Exactly. All these low tier brands you see in garage sales always sell for cheap and even then not a lot of demand. No one wants to take this into account though. Rather continue the narrative that "Asus Bad". You will feel it 2 years from now.

A lot of buyers still care dude. I never had issues selling my Asus GPU. Always get buyers within one week or even less. Only ever bought Asus before. With Zotac, had to lower price a lot to even get an offer. Just the way it is.

Wow see what nvidia doing. Don't understand why they so upset with honest feedback. Ray tracing was something nice to have but not essential for now as hardware still not powerful enough to get a significant ray tracing result.

They are threatening the reviewer for not saying what they like. Their card actually was not bad just this was a bad way of marketing. Luckily they are not the only graphic card provider in the market.

"More to come"

or, just reveal the full story before publishing lol.

Did Gamers Nexus ever revealed the full story of the Colorful situation other than his initial tweet?

Capped power limit just to make sure it's not the GPU. Got the same result, although it took a lot longer to do so. AFAIK both HWInfo and GPU-Z uses the same sensors, just that GPU-Z refreshes more frequently. Pink indicates thermal throttling.

https://pictr.com/images/2020/12/12/7oetyQ.png

Capped power limit just to make sure it's not the GPU. Got the same result, although it took a lot longer to do so. AFAIK both HWInfo and GPU-Z uses the same sensors, just that GPU-Z refreshes more frequently. Pink indicates thermal throttling.

https://pictr.com/images/2020/12/12/7oetyQ.png

Capped the power limit and undervolted the card so it's not running at its maximum boost clock, just to verify it isn't the GPU thermal throttling.
The card will work. Note that faster PCIE3 cards may be bandwidth throttled, but the CPU bottleneck is most likely. Even newer titles are bottlenecked by Core i5 quadcores without hyperthreading at 1080p, let alone a Core 2 Quad (or Duo).
Can share voltage curve and memory clock OC? Also, are you deshrouded like @Bonchi, and if not, what's your fan curve at?

1) Confirm that you have sufficient (direct contact cooling) - if you have a 3090 be careful as the temps between front n backside of the pcb is day n night.
2) Keep adding 100 and bench every time until you stop gaining performance (or even lose as error correction kicks in)
3) Go back to the last 'stable' (without performance stagnation or loss) point and take off another 50-100 for safety as other applications might stress it differently.

Don't overdo it in general... as I said ... if Nvidia wanted you to, you'd be able to see the temperature reporting of the 8/12/24 sensors.
Curve OC is pretty safe but I wouldn't say the same thing about VRAM OC. It will clock down at a defined temp but I doubt it's good for long term if its running right below the max.

Personally despite the chips actually being produced for 21GBit/s and the card being on water and +1300 being stable (+1250 on air) ... on my 3080 I just use +500 as a casual setting and even on my performance setting I 'just' went for +1000.

already done that.

same ram speed?? thats stupid. it should be same vdimm. but because noobs cant oc ram they dont understand yhe concept.

funny how ppl nit pick. already produced.
5900x trades blows with 10900k.

10900k doesnt bsod. the crappiest silicion also none.
can u guarantee 5900x doesnt. oh yeah forgot. its giga fauly, msi fault, asus fault. keep forgetting the zen defence line.

Nope. 5600X will give you more gains though.


https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-5-5600x/22.html

You can see more of techpowerup charts from the link.
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-5-5600x/17.html