well, i dont think u will get 45nm on ur AM2 system. this is a really sad case for current AM2 users.
[wtf] AM3/DDR3/45nm in 2008?
[wtf] AM3/DDR3/45nm in 2008?
|
|
May 3 2007, 04:27 AM, updated 19y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
808 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
look at these.
well, i dont think u will get 45nm on ur AM2 system. this is a really sad case for current AM2 users. |
|
|
|
|
|
May 3 2007, 04:31 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,494 posts Joined: Dec 2005 From: Wangsa Maju |
lol.. lucky i'm still in 939
|
|
|
May 3 2007, 05:10 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
10,544 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: GMT +8:00 |
Unless they're doing something really special, i don't expect to see any 45nm chips from AMD until the end of next year, if not later. They have to talk a bit because intel is already mass producing 45nm chips right now.
|
|
|
May 3 2007, 06:32 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,474 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
AM3??? When AM2 released, AMD had mention that this socket will take for few years. But right now, AM3...
This is bad new for those AM2 user, but this is a good new for s939 or s754 user!!! 45nm on 2008. It is too late, i think that time Intel already has new technology may be is 25nm or even is 10nm processor..... |
|
|
May 3 2007, 06:36 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,494 posts Joined: Dec 2005 From: Wangsa Maju |
what about those AM2+? i tot they will release it this year?
|
|
|
May 3 2007, 06:47 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
808 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
QUOTE(Faint @ May 3 2007, 06:32 AM) AM3??? When AM2 released, AMD had mention that this socket will take for few years. But right now, AM3... dont dream This is bad new for those AM2 user, but this is a good new for s939 or s754 user!!! 45nm on 2008. It is too late, i think that time Intel already has new technology may be is 25nm or even is 10nm processor..... |
|
|
|
|
|
May 3 2007, 08:54 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,496 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: Baling, Kedah |
QUOTE(Faint @ May 3 2007, 06:32 AM) AM3??? When AM2 released, AMD had mention that this socket will take for few years. But right now, AM3... maybe 32nm, intel was working on that...This is bad new for those AM2 user, but this is a good new for s939 or s754 user!!! 45nm on 2008. It is too late, i think that time Intel already has new technology may be is 25nm or even is 10nm processor..... |
|
|
May 3 2007, 08:56 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#8
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
QUOTE(Faint @ May 3 2007, 06:32 AM) AM3??? When AM2 released, AMD had mention that this socket will take for few years. But right now, AM3... no.This is bad new for those AM2 user, but this is a good new for s939 or s754 user!!! 45nm on 2008. It is too late, i think that time Intel already has new technology may be is 25nm or even is 10nm processor..... s939 and s754 user will remain on their respective sockets because when am3 releases... there'll be another am4 and they keep waiting for em |
|
|
May 3 2007, 08:57 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
10,544 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: GMT +8:00 |
|
|
|
May 3 2007, 09:39 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
986 posts Joined: Jul 2006 From: :: infront the steering :: |
AM3???
|
|
|
May 3 2007, 09:53 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,323 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Somewhere I Belong |
AM3? so what about AM2+ ?
|
|
|
May 3 2007, 10:09 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
391 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Bandar Baru Bangi/ Jalan Klang Lama |
but for 2008, it still a long wait from now, still can enjoy AM2 first since AM3 will also take quite sometimes to be more cheaper...
|
|
|
May 3 2007, 10:37 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,496 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: Baling, Kedah |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 3 2007, 10:41 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,257 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
May 3 2007, 10:46 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,496 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: Baling, Kedah |
|
|
|
May 3 2007, 10:47 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,257 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
they are on am2+
|
|
|
May 3 2007, 11:27 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,942 posts Joined: Nov 2005 From: Penang |
Most likely AM2+ is a trial 45nm but using DDR2
|
|
|
May 3 2007, 01:03 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
104 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Seremban |
AMD going make or break on Barcelona..
That roadmap will be meaningful if Barcelona/Agena/Kuma can make $$ for AMD. |
|
|
May 3 2007, 07:36 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,214 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Malaysia (Sarawak) |
Dude, amd phenom X2, FX and X4 will be coming soon... can't wait to see them head to head against intel core 2....
|
|
|
May 3 2007, 08:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
Why they want to put in some transition product like AM2+ , nth difference than AM2 except HT 3.0 and better power saving
i recommend the next upgrade should bypass AM2+ |
|
|
May 3 2007, 08:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
300 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
The link "AM2 and AM3 would be forward/backward compatible" in the article implied AM2+ is AM3, and that AM2+ can support both DDR2 and DDR3
What happen to that now and why a new socket again in place of AM2+? |
|
|
May 3 2007, 08:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,413 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Shah Alam |
LOL catching up technologies only burn your pocket
Once AM3 releases, the price sure a bit |
|
|
May 3 2007, 10:33 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
173 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
quite shame amd...killing they own self to chase ppl shadow..not a good idea for them change another socket to upgrade...seem like intel now become valueble and amd for budget only...
|
|
|
May 4 2007, 05:07 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,827 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Here On The Chair Status : Eating Donut |
my cousin working in AMD penang...she said they will launched their quad core this year and 8 core next year...start saving ur money now...
|
|
|
May 4 2007, 06:54 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
808 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
QUOTE(Oly @ May 4 2007, 05:07 AM) my cousin working in AMD penang...she said they will launched their quad core this year and 8 core next year...start saving ur money now... this info doesnt help at all ask her to take a ES barcelona chip out and give it to reliable reviewers (tomshardware, anandtech) to do a benchmark. |
|
|
May 4 2007, 07:01 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,413 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Shah Alam |
QUOTE(Oly @ May 4 2007, 05:07 AM) my cousin working in AMD penang...she said they will launched their quad core this year and 8 core next year...start saving ur money now... Thanks for the info, but why we wanna use quad since 8 core is just 1 year after, you know what I mean QUOTE(edwin3210 @ May 4 2007, 06:54 AM) At least he's trying to give out some info. Some of us might not know about this |
|
|
May 4 2007, 08:59 AM
|
|
Elite
8,545 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: 224.0.0.6 |
zzz...AM3 again...AMD changing the socket too fast i think
Bad news for AM2 users like me ...:SAD: -pWs- |
|
|
May 4 2007, 09:12 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,496 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: Baling, Kedah |
it will take some time... but for sure the price will lil expensive the am2 at the first, leter the price will reduce when am2 product phaseout
|
|
|
May 4 2007, 09:18 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,060 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang / PJ |
QUOTE(-pWs- @ May 4 2007, 08:59 AM) zzz...AM3 again...AMD changing the socket too fast i think no choice, our technology is moving way too fast, and the chips are much cheaper compare to oldern days. Hence manufacturers usually don't expect desktop consumers to upgrade a single CPU after 3 years. They expect you to change to a whole new system. It is very obvious when Intel says it is going to debut a new micro architecture every 2 years.Bad news for AM2 users like me ...:SAD: -pWs- |
|
|
May 4 2007, 09:20 AM
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
QUOTE(capcomfly @ May 3 2007, 10:33 PM) quite shame amd...killing they own self to chase ppl shadow..not a good idea for them change another socket to upgrade...seem like intel now become valueble and amd for budget only... you're still very wrongeverytime intel changes architecture, although it's the same socket... most likely it'll need new chipset and amd motherboards are often way affordable than intel's.... minus those generic/cheapo ones...which are more or less just the same. |
|
|
May 4 2007, 09:29 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,257 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(dattebayo @ May 3 2007, 08:00 PM) Why they want to put in some transition product like AM2+ , nth difference than AM2 except HT 3.0 and better power saving it is because this thing has been planned years before and there is no ddr3 on the market now, amd have to do something else they gonna lose more moneyi recommend the next upgrade should bypass AM2+ |
|
|
May 4 2007, 09:53 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,060 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang / PJ |
QUOTE(Radeon @ May 4 2007, 09:29 AM) it is because this thing has been planned years before and there is no ddr3 on the market now, amd have to do something else they gonna lose more money Actually AM2+ is misleading consumers in some way.Back in socket A, every chipset change with higher FSB support doesnt change the name of the socket. We never see Socket A, Socket A+, Socket A++ or whatever. Now, AMD decided to change the naming when the system bus is upgraded. AM2+ is a good example. It is exactly the same as AM2 socket, but with a different chipset and system bus, that's all. AM2 --> AM2+ is as simple as Socket A with VIA KT333 --> socket A with VIA KT400A. |
|
|
May 4 2007, 10:59 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
808 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
QUOTE(charge-n-go @ May 4 2007, 09:53 AM) Actually AM2+ is misleading consumers in some way. hmm...i heard with the old news that future mobo will be "chipset upgradeable"(just like how we upgrade our cpu. dunno when will we get that.Back in socket A, every chipset change with higher FSB support doesnt change the name of the socket. We never see Socket A, Socket A+, Socket A++ or whatever. Now, AMD decided to change the naming when the system bus is upgraded. AM2+ is a good example. It is exactly the same as AM2 socket, but with a different chipset and system bus, that's all. AM2 --> AM2+ is as simple as Socket A with VIA KT333 --> socket A with VIA KT400A. This post has been edited by edwin3210: May 4 2007, 10:59 AM |
|
|
May 4 2007, 11:36 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,060 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang / PJ |
Not in the near future. Besides, it is only possible if there is no system bus changes on the motherboard.
|
|
|
May 4 2007, 11:37 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,995 posts Joined: May 2005 |
wah now not only u have to choose CPU to install u have to choose chipset to install as well............. how does the mother board goin to look like...........
imagine ur mobo has 3 main chips. 1 south and 1 north bridge, + n core CPU........ and n stream processor of GPU.......... how many pc we have within our own pc by that time....... |
|
|
May 4 2007, 11:57 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
10,544 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: GMT +8:00 |
QUOTE(edwin3210 @ May 3 2007, 09:59 PM) hmm...i heard with the old news that future mobo will be "chipset upgradeable"(just like how we upgrade our cpu. dunno when will we get that. Things are moving to tighter integration, so pretty sure chipset upgrades won't be coming. They'll just be completely built into the cpu. |
|
|
May 4 2007, 12:11 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,827 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Here On The Chair Status : Eating Donut |
QUOTE(edwin3210 @ May 4 2007, 06:54 AM) this info doesnt help at all i allready ask her for a quad core engineering sample proc...she will try...ask her to take a ES barcelona chip out and give it to reliable reviewers (tomshardware, anandtech) to do a benchmark. Added on May 4, 2007, 12:14 pmfrom what i heard the new 8 core use two die...mean 2 4 core proc in one...thats what she said...i will ask her to snap for some picture... This post has been edited by Oly: May 4 2007, 12:14 PM |
|
|
May 4 2007, 12:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,060 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang / PJ |
QUOTE(ikanayam @ May 4 2007, 11:57 AM) Things are moving to tighter integration, so pretty sure chipset upgrades won't be coming. They'll just be completely built into the cpu. Maybe one day we can change the IO Hub on our own based on the features we want. But this will very far away from now.QUOTE(Oly @ May 4 2007, 12:11 PM) from what i heard the new 8 core use two die...mean 2 4 core proc in one...thats what she said...i will ask her to snap for some picture... So easily snap pictures? I am expecting they are top secrets, maybe ur cousin should not even tell you about it. |
|
|
May 4 2007, 01:16 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,330 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 192.168.1.2 |
[wtf] tag ???
btw, that's really wtf. see my rig below. i gonna got new rig c2d. now AM3 n DDR3 .... no point upgrade high end computer nowaday. technology never end. |
|
|
May 4 2007, 01:53 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,506 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
|
|
|
May 4 2007, 01:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
824 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: P J |
QUOTE(Suk @ May 4 2007, 01:16 PM) [wtf] tag ??? True enuf, thats y u guys should upgrade according to ur needs. For example, if AM2 is sufficient for now, just get a good mobo that supports it, then upgrade to the best X2 or FX that u can afford. Then the rest is just about ur graphic card and also the amount of memory and HDD needed. After all, for office work, BT, internet and chat, any X2 is more than sufficient at the moment, for the games, u just need to upgrade ur graphic cards. btw, that's really wtf. see my rig below. i gonna got new rig c2d. now AM3 n DDR3 .... no point upgrade high end computer nowaday. technology never end. Consider ourself lucky that Pci-E doesn't get any upgrade soon, otherwise, owners of 8-series will be crying if they wanna chase the new slot designs. Like soulfly said earlier, users of S939 will continue to wait and wait for AM3 to AM4 and so on, coz currently the S939 with 2Gb of rams and a good Graphic card is already performing at its best, mayb got problem with future DX10 games only but the rest of the time, the system is still stable and fast for most tasks. Keypoint here is: our software don't need AM3 to run, even the S754 is sufficient for daily work in XP, only Vista reqs a higher-specs rig. |
|
|
May 4 2007, 02:25 PM
|
|
Elite
8,545 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: 224.0.0.6 |
QUOTE(jy14 @ May 4 2007, 01:54 PM) True enuf, thats y u guys should upgrade according to ur needs. For example, if AM2 is sufficient for now, just get a good mobo that supports it, then upgrade to the best X2 or FX that u can afford. Then the rest is just about ur graphic card and also the amount of memory and HDD needed. After all, for office work, BT, internet and chat, any X2 is more than sufficient at the moment, for the games, u just need to upgrade ur graphic cards. True... but computer technology is evolved too fast (my money invest fly fast too) Consider ourself lucky that Pci-E doesn't get any upgrade soon, otherwise, owners of 8-series will be crying if they wanna chase the new slot designs. Like soulfly said earlier, users of S939 will continue to wait and wait for AM3 to AM4 and so on, coz currently the S939 with 2Gb of rams and a good Graphic card is already performing at its best, mayb got problem with future DX10 games only but the rest of the time, the system is still stable and fast for most tasks. Keypoint here is: our software don't need AM3 to run, even the S754 is sufficient for daily work in XP, only Vista reqs a higher-specs rig. Just hoping Agena core can use current am2 mobo :pray: -pWs- |
|
|
May 4 2007, 03:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
824 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: P J |
QUOTE(-pWs- @ May 4 2007, 02:25 PM) True... but computer technology is evolved too fast (my money invest fly fast too) Well, it's the advancement in science and technology, but, when we really think of it properly, does ur MS Words, Firefox, or IE or those common software reqs Quadcore ? As far as I know, at the moment, only games reqs a better processor, therefore, any X2 is sufficient for daily usage. Mayb when the price of AM3 and DDR3 matures, then only we start to move into that direction lo. Anyway, an upgrade every 2 years is quite ok in my opinion, not too fast, not too slow.Just hoping Agena core can use current am2 mobo :pray: -pWs- |
|
|
May 4 2007, 03:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,413 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Shah Alam |
I think Kuma and Agena will be the last products of AM2, or at least those are the only product of AM2+
|
|
|
May 4 2007, 03:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,294 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Putrajaya ~ Johor |
is it really in 2008..really want to make a new pc
hmm so afraid like the last time i buy the s939..then there come out the am2 the price will alys go down really quick |
|
|
May 4 2007, 03:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
10,544 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: GMT +8:00 |
|
|
|
May 4 2007, 04:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,060 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang / PJ |
QUOTE(ikanayam @ May 4 2007, 03:40 PM) hahaha, maybe 10 years later we can even plug & play USB port/ SATA port onto some sockets on the mobo, depends on how great is the IOHub. Well, dunno it can be achieved or not, just some day dreaming since i've finished work much earlier than expected This post has been edited by charge-n-go: May 4 2007, 04:50 PM |
|
|
May 4 2007, 06:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,257 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(charge-n-go @ May 4 2007, 09:53 AM) Actually AM2+ is misleading consumers in some way. but is it possible that am2+ will be based on ddr3?Back in socket A, every chipset change with higher FSB support doesnt change the name of the socket. We never see Socket A, Socket A+, Socket A++ or whatever. Now, AMD decided to change the naming when the system bus is upgraded. AM2+ is a good example. It is exactly the same as AM2 socket, but with a different chipset and system bus, that's all. AM2 --> AM2+ is as simple as Socket A with VIA KT333 --> socket A with VIA KT400A. |
|
|
May 4 2007, 10:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,413 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Shah Alam |
QUOTE(Radeon @ May 4 2007, 06:57 PM) Err I don't think so. Maybe AM2+ is the proc only since it can run on AM2. Agena and Kuma maybe will be produced in AM2+ and also AM3, just like the previous procs 939 and AM2. Same proc, different socket. I assume AM3 with DDR3. |
|
|
May 4 2007, 11:53 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,827 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Here On The Chair Status : Eating Donut |
QUOTE(charge-n-go @ May 4 2007, 12:24 PM) Maybe one day we can change the IO Hub on our own based on the features we want. But this will very far away from now. want to know what she just msg me?...So easily snap pictures? I am expecting they are top secrets, maybe ur cousin should not even tell you about it. QUOTE pin already change up to 1207.Higher FSB compare to intel extreme coz 4 core on 1 silicon die=4x1.intel 2x2 core so lack in processing data and FSB.1st revision got 2 type,server n desktop.expected launch julai-october.latest device 8 core use same tech as intel 4 core extreme but use 2x4 core. This post has been edited by Oly: May 4 2007, 11:53 PM |
|
|
May 5 2007, 01:05 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
ya.. agree with jy14, its even impossible to fully consume the dual cores now, even u open up to 5 HD videos simultaneously
This post has been edited by dattebayo: May 5 2007, 01:05 AM |
|
|
May 5 2007, 01:10 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,569 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
|
|
|
May 5 2007, 08:08 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
808 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
QUOTE(Oly @ May 4 2007, 11:53 PM) QUOTE(Oly @ May 4 2007, 11:53 PM) pin already change up to 1207.Higher FSB compare to intel extreme coz 4 core on 1 silicon die=4x1.intel 2x2 core so lack in processing data and FSB.1st revision got 2 type,server n desktop.expected launch julai-october.latest device 8 core use same tech as intel 4 core extreme but use 2x4 core. |
|
|
May 5 2007, 09:50 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
848 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Ipoh Perak Malaysia |
OH MAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i dun like dis type of news....... 2008... hmm still far.... maybe i shud overclock my AM2 kaw kaw.... den upgrade to AM3 |
|
|
May 5 2007, 10:02 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: No longer hanging by a NUS |
QUOTE(Oly @ May 4 2007, 11:53 PM) QUOTE pin already change up to 1207.Higher FSB compare to intel extreme coz 4 core on 1 silicon die=4x1.intel 2x2 core so lack in processing data and FSB.1st revision got 2 type,server n desktop.expected launch julai-october.latest device 8 core use same tech as intel 4 core extreme but use 2x4 core. 1. 1207 pin/pad = socket F which has been around for a while. 2. Intel 2x2 core has been proven to be quite kick-ass despite the FSB bottleneck. Going to overlook the FSB snafu your cousin made for now. 3. K10 launches in 2H07 but it's going to be a soft launch; Hector himself has confirmed they can only ramp in 08. 4. AMD using MCM approach!? I can picture Henri Richards spinning that one. Oh BTW be careful of disclosing info on public forums. Your cousin might not have a job next time. You don't see me or chargie yapping about what's coming unless it's already announced. |
|
|
May 5 2007, 04:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,995 posts Joined: May 2005 |
AMD wont simply throw in AM3 unless the DDR3 make it to main stream market..... AMD would lost a lot of market share then.......
|
|
|
May 5 2007, 05:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,827 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Here On The Chair Status : Eating Donut |
QUOTE(cks2k2 @ May 5 2007, 10:02 AM) 1. 1207 pin/pad = socket F which has been around for a while. ok2...will not tell to anyone...my last msg about this AMD thinggy...save her job...2. Intel 2x2 core has been proven to be quite kick-ass despite the FSB bottleneck. Going to overlook the FSB snafu your cousin made for now. 3. K10 launches in 2H07 but it's going to be a soft launch; Hector himself has confirmed they can only ramp in 08. 4. AMD using MCM approach!? I can picture Henri Richards spinning that one. Oh BTW be careful of disclosing info on public forums. Your cousin might not have a job next time. You don't see me or chargie yapping about what's coming unless it's already announced. |
|
|
May 5 2007, 08:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
577 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Random |
|
|
|
May 5 2007, 09:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,413 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Shah Alam |
QUOTE(GeneralX @ May 5 2007, 08:32 PM) Found some info regarding AM2+ & AM3 in Wikipedia, might be useful ... 940 and AM2 is different, although AM2 sometimes referred as 940. 940 is for most Opterons.AM2+ AM3 Seems AM2, AM2+ & AM3 share a similarity; the 940-contact socket. Just wondering, how is it AM2 proc will fit into AM3 board, but AM3 proc will NOT fit into AM2 board? |
|
|
May 5 2007, 10:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
577 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Random |
QUOTE(afosz @ May 5 2007, 09:00 PM) 940 and AM2 is different, although AM2 sometimes referred as 940. 940 is for most Opterons. Just wondering, how is it AM2 proc will fit into AM3 board, but AM3 proc will NOT fit into AM2 board? I think it has something to do with HyperTransport. Well, that's of what I heard of. This post has been edited by GeneralX: May 5 2007, 10:43 PM |
|
|
May 5 2007, 10:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,569 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
|
|
|
May 6 2007, 03:44 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13 |
take a look at this... no more athlon.. here comes phenom
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/05/04/am...m_details_leak/ http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/05/03/am...gh-end_athlons/ http://dailytech.com/AMD+to+Drop+Athlon+Mo...article7136.htm http://dailytech.com/More+Details+on+AMD+S...article7147.htm http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39381 This post has been edited by casperito: May 6 2007, 03:56 AM |
|
|
May 8 2007, 10:48 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,294 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Putrajaya ~ Johor |
will come in 2008...waa next-gen pc
|
|
|
May 8 2007, 03:16 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
808 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
guess what, the newest rumours has it that AMD goin to demo barcelona ...again
|
|
|
May 8 2007, 09:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,238 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(ikanayam @ May 3 2007, 08:57 AM) to obey Moore's law or else he will wake up from his graveAnyway, what is the purpose of creating faster and faster processors, they should focus more on implementing 64bit computing and perhaps 64bit processors that can handle 32bit computing under a 64bit OS environment |
|
|
May 8 2007, 09:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: No longer hanging by a NUS |
QUOTE(karhoe @ May 8 2007, 09:00 PM) to obey Moore's law or else he will wake up from his grave Mr. Moore is still alive and kicking; you can put down the anti-zombie shotgun.QUOTE Anyway, what is the purpose of creating faster and faster processors, they should focus more on implementing 64bit computing and perhaps 64bit processors that can handle 32bit computing under a 64bit OS environment Ever heard of "Andy giveth, Bill taketh away"?64-bit is old news. Multi-core/insanely-threaded is in. |
|
|
May 9 2007, 03:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,294 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Putrajaya ~ Johor |
multi core...some game need multicore to have great game ply
|
|
|
May 9 2007, 03:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
808 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
|
|
|
May 16 2007, 01:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
328 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL |
QUOTE(-pWs- @ May 4 2007, 08:59 AM) zzz...AM3 again...AMD changing the socket too fast i think Remember P4? It started with 423 with RDRAM, then they kill the RDRAM, change to DDR, switch to 478, then later 775, change to DDR2, and finally they kill the P4 itself. Bad news for AM2 users like me ...:SAD: -pWs- Best part is, after 3 sockets, then only they admit that netburst is a failure Now, they revise the old P3 technology, which was altered for P-M, improve it a lil' bit, and voila! The 'NEW' technology; CORE 2!!! Now, It's AMD's turn. One thing though, changing chipset doesn't really need them to change the sockets actually. Like Intel, they change chipsets so it will support new technologies; i.e: DDR->DDR2, SATA->SATA2, etc. It's easy for them because the northbridge is not embedded on the CPU itself. so they can just dump everything without having to change the socket, unlike AMD. Changing from 478 to 775 was also because of the FSB ceiling. They can't go any further, thus they have to change to new architecture to move forward in the gigahertz race. Now, even when there's new CPU or chipset coming, they can still use the same socket, and it's backward compatible. So users can just change the motherboard without having to change the CPU. Unless AMD take a step backward, and remove the northbridge from the CPU, I myself think that they will keep changing sockets everytime there's new technology emerge. 754=single channel, 939=dual channel, AM2=DDR2, AM3=DDR3 and so on... Cheers p/s: ''membebel" n "mengarut" mode = on. This post has been edited by Fries: May 16 2007, 01:26 PM |
|
|
May 16 2007, 01:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,067 posts Joined: May 2005 |
2008 will cause a big hole in my wallet...
nx gen console - PS3....now nx gen pc - AM3!! better start saving now... |
|
|
May 16 2007, 02:37 PM
|
|
Elite
6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
wei ikan question for u
hmm the latest cards with the best cpu .. still end up being cpu bound right.. so when will proc catch up to gpu until u can buy a balance system?? |
|
|
May 16 2007, 03:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
10,544 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: GMT +8:00 |
|
|
|
May 23 2007, 01:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,294 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Putrajaya ~ Johor |
but still the price for am2 and ddr3 when it launch will be very high...
|
|
|
May 23 2007, 02:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
am2 is vice versa with the am3..
more cheaper to upgrade and upgrade 1 by 1 |
|
|
May 23 2007, 05:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,201 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
can't wait for 45nm chip out...my mobo already for 45nm chip but not for ddr3
[intel]...maybe save budget to get mobo am3 future |
| Change to: | 0.0339sec
0.55
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 09:23 PM |