QUOTE(g88 @ May 4 2007, 08:34 PM)
One of the good wide angle lens but compare to 17-40L..this is no.2
Wrong wrong wrong.EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM, Anyone using ?
|
|
 May 5 2007, 04:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
514 posts Joined: Nov 2005 From: Somewhere 
|
Wrong wrong wrong. |
Quote|
|
May 5 2007, 09:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
514 posts Joined: Nov 2005 From: Somewhere
|
QUOTE(nairud @ May 5 2007, 02:01 AM) Dont just put wrong wrong wrong. State your reason. Your post is counted as spam. Let's just say that my reply would involve the 16-35 L lens (both the Mk I & II). My answer stops there, assuming that g88 is envisioning it on a 1.6x (or 1.3x, even)sensor. If NOT (i.e. full frame), then you have the 24-70 L lens to contend with (17 - 55mm with 1.6 crop, go figure), among other things. Remember, the EF-S lens cannot be mounted on 1D bodies  Okay I'm tired of explaining this. This is just to justify that it wasn't spam. End. |
| Change to: |  0.0140sec
 0.83
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 07:08 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.