade in the most efficient manner.
10. RE is a selfish act. You enjoy the education provided to you for first 20 years. Bear in mind education are paid for by taxes from your predecessors who work hard. If they RE, taxes will drop, and you will not be able to enjoy the free education
11. After you graduate, you learn the skills from experienced seniors who don't retire early. You add value to yourself and progress through the corporate ladder and make more money
12. But when you reach 40 y/o, you have made enough money to retire and say bye bye
13. Instead of giving back to your country/society, you leave them and enjoy your personal lives. Younger generation will suffer
14. And when you become older and weaker 30 years later, you consume the resources and become a burden to the society.
RE at 40 years old is too early. If you have this mindset, you are a selfish person in the big picture. Work at least to the official retirement age. The country/society/younger generation needs you. Give back and contribute your part so that both the generations before and after you can enjoy the benefit you have enjoyed.
Sorry but I guess lots of ppl had misunderstand / disagreement / bias on RE part. Many had take the stand that RE is equivalent to normal retirement post 55 or 60 years olds where ppl only "makan, tidur dan main". Well, if you looks more carefully, especially from angmo blogger, many of them effective transit into another type of works (something meaningful to their believe) instead of corporate 9-5 job. Thus, i can't agreed on all the points above as the very fundamental view on FI/RE is different; but I'm really feel RE (retirement early) is a misleading terminology.
Besides, we had to admit that not everyone can archive FI, and among these ppl, not all of them can resist the greed and move on to RE. Anyhow, the world is huge enough to accept these diversity, similiar to religion & races. Thus, many points wont's happened as not every can FI/RE, and affect the whole economy eventually, similar to you can't expect ALL smoker stop smoking as all of us knew is not good for health. I guess you were old enough appreciate this is not a perfect world.
One the other hand, if one success reached his FI at 40 and break away from his corporate minion job could due to his prioity on health/family or being forced i.e:layoff. His still contributing in other forms, eg: funding for business via investment/stock/etc, spend more focus and raise their kids be a better person, charity works, or even writing an self-help book etc. Would you agreed these are much better than those still works but on sin industries related to gambling, human or weapon trafficker, drug dealer, etc?
FI essentially is an enablement on finacially wise to allow someone move to next stage. while RE part is one trying find a new balance of his life. So long this new balance is not hurting anyone, we shouldnt' take any prejudicement on it.
Many breakthru and innovation mainly from "passionated" scientist, and these ppl unlikely take RE as their passion and purpose is what they doing in their dayjob. FI is just meant there is no financial stress for them. Unfortunately, in corporate world, most of corporate minion are soulless and all these cog are replaceable when it needed. Furthermore, some new youngester not neccessary value their senior opinion, and corporate life is getting worse due to ever demanding and constant changes. Afterall, the manager, senior manager or even CEO just another cog.