Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 What actually makes you support a team..., ...in the first place?

views
     
refnulf
post May 5 2007, 10:59 AM

I love Hulu
*******
Senior Member
7,937 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(Duke Red @ May 5 2007, 10:55 AM)
Which is why I said most of your fans have no idea because a vast majority have only begun supporting after the EPL was established. In any case, Man Utd have always been on the ascendancy, with the exception of being relegated by Man City of course.

What constitutes a glory hunter anyway? You mentioned growing up amongst glory hunting fans from the 70's & 80's. Are they still fans now? If so, I don't think they can be called as such.
*
Not everyone started supporting Manchester United when they were champions. Which is why I get rather angry when people say Manchester United were all about the money and they rose to the top just like Chelsea.
refnulf
post May 5 2007, 12:06 PM

I love Hulu
*******
Senior Member
7,937 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(Duke Red @ May 5 2007, 11:10 AM)
Well I started supporting Liverpool when we were a winning team, I'd have to admit. Like I said though, you don't get to watch too many games back then, only cup finals.
You talking about Beckham's legion of female fans in point no.1?

Geeze man how old are you?  biggrin.gif
*
I can't really say why I started supporting Manchester United. Was it the players? The fans? The stadium itself? The red jersey? The name Manchester United? The fact that every joker around me supported Liverpool and Arsenal?

I cannot recall.

But I did start supporting them when they weren't anywhere near the top. And it's been one hell of a journey from being in the middle of the table to the top of the table. Now that's been the real enjoyment. Seeing your team, struggle, and end up being champions for a number of years, getting better and better. Of course, the hard times were around too. Losing the titles to Blackburn, Arsenal, Chelsea etc. But that's part and parcel of supporting a team. You don't jump ship when trouble arises.


refnulf
post May 6 2007, 12:54 AM

I love Hulu
*******
Senior Member
7,937 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(Grengo01 @ May 5 2007, 12:09 PM)
Reff, well said... never jump ship when the going gets rough... then again.. nowadays tough to say.. tell me in 10 years time you still support the same team.. smile.gif
*
20+ years and counting.
refnulf
post May 6 2007, 01:16 PM

I love Hulu
*******
Senior Member
7,937 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(Grengo01 @ May 6 2007, 12:43 PM)
okay okay.. I catch your drift... smile.gif.  Dont want to sound old.... sigh... 20++ years here too.. smile.gif.

Seydee, I respect Chelsea fans during and before Ranieri's era. They were true London's football aristocrats.. playing delightful football with likes of Zola. The fans... were true fans... long starved off glory. They deserve their glory now, but for those that started hopping on the Chelsea bandwagon since 3 seasons ago, please tell me u still support Chelsea 10 years from today. Or better, if Roman ditch Chelsea and Chelsea FC goes down to Championship League, tell me your blood is still BLUE...  notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif
*
That's true. First of all, back in the day I only knew one guy that supported Chelsea FC and believe me. Chelsea FC sucked big time before the billionaire came about. They were a mid table team and would never get to the top 4 no matter what they did.

But this guy was a true fan. He wore the jerseys, he had the playing cards, he had the magazine, etc. He knew the history, the players, the managers, even the back room staff, etc.

That was a fan and he stuck to the club through thick and thin. Now I don't blame all the new Chelsea fans for supporting the club now. I mean fine, they saw a club with resources, buying tons of top players and they are now challenging for everything. It's not a bad thing, they're not a big club. They still don't come close to the top 4 in terms of history, tradition, and success, but you never know in the next 100 years things could change.

But, the fans now. You can go ahead and support Chelsea. But, if anything happened to Chelsea. If the billionaire disappeared, if he stopped buying top players, if Chelsea stopped challenging for the top competitions. What will happen? If the fans stick to the club then, I see no problems. But if they all suddenly leave in drones, then my suspicions are correct. That they're nothing but glory hunters and that they only supported Chelsea because of the wealth and resources that they had.

Myself, I don't see a change in club at anytime. Manchester United is what I grew up with and it's what I'll support till I die. It's absolutely impossible to even think of another club. My support might just be a tad different from the supporters in UK, in the sense that I'm unable to go to games, or buy merchandise from the mega store in the stadium, or even have that hate for the rival clubs because of my location.

But the way the rival fans behave here, it helps alot with the rivalry and hating.

We'll see, what happens in the future. Then only will we know who genuinely supports a club. Manchester United is doing well this season, suddenly there are tons more supporters posting in the thread. Posters that are going "great, fabulous, blah blah blah"

Where were they during the 4 years of transition? Perhaps they didn't come here yet. But we'll see the coming seasons if we stop doing so well.

This post has been edited by refnulf: May 6 2007, 01:18 PM
refnulf
post May 6 2007, 07:43 PM

I love Hulu
*******
Senior Member
7,937 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(Soulsareworthless @ May 6 2007, 05:22 PM)
You telling me Mu didn't buy their trophys? How about Ferdinand, Veron, Carrick and Rooney to name a few.

Don't be a green eyed monster just because we have the financial muscle due to the fact we have a great business model.

PS: How many home grown players are in MU's starting XI? Gary Neville, Scholes and Giggs. And we have Cassilas, Torres, Guti and Raul.
*
You're also forgetting Fletcher, O'Shea, Brown who are also playing in almost every game now.

Also, you're forgetting that we don't buy 20 players at once. We buy players as we need them. We don't go after galacticos or whatever just to win elections. Our upper management doesn't go around promising the fans certain players to get votes and support. We also don't go targeting players that are on top of their game, and keep on coming out with crap to unsettle them. We target a player we need for a certain position and we try our best to get him. Not because he's a galactico.

We have more home grown players than any of the top four in the premiership. We also have the least foreign players on the field.

This post has been edited by refnulf: May 6 2007, 07:48 PM
refnulf
post May 7 2007, 11:02 AM

I love Hulu
*******
Senior Member
7,937 posts

Joined: Oct 2004



This is going way off topic. So I'm ending it here.

This post has been edited by refnulf: May 7 2007, 11:06 AM
refnulf
post May 7 2007, 02:55 PM

I love Hulu
*******
Senior Member
7,937 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(verx @ May 7 2007, 12:21 PM)
Before Perez took over we didn't actually splash that much as we also had heavy debts at that time. Perez despite his obvious flaws was a very good businessman. The sale of our training ground helped to clear off the debts but i would like to make it clear here that the money DID NOT come from the government (I have details on the deal and i think i'll post them later in the RM thread). Real Madrid is a non-profit organisation and they have to be very transparent especially when u have almost 85000 owners and have to provide a financial report to them every year. We then went on a marketing rampage taking the Real Madrid brand to new heights especially in South America, Japan, China, US making us the highest revenue generators for a football club. This in turn secures the club's future for a very long time.
*
Perez took over from Lorenzo Sanz and got rid of the debt. Although that was contradicted by Ramon Calderon. He was also quite the marketing genius. Still, his galactico purchases hasn't been that good since 2002 I think. And he hasn't handle several things properly, like Makelele. And Del Bosque's termination, etc. Galacticos haven't been doin well, etc.



 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0257sec    0.52    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 07:12 AM