QUOTE(arjuna_mfna @ May 3 2007, 10:37 AM)
maybe amd bypass am2+... 
that means no barcelona, kuma and agena[wtf] AM3/DDR3/45nm in 2008?
|
|
 May 3 2007, 10:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
2,257 posts Joined: Jan 2003  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
May 3 2007, 10:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
2,257 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
they are on am2+
|
|
|
May 4 2007, 09:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
2,257 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(dattebayo @ May 3 2007, 08:00 PM) Why they want to put in some transition product like AM2+ , nth difference than AM2 except HT 3.0 and better power saving it is because this thing has been planned years before and there is no ddr3 on the market now, amd have to do something else they gonna lose more moneyi recommend the next upgrade should bypass AM2+  |
|
|
May 4 2007, 06:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
2,257 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(charge-n-go @ May 4 2007, 09:53 AM) Actually AM2+ is misleading consumers in some way. but is it possible that am2+ will be based on ddr3?Back in socket A, every chipset change with higher FSB support doesnt change the name of the socket. We never see Socket A, Socket A+, Socket A++ or whatever. Now, AMD decided to change the naming when the system bus is upgraded. AM2+ is a good example. It is exactly the same as AM2 socket, but with a different chipset and system bus, that's all. AM2 --> AM2+ is as simple as Socket A with VIA KT333 --> socket A with VIA KT400A. |
| Change to: |  0.0171sec
 1.06
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 08:13 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.