Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Video camera!, which one is better??overall performance

views
     
TSquick_shaq
post Apr 29 2007, 02:32 AM, updated 19y ago

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
872 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: subang jaya-shah alam


i was just wondering ...which one of all of this is the best rclxub.gif ... i'm planning to buy one later on ..but still wondering about this....anyone with experince could share tips n suggestion rclxms.gif
greyPJ
post Apr 29 2007, 09:15 AM

artificially stupid
*******
Senior Member
3,169 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
DV tape camera - will give you endless pain, capture till you die.
DVD video camera - will give you endless error. read/write you name it.
HDD video camera - quite fragile, one knock you loss everything, the best among these 3.

but i'd buy this:
user posted image

canon tx1, good video quality, pocketable, very small, can take still picture, use sd card, wait for 8gb sdhc price to drop.
sir_impesto
post Apr 29 2007, 11:23 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
729 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur


in term of the quality, I guess MiniDV is the best....but consume time to convert it into the digital one.


ckkean
post Apr 29 2007, 09:29 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
807 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: Seri Kembangan


Mini DV is the best quality but very troublesome for video-transfering & editing

This post has been edited by ckkean: Apr 29 2007, 09:42 PM
Ryo
post Apr 30 2007, 04:27 AM

.:: Rise Lord Vader ::.
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: A Galaxy Far Far Away...


HDD! no need to convert
TSquick_shaq
post Apr 30 2007, 08:27 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
872 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: subang jaya-shah alam


if using HDD camera...what format will it be when transfer to comp???
my fren use the JVC one the format was nvr seen b4 ..so need to be converted before editing...grumble.gif


Added on May 1, 2007, 10:42 amno one got any idea on this huh ?

This post has been edited by quick_shaq: May 1 2007, 10:42 AM
sotong168
post May 1 2007, 12:50 PM

in retiring mode
*******
Senior Member
5,291 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: I Luv Msia
QUOTE(ckkean @ Apr 29 2007, 09:29 PM)
Mini DV is the best quality but very troublesome for video-transfering & editing
*
it's quite fun for me and it's flexible to edit, of course the user must has the interest in video editing 1st wink.gif
afs
post May 1 2007, 02:04 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
294 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ


QUOTE(sir_impesto @ Apr 29 2007, 11:23 AM)
in term of the quality, I guess MiniDV is the best....but consume time to convert it into the digital one.
*
Mini DV is the best? Really? I've been using Mini DV since 2002 and thought of changing to HDD, but if Mini DV is the best might just continue using it. Yea, transferring and editing takes too much of your time.

This post has been edited by afs: May 1 2007, 02:05 PM
sotong168
post May 1 2007, 03:03 PM

in retiring mode
*******
Senior Member
5,291 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: I Luv Msia
QUOTE(afs @ May 1 2007, 02:04 PM)
Mini DV is the best? Really? I've been using Mini DV since 2002 and thought of changing to HDD,  but if Mini DV is the best might just continue using it. Yea, transferring and editing takes too much of your time.
*
if u read thru reviews on web, many commented that DV is still the best in picture quality; unless u willing to dump the $ into HD capable HDD camcorder (~RM6K) sweat.gif , i suppose the performance is on par
TSquick_shaq
post May 1 2007, 07:13 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
872 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: subang jaya-shah alam


the price for HD cam by sony is damn expensive..all vid cam is also RM5999
but if go to camera shop the price is much2 cheaper but still kinda high for video cam lar..for the DV one it would be around 3400 like that..
i guess it's true that DV is the best since all the tv stations and recording of tv shows also still use DV camera just in HD....
i got to know that DV camera is half analog and half digital..
if DVD and HDD is fully digital..the video output is not that great as DV..
DV takes a lot of time huh???
that's the only set back...


sotong168
post May 1 2007, 09:00 PM

in retiring mode
*******
Senior Member
5,291 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: I Luv Msia
QUOTE(quick_shaq @ May 1 2007, 07:13 PM)
DV takes a lot of time huh???
that's the only set back...
*
DV capturing takes 1:1 time of the length, that is if u record for one hour video, capturing frm DV to PC would take one hour as well; at this stage, u can burn as DVD. But if u want to do editing, then that would take u some time but that is fun to me.
TSquick_shaq
post May 2 2007, 12:06 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
872 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: subang jaya-shah alam


since i'm a mass communication student with all the projects to come ..i think i'll go for the mini DV...since editing should be a skill that is good to have..
and i agree on what u said ... it could be fun thumbup.gif
afs
post May 2 2007, 12:32 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
294 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ


What editing software do u normally use? I tried a few and end up using Ulead VideoStudio Ver 6 until now. To me its good enough. Or is it too outdated?
sotong168
post May 2 2007, 05:51 AM

in retiring mode
*******
Senior Member
5,291 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: I Luv Msia
QUOTE(afs @ May 2 2007, 12:32 AM)
What editing software do u normally use? I tried a few and end up using Ulead VideoStudio Ver 6 until now. To me its good enough. Or is it too outdated?
*
i'm doing it for my family/friends/trip events, i found cyberlink powerdirector 6 caters all my needs, adobe premiere is way too sophisticated for me
sir_impesto
post May 2 2007, 09:18 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
729 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur



Just convert it, then leave it as u can have lunch or doing sumthing else while converting it. It's not a big deal though...
videoman
post May 3 2007, 11:48 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
97 posts

Joined: Jul 2006


TAPE or DVD or HDD

For me being in the industry of video filming, TAPE is still the choice and the best. Cause it allows you to capture in RAW mode or actuall quality. We need this for our work as to deliver good videos.

Cant use DVD or HDD cameras as it captures at mpeg quality...already compressed. AVI is more friendly to edit. Though I have waste a lot of time while capturing but you can always do something else while it is capturing.

If you want short cut or easy work then TAPE is not the choice for you.

lightning69
post May 6 2007, 01:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,298 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri, Sarawak


QUOTE(greyPJ @ Apr 29 2007, 09:15 AM)
DV tape camera - will give you endless pain, capture till you die.
DVD video camera - will give you endless error. read/write you name it.
HDD video camera - quite fragile, one knock you loss everything, the best among these 3.

but i'd buy this:
user posted image

canon tx1, good video quality, pocketable, very small, can take still picture, use sd card, wait for 8gb sdhc price to drop.
*
Is this thing on the market already? How much is it?


Added on May 16, 2007, 9:39 amAfter much searching I finally bought the canon tx1. So far I'm very impress with the video quality both in 480x640 and 720p mode. I think its much better than any previos minidv that i have seen. The downside is that the filesize is very huge but at least the process of transfering video to PC is very easy and fast. Just copy & paste just like pendrive.



This post has been edited by lightning69: May 16 2007, 09:39 AM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0421sec    0.72    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 01:38 PM