Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Movies The AVENGERS: Movie Series Thread, Next: Avengers: Infinity War 25/4/2018

views
     
hairyLGS
post Jul 10 2010, 11:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
209 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor


Source:- http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/2008-12-6-moti...he-d-like-to-be

QUOTE
EXCLUSIVE: Edward Norton is not the Hulk in 'The Avengers'... but he'd like to be

That’s the word from Hitfix, who cites “Marvel sources” as saying that the company have decided to part ways with Edward Norton as Bruce Banner aka the Hulk, and will instead be hiring an unknown to play the role for Joss Whedon’s “The Avengers”. Of course, like a lot of Marvel films nowadays, it’s all just conjecture and unnamed sources until the studio comes out and says it, and let’s face, there has been plenty — and I do mean plenty — of rushed “exclusive scoops” when it comes to Marvel movie casting, and this could very well be one of them.

Again, until Marvel makes it official via one of the trades, it’s just another Internet rumor, and should be treated as such.

What we do know is this: Robert Downey Jr. will definitely be playing Tony Stark aka Iron Man, Chris Hemsworth will definitely be playing Thor, Chris Evans is definitely Captain America, Samuel L. Jackson is definitely Nick Fury, Scarlett Johansson is the Black Widow, and Jeremy Renner is most definitely Hawkeye.

The Hulk? Well, that’s up in the air. And in case you’re keeping count, if this turns out to be true, the Hulk will have gone through three actors since it resurfaced as a movie franchise in 2003. That is one confused superhero.

hairyLGS
post Jul 12 2010, 03:59 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
209 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor


Source:- http://www.beyondhollywood.com/will-the-av...w-bruce-banner/

QUOTE
CONFIRMED: The Avengers Will be Assembling a New Hulk/Bruce Banner

Marvel Studios has confirmed  that Edward Norton won’t be reprising his role as The Hulk in “The Avengers”. This from Marvel Studios President of Production Kevin Feige himself:

    "We have made the decision to not bring Ed Norton back to portray the title role of Bruce Banner in the Avengers. Our decision is definitely not one based on monetary factors, but instead rooted in the need for an actor who embodies the creativity and collaborative spirit of our other talented cast members. The Avengers demands players who thrive working as part of an ensemble, as evidenced by Robert, Chris H, Chris E, Sam, Scarlett, and all of our talented casts. We are looking to announce a name actor who fulfills these requirements, and is passionate about the iconic role in the coming weeks."

Edward Norton’s agent Brian Swardstrom has responded  to Marvel’s decision to re-cast The Hulk in Joss Whedon’s upcoming “The Avengers”:

    "This offensive statement from Kevin Feige at Marvel is a purposefully misleading, inappropriate attempt to paint our client in a negative light. Here are the facts: two months ago, Kevin called me and said he wanted Edward to reprise the role of Bruce Banner in The Avengers. He told me it would be his fantasy to bring Edward on stage with the rest of the cast at ComiCon and make it the event of the convention. When I said that Edward was definitely open to this idea, Kevin was very excited and we agreed that Edward should meet with Joss Whedon to discuss the project. Edward and Joss had a very good meeting (confirmed by Feige to me) at which Edward said he was enthusiastic at the prospect of being a part of the ensemble cast. Marvel subsequently made him a financial offer to be in the film and both sides started negotiating in good faith. This past Wednesday, after several weeks of civil, uncontentious discussions, but before we had come to terms on a deal, a representative from Marvel called to say they had decided to go in another direction with the part. This seemed to us to be a financial decision but, whatever the case, it is completely their prerogative, and we accepted their decision with no hard feelings.

    We know a lot of fans have voiced their public disappointment with this result, but this is no excuse for Feige’s mean spirited, accusatory comments. Counter to what Kevin implies here, Edward was looking forward to the opportunity to work with Joss and the other actors in the Avengers cast, many of whom are personal friends of his. Feige’s statement is unprofessional, disingenuous and clearly defamatory. Mr. Norton talent, tireless work ethic and professional integrity deserve more respect, and so do Marvel’s fans.
"
This post has been edited by hairyLGS: Jul 12 2010, 04:01 PM
hairyLGS
post Jul 12 2010, 04:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
209 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor


QUOTE(Kyoyagami @ Jul 12 2010, 04:20 PM)
So, who do you believe in? The Agent or the President?

So, third Bruce. Ok. Bring it. Just don't tell me its Adrien Brody sudah lah or else I will ROFL.
*
If he's in Predators, who knows he might go "HULK SMASH" laugh.gif
hairyLGS
post Jul 13 2010, 11:33 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
209 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor


QUOTE(firedauz @ Jul 13 2010, 10:59 AM)
Maybe they're bringing back Eric Bana tongue.gif
*
Then surely there will be more protest laugh.gif
hairyLGS
post Jul 15 2010, 09:10 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
209 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor


QUOTE(firedauz @ Jul 15 2010, 08:55 AM)
Sauce: http://www.deadline.com/2010/07/mark-ruffa...n-the-avengers/

Mark's a good actor, but I don't think this is a good choice for him.
*
He needs a lot of anger mis-management laugh.gif
hairyLGS
post Jul 15 2010, 10:15 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
209 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor


QUOTE(Kyoyagami @ Jul 15 2010, 09:47 AM)
In IMDB,

it seems that Eric Bana is being called to step back in as Hulk. How? laugh.gif
*
Hmmmm hmm.gif

hairyLGS
post Jul 15 2010, 10:29 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
209 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor


QUOTE(Kyoyagami @ Jul 15 2010, 10:25 AM)
But the call is made by fans of the Hulk series. I guess its a counter move after the rumor of Mark Ruffalo. tongue.gif
*
Well, if can't get Norton, get Bana laugh.gif
hairyLGS
post Jul 15 2010, 05:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
209 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor


OMG... Him?!?!?!?

shocking.gif
hairyLGS
post Jul 23 2010, 12:29 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
209 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor


Source:- http://movies.yahoo.com/news/movies.reuter...vengers-reuters

QUOTE
Joss Whedon confirms he will direct "Avengers"

user posted image

SAN DIEGO (Hollywood Reporter) - Joss Whedon confirmed at Comic-Con on Thursday that he is, indeed, directing "The Avengers."

"It's not an official thing, I think because Marvel couldn't afford a press release," the "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" creator said during a panel with fellow fanboy favorite J.J. Abrams. "So can we make that an official thing? I'm directing 'The Avengers.'"

The project is based on a Marvel comic all-star series that brought together Captain America, the Hulk and Iron Man, among others.

"I am still writing an outline. I'm still in that stage," Whedon said. "I will say the thing I love about it, the thing that made me excited to do it, is how counterintuitive it is. These people shouldn't be in the same room -- and that is the very definition of family."

hairyLGS
post Jul 24 2010, 05:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
209 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor


Source:- http://www.beyondhollywood.com/mark-ruffal...n-the-avengers/

QUOTE
Mark Ruffalo is THIS CLOSE to Being the New Hulk in The Avengers

It won’t be officially official until Marvel makes an announcement, possibly at Comic Con later today. According to The Wrap, though, the deal is almost done, and the goal is to finish everything up so Ruffalo can fly over to San Diego to join his fellow Avengers in Geektown. The sticking point, as with most Marvel movies, is the studio wanting a major commitment and multiple films from the actor, while not paying a whole lot for it.

If the deal gets done and Ruffalo shows up, it’ll be a grand entrance, no doubt. At least, for those in attendance who aren’t still holding their breath for Edward Norton
to reprise his role as Bruce Banner aka the Hulk’s mild mannered alter ego. Things could get a tad frisky there when the announcement is made, I’d imagine.

hairyLGS
post Jul 25 2010, 04:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
209 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor


Source:- http://www.beyondhollywood.com/the-avenger...ally-assembled/

QUOTE
The Avengers Have Been Officially Assembled

user posted image

It’s official, kids: The Avengers have assembled over at Comic Con at the big Marvel Studios panel, and here is the official cast:

Robert Downey Jr. as Tony Stark/Iron Man, Samuel L. Jackson as SHIELD head honcho Nick Fury, Clark Gregg as SHIELD Agent Phil Coulson, Chris Hemsworth as Thor, Chris Evans as Steve Rogers/Captain America, Scarlett Johansson as Natasha Romanoff/The Black Widow, Jeremy Renner as Clint Barton/Hawkeye …

… and Mark Ruffalo as Bruce Banner/The Hulk.

And Joss Whedon will, of course, direct.

So who is missing? Well, no Ant-Man, for one. But that’s about it. Check out the photo of the cast and director Joss Whedon on stage.


This post has been edited by hairyLGS: Jul 25 2010, 04:12 PM
hairyLGS
post Jul 26 2010, 12:59 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
209 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor


The Comic Con Introduction of the Avengers Assembled!



thumbup.gif
hairyLGS
post Aug 5 2010, 01:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
209 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor


Source:- http://www.beyondhollywood.com/the-avenger...er-well-teases/

QUOTE
The Avengers Comic Con Teaser Trailer, well, Teases

It’s your first-ever footage  from Joss Whedon’s sure-to-be epic comic book movie “The Avengers” that was shown over at Comic Con, and it’s … well, it’s a big ol tease with Samuel L. Jackson providing a brief voiceover narration and the Avengers logo. But hey, better than nothing, right?


Can't find it in YouTube so for those who want to watch this narrated teaser Comic-Con trailer, go to the source.
hairyLGS
post Aug 12 2010, 12:56 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
209 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor


Look! Its The Avengers trailer (NOT!). laugh.gif

This faux trailer was made by someone... but it does look interesting on how they pieces it together.


hairyLGS
post Aug 24 2010, 11:32 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
209 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor


Source:- http://www.beyondhollywood.com/joss-whedon...sh-on-the-wasp/

QUOTE
Joss Whedon Talks Avengers, Puts the Kibosh on the Wasp

Joss Whedon hasn’t said much about his upcoming “The Avengers”, but he’s begun to open up, which is good news for the Interwebs and its legions of fanboys. Specifically, Whedon tells The Sunday Herald-Sun (via Moviehole) that the Black Widow (aka Scarlett Johansson) will indeed be the only female Avenger on the roster in his movie, though that doesn’t mean there can’t be other females in the cast. Well, that goes without saying, right? They just won’t be suiting up to fight supervillains, that’s all.

Basically: forget all those rumors of The Wasp (Eva Longoria or no) showing up. And if the Wasp isn’t showing up, does that mean no Giant-Man, either?

Whedon goes on to say a little bit about the storyline he has planned for the big-budget Marvel super team:

"It will be a new story that has many things from different arcs of the comics in it. There is no one Avengers story that you can just do the way that you can do the origin of Spider-Man. You really have to cull from the original and The Ultimates, which is one of The Avengers titles."

I’m still thinking The Hulk as the villain in the first movie, leading to the Skrulls showing up in the sequel. Some storylines I’ve heard had the Skrulls manipulating the Hulk on his rampage, and once their manipulation is discovered, leading to an all-out war between the Skrulls and Avengers in the sequel
. That could be fun. Expensive as hell, but really, really fun.

“The Avengers”, starring Robert Downey Jr, Samuel L.Jackson, Scarlett Johansson, Clark Gregg, Chris Hemsworth, Chris Evans, Jeremy Renner and Mark Ruffalo, assembles in the Summer of 2012.

hairyLGS
post Sep 16 2010, 11:48 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
209 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor


Source:- http://www.beyondhollywood.com/jeremy-renn...urple-costumes/

QUOTE
Jeremy Renner Talks Avengers, No Purple Costume

user posted image

In an interview with the boys at MTV while out promoting his crime film  “The Town”, Jeremy Renner talked about his upcoming appearance in Joss whedon’s “The Avengers” as Hawkeye. Specifically, his relationship with Scarlett Johansson’s Black Widow, and Clint Barton’s choice of wardrobe in the 2012 feature.

On the character’s classic purple-themed costume:

QUOTE
I think it’s going to be a little more reality-based. You can kind of tell with Scarlett [Johansson]‘s character [in 'Iron Man 2'], it’s going to be more of a uniform . . . and not a big purple, comics  sort of thing. That’s why I think it’s more palatable to audiences — there’s almost a sense of reality to these superheroes. That’s what makes it interesting to me, anyway.


On Hawkeye’s relationship with Johansson’s Black Widow:

QUOTE
We will [have a relationship], I think, in this one as well. We’re kind of a team, and what that relationship is, is still to be discovered.


It definitely sounds like Renner’s Hawkeye will be patterned more after the Ultimates version and not the classic comic book look. Of course, given what happened with the Black Widow in the Ultimates universe, Hawkeye may want to watch his back around his fellow SHIELD partner. Just sayin’.

hairyLGS
post Oct 19 2010, 09:31 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
209 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor


Source:- http://www.beyondhollywood.com/concept-art...d-heli-carrier/

QUOTE
Concept Art For The Avengers’ SHIELD Heli-Carrier

user posted image

Will SHIELD’s famous heli-carriers make an appearance in Joss Whedon’s “The Avengers”? It would appear so, at least according to these early concept artwork (via I09).

The designs look more “submarine”-ish than the SHIELD heli-carriers I’ve seen in the comics. As far as I know, the heli-carriers spent most of their time in the air, while these designs would seem to indicate they’re going to be spending just as much time on the water.

In any case, we’ll find out for sure when “The Avengers” opens in May 4, 2012.

hairyLGS
post Oct 19 2010, 09:44 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
209 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor


Source:- http://www.beyondhollywood.com/disney-gets...aptain-america/

QUOTE
Disney Gets The Avengers and Iron Man 3, Paramount Keeps Thor and Captain America

user posted image

Looks like Marvel Studios is slowly but surely severing all ties with Paramount when it comes to their future properties. Marvel and Disney have struck a deal that should place all of their future characters under the Disney flag.

Press release:

   
QUOTE
BURBANK, Calif. – October 18, 2010 – The Walt Disney Studios, Paramount Pictures and Marvel Studios announced they have reached an agreement under which Paramount will transfer its worldwide marketing and distribution rights to Disney for Marvel Studios’ The Avengers and Iron Man 3. Paramount will remain the worldwide distributor of the upcoming films, Thor and Captain America, as well as the previously released Iron Man and Iron Man 2.

    Under terms of the new deal, Disney will pay Paramount $115 million for the transfer of the distribution rights to Iron Man 3 and The Avengers to be paid on the theatrical release dates. These monies will serve as a minimum guarantee against the distribution fees.

    “In completing this agreement, Disney will now assume worldwide marketing and distribution of The Avengers and Iron Man 3 and leverage these two highly-anticipated films across the multiple global platforms of The Walt Disney Company,” said Rich Ross, Chairman of The Walt Disney Studios. “We appreciate the tremendous momentum that Paramount established with these iconic Marvel characters and look forward to propelling the brand even further in the coming years.”

    “Five years ago, when Paramount and Marvel made our initial deal, both our businesses were in very different places,” said Brad Grey, Chairman & CEO of Paramount Pictures. “We are grateful for the partnership we have had with the terrific Marvel team over these years and proud of the work we have done together. Today, this new agreement is the right deal for Paramount, for Marvel and for Disney. We look forward to working together on Thor and Captain America, and we wish Disney and Marvel the utmost success, in what we know will be a very productive and wide-ranging partnership.”

    “Paramount has been a wonderful partner in helping Marvel Studios bring our characters to the big screen,” said Alan Fine, Office of the President, Marvel Worldwide, Inc. “This agreement makes sense now that Marvel is part of The Walt Disney Company.”

    Paramount will release Marvel Entertainment’s Thor and Captain America worldwide beginning on May 6 and July 22 of 2011, respectively. The Avengers will be licensed to Epix under Paramount’s existing pay television arrangement.


Who knew guys and gals who wear their underwear on the outside of their pants would be such big business?

hairyLGS
post Oct 30 2010, 09:32 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
209 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor


Source:- http://www.beyondhollywood.com/mark-ruffal...less-ed-norton/

QUOTE
Mark Ruffalo’s Hulk Will be More Robert Downey Jr., Less Ed Norton

user posted image

That is to say, you can expect a lot more humor and charm to Mark Ruffalo and Joss Whedon’s version of The Hulk aka Bruce Banner than, say, the miserable, running-for-his-life Bruce Banner that showed up in Edward Norton’s portrayal of the character in “Hulk”, or the somber, father issues suffering of Eric Bana in Ang Lee’s version.

Ruffalo tells Digital Spy:

   
QUOTE
We want him to be an everyman, not so dour. A little more charming or accessibl. We’re still sort of working it out with the script. I’m not exactly sure what it’ll end up being but we’ve talked quite a bit about the Bill Bixby version of the Hulk.

    I have a feeling there’ll be a little nudge, nudge, wink, wink. I think [Robert Downey Jr.] sort of reinvented that genre in a way and I talked to him quite a bit before I took the part, how it works and how to do it. He said, ‘C’mon we’ll have fun, we’ll work it out.’ I trust him a lot so I think we’ll have a good time playing with it.


This is certainy in line with Joss Whedon’s style, who is writing the script and will be directing for Marvel Studios. Whedon can get pretty dark at times when the need calls for it, but I’d say anywhere from 80-90% of his scripts are usually about the characters being charming or having fun. When you’re doing a movie about a group of superheroes fighting (from some rumors, possibly aliens from outer space), going “dark” is sort of silly.

“The Avengers” invade in 2012.

hairyLGS
post Nov 5 2010, 09:59 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
209 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor


Source:- http://www.beyondhollywood.com/apparently-...s-the-avengers/

QUOTE
Apparently $160 Million is Not Enough to Make Joss Whedon’s The Avengers

user posted image

$160 million or thereabouts, anyway.

Rumors are running rampant that Marvel Studios, as they are wont to do, is trying to curb cost on Whedon’s upcoming “The Avengers” even before the film starts shooting by limiting the budget to around $160 million (according to I09). That, says some insiders, isn’t nearly enough to make the movie, and as a result, there have been “delays” in the pre-production of the first-ever big-budget comic book superhero team movie.

   
QUOTE
Some people say it can’t be done. Others say it can be done – even if then, in certain well heeled Los Angeles bars, they assure each other that it can’t. And while some people have walked off the project, others are planning a longer game. Basically do the work, then when they run out of budget (which they believe they will) trust that Marvel Studios and their investors will pony up the extra necessary cash rather than leave the movie unfinished.


Only in Hollywood would $160 million not be “enough” to make a movie. Meanwhile, you give the South Koreans or Japanese $160 million, and they would probably hand you back 4 “Avengers”-sized movies. Or hell, Whedon could probably give you 10 “Firefly” movies with that much money.

Personally, I think this is all very silly. My guess is, Marvel just wants Whedon to know that he’s not working with an unlimited budget, but when push comes to shove, they will of course sign over more bucks to finish the movie. “The Avengers” is a sure-fire mega hit that will launch not just a franchise, but franchises. You don’t turn your back on that just to save, what, $50 extra million? Hell, this movie might make that on first-week DVD sales alone.

So I wouldn’t worry, kids. The Avengers will assemble as expected in 2012.


2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0804sec    0.50    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 08:23 PM