Video camera!, which one is better??overall performance
Video camera!, which one is better??overall performance
|
|
Apr 29 2007, 02:32 AM, updated 19y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
872 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: subang jaya-shah alam |
i was just wondering ...which one of all of this is the best
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 29 2007, 09:15 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,169 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
DV tape camera - will give you endless pain, capture till you die.
DVD video camera - will give you endless error. read/write you name it. HDD video camera - quite fragile, one knock you loss everything, the best among these 3. but i'd buy this: ![]() canon tx1, good video quality, pocketable, very small, can take still picture, use sd card, wait for 8gb sdhc price to drop. |
|
|
Apr 29 2007, 11:23 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
729 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
in term of the quality, I guess MiniDV is the best....but consume time to convert it into the digital one. |
|
|
Apr 29 2007, 09:29 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
807 posts Joined: Dec 2005 From: Seri Kembangan |
Mini DV is the best quality but very troublesome for video-transfering & editing
This post has been edited by ckkean: Apr 29 2007, 09:42 PM |
|
|
Apr 30 2007, 04:27 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
871 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: A Galaxy Far Far Away... |
HDD! no need to convert
|
|
|
Apr 30 2007, 08:27 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
872 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: subang jaya-shah alam |
if using HDD camera...what format will it be when transfer to comp???
my fren use the JVC one the format was nvr seen b4 ..so need to be converted before editing... Added on May 1, 2007, 10:42 amno one got any idea on this huh ? This post has been edited by quick_shaq: May 1 2007, 10:42 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
May 1 2007, 12:50 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,291 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: I Luv Msia |
|
|
|
May 1 2007, 02:04 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PJ |
QUOTE(sir_impesto @ Apr 29 2007, 11:23 AM) in term of the quality, I guess MiniDV is the best....but consume time to convert it into the digital one. Mini DV is the best? Really? I've been using Mini DV since 2002 and thought of changing to HDD, but if Mini DV is the best might just continue using it. Yea, transferring and editing takes too much of your time.This post has been edited by afs: May 1 2007, 02:05 PM |
|
|
May 1 2007, 03:03 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,291 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: I Luv Msia |
QUOTE(afs @ May 1 2007, 02:04 PM) Mini DV is the best? Really? I've been using Mini DV since 2002 and thought of changing to HDD, but if Mini DV is the best might just continue using it. Yea, transferring and editing takes too much of your time. if u read thru reviews on web, many commented that DV is still the best in picture quality; unless u willing to dump the $ into HD capable HDD camcorder (~RM6K) |
|
|
May 1 2007, 07:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
872 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: subang jaya-shah alam |
the price for HD cam by sony is damn expensive..all vid cam is also RM5999
but if go to camera shop the price is much2 cheaper but still kinda high for video cam lar..for the DV one it would be around 3400 like that.. i guess it's true that DV is the best since all the tv stations and recording of tv shows also still use DV camera just in HD.... i got to know that DV camera is half analog and half digital.. if DVD and HDD is fully digital..the video output is not that great as DV.. DV takes a lot of time huh??? that's the only set back... |
|
|
May 1 2007, 09:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,291 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: I Luv Msia |
QUOTE(quick_shaq @ May 1 2007, 07:13 PM) DV capturing takes 1:1 time of the length, that is if u record for one hour video, capturing frm DV to PC would take one hour as well; at this stage, u can burn as DVD. But if u want to do editing, then that would take u some time but that is fun to me. |
|
|
May 2 2007, 12:06 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
872 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: subang jaya-shah alam |
since i'm a mass communication student with all the projects to come ..i think i'll go for the mini DV...since editing should be a skill that is good to have..
and i agree on what u said ... it could be fun |
|
|
May 2 2007, 12:32 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PJ |
What editing software do u normally use? I tried a few and end up using Ulead VideoStudio Ver 6 until now. To me its good enough. Or is it too outdated?
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2 2007, 05:51 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,291 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: I Luv Msia |
QUOTE(afs @ May 2 2007, 12:32 AM) What editing software do u normally use? I tried a few and end up using Ulead VideoStudio Ver 6 until now. To me its good enough. Or is it too outdated? i'm doing it for my family/friends/trip events, i found cyberlink powerdirector 6 caters all my needs, adobe premiere is way too sophisticated for me |
|
|
May 2 2007, 09:18 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
729 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
Just convert it, then leave it as u can have lunch or doing sumthing else while converting it. It's not a big deal though... |
|
|
May 3 2007, 11:48 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
97 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
TAPE or DVD or HDD
For me being in the industry of video filming, TAPE is still the choice and the best. Cause it allows you to capture in RAW mode or actuall quality. We need this for our work as to deliver good videos. Cant use DVD or HDD cameras as it captures at mpeg quality...already compressed. AVI is more friendly to edit. Though I have waste a lot of time while capturing but you can always do something else while it is capturing. If you want short cut or easy work then TAPE is not the choice for you. |
|
|
May 6 2007, 01:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,298 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri, Sarawak |
QUOTE(greyPJ @ Apr 29 2007, 09:15 AM) DV tape camera - will give you endless pain, capture till you die. Is this thing on the market already? How much is it?DVD video camera - will give you endless error. read/write you name it. HDD video camera - quite fragile, one knock you loss everything, the best among these 3. but i'd buy this: ![]() canon tx1, good video quality, pocketable, very small, can take still picture, use sd card, wait for 8gb sdhc price to drop. Added on May 16, 2007, 9:39 amAfter much searching I finally bought the canon tx1. So far I'm very impress with the video quality both in 480x640 and 720p mode. I think its much better than any previos minidv that i have seen. The downside is that the filesize is very huge but at least the process of transfering video to PC is very easy and fast. Just copy & paste just like pendrive. This post has been edited by lightning69: May 16 2007, 09:39 AM |
| Change to: | 0.0422sec
0.92
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 01:37 PM |