Firstly, the writer tries to be funny putting in some ancient plot to the review. It is very difficult to understand what he means, I cant really make out how he decide who wins in most of the categories specified. Secondly the writer obviously don't use OSX, he don't seem to know much about it.
http://asia.cnet.com/reviews/notebooks/0,3...009711-1,00.htm
Some of those that I cant agree on:-
QUOTE
We can find a winner even without resorting to talk of clock cycles and gigaflops. PCs are definitely the place to go if you want the latest technology.
QUOTE
OS X doesn't do itself many favors, though. Why, after all these years can you not resize documents or applications by clicking any corner of the window? Why does Apple subscribe to the "mystery meat" school of navigation, where the "minimize", "maximize" and "close window" buttons at the top-left of a pane all look identical until you hover over them? Why doesn't the delete key let you delete files? Why instead do we have to press the Apple plus backspace keys? Using OS X is, at times, a bit like eating in the dark.
Oh, and where are the OS X games? And why does Front Row feel like the poor, backwards relation of Windows Media Center?
Oh, and where are the OS X games? And why does Front Row feel like the poor, backwards relation of Windows Media Center?
QUOTE
The maiden counts to ten, her voice trembling with fear. Our combatants take ten paces and it's Baron Vista who turns first. He discharges his weapon a fraction of a second before Count OS X can pull the trigger, striking the Apple follower in the leg, drawing blood and ruining his outfit. This is the most hurtful injury an OS X user could endure.
The reasons behind this outcome are manifold. Count OS X had other things on his mind at the time of the shootout. He was perturbed by his Internet service provider's lack of support for Macs, and he was annoyed that his poncy outfit, which he paid over the odds for, was soiled during the fray.
There's also an element of karma to it. According to Greenpeace, PCs are greener than their Mac brethren. A Mac "scores badly on almost all criteria", and Apple "fails to embrace the precautionary principle, withholds its full list of regulated substances and provides no timelines for eliminating toxics polyvinyl chloride (PVC)".
Vista Wins!
The reasons behind this outcome are manifold. Count OS X had other things on his mind at the time of the shootout. He was perturbed by his Internet service provider's lack of support for Macs, and he was annoyed that his poncy outfit, which he paid over the odds for, was soiled during the fray.
There's also an element of karma to it. According to Greenpeace, PCs are greener than their Mac brethren. A Mac "scores badly on almost all criteria", and Apple "fails to embrace the precautionary principle, withholds its full list of regulated substances and provides no timelines for eliminating toxics polyvinyl chloride (PVC)".
Vista Wins!
Wish I have a punching bag...
Apr 30 2007, 09:21 PM, updated 19y ago
Quote
0.0179sec
1.43
5 queries
GZIP Disabled