QUOTE(bartbarb @ May 31 2013, 11:36 AM)
The 3d conversion got pretty good reviews - for IMAX and the 3d bluray release.I'd say its worth it if you have time and cash - and enjoy the additional (not compulsory) added depth in 3d films.
Movies Jurassic Park I, II, III & IV, Update: Second, Jurassic Park Trilogy
|
|
May 31 2013, 12:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
87 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: PJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 3 2013, 05:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
87 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: PJ |
QUOTE(masterelr @ May 31 2013, 10:46 PM) I'm sure as hell re-watching this again. I remember watching this 20 years ago and people were actually screaming their lungs off. Especially during the part the jeep falls from the tree. Glad to report that the 3D is very effective here - amazing conversion work on par with anything shot in 3D. I just hope the 3D won't ruin it. 3D movies are known to be darker and gets blur(er) when the camera pans too fast. If its not done right it will even be a pain to watch. On another note, its sad that even after 20 years and with all the advancement in technology, newer movies are still showing dinosaurs that are more laughable than terrifying. However some notes: - IMAX at TGV 1u - sit further away from the screen if possible.. as its almost a 10yr old movie shot in 35mm, theres very little detail in the resulting imax blowup size - my only complaint abt the detail level.. other normal 3d theaters may not exhibit this problem?.. As for dark and blurry 3d - this is the fault of projection quality:- - i found 3D at GSC tropicana and paradigm to be quite dim and blurry. - GSC 1u is slightly better. - tgv 1U - the best - during 'the hobbit 3d hfr 48' - very bright and dynamic - even tho hated the HFR 48. This post has been edited by lyn_grayskale: Jun 3 2013, 05:50 PM |
|
|
Jun 17 2015, 02:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
87 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: PJ |
QUOTE(QuickFire @ Jun 16 2015, 10:31 PM) In the wise words of Mr. Stringer Bell. While I always look forward to spinning the bluray of TLW - it'll always be the most uneven entry in the JP series - mixing some great gems:That's like a forty degree day. Ain't nobody got nuttin to say about a forty degree day. Fifty? Bring a smile to your face. Sixty? Shit, niggas are damn near barbecuing that mothafucka. Go down to twenty? Niggas get they bitch on. Get they blood complainin... but forty? Nobody give a FUCK about forty. Nobody remember forty, and ya'll niggas is giving me way too many forty degree days. Jurassic World is a forty degree day movie. It's hardly going to be remembered two years from now. The trailer over the cliff sequence in TLW is bona fide classic nearly 20 years after it came out. - interesting mix of actors interacting off each other - john Williams score goes in new direction (tribalish percussion) - beautiful cinematography - trailer attack - camp attack - gymnastics - interracial genealogical mystery (as in ian's daughter) with the clunkers: - brining a baby trex into the trailer - the ending in san diego - various things other ppl complained about which I don't really notice - hence my short list of clunkers to this day there is debate (on imdb) as to what actually happened on the ship during it's transit to san diego - this one had me stumped as well - something was cut here? |
|
|
Jun 23 2015, 12:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
87 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: PJ |
QUOTE(lil^pig @ Jun 23 2015, 11:59 AM) I personally thought this movie is good. Good for kids that is. Remember when you were 5 and you don't go into these little details ? It's just about dinosaurs, eating kids, hero and heroine who can do just about anything. True but the previous Jurassic movies were very fun and cautionary what-if stories - as to why we shouldn't bring back dinosaurs - much less build a vacation destination around it - which was the spirit of the Michael Crichton's novels. The earlier movies - there was SOME effort at matching ground-breaking CG and effects with some semblance of logic - where even if you were 5 yrs old and didn't care about details - the details are there - it means there was effort put in presenting something exciting and close to clever.I think my dad would have thought the first Jurassic Park was stupid as well. haha! I think Chris Pratt was phoning in his performance - Byce is OK - but their interaction could've been worked upon - its very ho-hum every time I see humans interacting in their scenes - only the character of Lowery at the station was compelling to watch - being the ONLY one who is aware of what's going on and what's to come. The action scenes and money shots were good but everything else drags it down that i felt dirty after the whole thing ended in IMAX 3d -- i am thinking my money was better spent for the IMAX 3d of 'Jupiter Ascending'. Like another poster mentioned - this is a fine CG spectacular blockbuster on SyFy channel - but not deserving of the 'Jurassic' moniker in its title. |
| Change to: | 0.1585sec
0.28
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 12:18 PM |