Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
8-Core Intel Xeon 'V8" Sneak Peek, The V8 is coming...
|
TSbinary
|
 Apr 26 2007, 08:55 PM, updated 19y ago
|
|
8-Core Intel Xeon 'V8' Sneak Peek - Dual Quads - The Processor Arithmetic and Multimedia benchmark scores are more than double those of a Core 2 Duo QX6800!!  QUOTE If you flip through the SiSoft SANDRA screenshots above you see just how much raw horsepower is lurking under this rig's hood. The Processor Arithmetic and Multimedia benchmark scores are more than double those of a Core 2 Duo QX6800. And the Memory Bandwidth benchmark reported maximum bandwidth scores in the neighborhood of 4GB/s, which is low by today's standards and about 1GB/s off the mark set by the QX6800.
We also ran a default 3DMark06 test and a multi-threaded Cinebench v9.5 benchmark on this rig and were thoroughly impressed. The overall 3Dmark06 score was 13,002 (SM2.0=5,104 / HDR & SM3.0=4,932); the CPU score was 6,556 - almost 500 points higher than the rig Intel was showing off at CES. And the rig completed the Cinebench rendering pass in only 10 seconds, which is about 4-5 seconds faster then a quad-core Core 2 Extreme QX6800. Source : http://www.hothardware.comThis post has been edited by binary: Apr 26 2007, 08:58 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
linux11
|
Apr 26 2007, 09:00 PM
|
Getting Started
|
dual socket quad core on 1.33GHz FSB using FBDIMM.. cough cough..
|
|
|
|
|
|
phunkydude
|
May 17 2007, 09:54 PM
|
|
|
watttt? i thought it's already on-sale...
for example..., apple octa-cores.. which uses 2 quads xeons on a server board w/ server rams..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenixwunin
|
May 17 2007, 09:56 PM
|
|
|
omg... wonder what sort of power does it requires.. watt consuming??
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSInF.anime
|
May 17 2007, 10:08 PM
|
|
|
not far away from 50 cores era... power efficient robot/machine will dominate. We must stop Intel b4 too late.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xonius
|
May 17 2007, 10:27 PM
|
|
|
8 cores? blargh, thats 2x quad core processor only. Havent u guys heard? Intel has successfully created an 80 core yes, 80 core chip processor! and no its not 20 quad cores, its a single chip 80 core processor. Not to mention that each core is clocked at 3.1 Ghz!
there's even another company who has created 96 cores on a single chip, called ClearSpeed.
i really cant imagine on what will happen in the next 10 years!
|
|
|
|
|
|
jinaun
|
May 17 2007, 11:19 PM
|
where are my stars???
|
QUOTE(Xonius @ May 17 2007, 10:27 PM) 8 cores? blargh, thats 2x quad core processor only. Havent u guys heard? Intel has successfully created an 80 core yes, 80 core chip processor! and no its not 20 quad cores, its a single chip 80 core processor. Not to mention that each core is clocked at 3.1 Ghz! there's even another company who has created 96 cores on a single chip, called ClearSpeed. i really cant imagine on what will happen in the next 10 years! please be informed that the 80 core processor is just simple 80 ALU coupled together and onli specialized in certain calculation not a general purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
Xonius
|
May 17 2007, 11:38 PM
|
|
|
yes i know, i'm saying it in a general perspective.
|
|
|
|
|
|
y0!
|
May 18 2007, 12:08 AM
|
New Member
|
wah....Powerful...
|
|
|
|
|
|
gtoforce
|
May 18 2007, 12:10 AM
|
|
|
hmmm....
the terra core (80 core) is here
if it can do simple ALU calculations, it can be made for the masses u know
to kira all the 0's and 1's in windows (reminded me of The Matrix)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ikanayam
|
May 18 2007, 12:36 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(gtoforce @ May 17 2007, 11:10 AM) hmmm.... the terra core (80 core) is here if it can do simple ALU calculations, it can be made for the masses u know to kira all the 0's and 1's in windows (reminded me of The Matrix) Sure, once you find a way to program 80 cores for general apps, let us know. |
|
|
|
|
|
hiroshi
|
May 18 2007, 09:42 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(y0! @ May 18 2007, 12:08 AM) IBM Blue Gene/L with 131,072 processors is more powerful.  |
|
|
|
|
|
cks2k2
|
May 18 2007, 10:26 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(hiroshi @ May 18 2007, 09:42 AM) IBM Blue Gene/L with 131,072 processors is more powerful. This thread has lost all meaning...  |
|
|
|
|
|
BurgerRI
|
May 20 2007, 10:09 AM
|
|
|
8 cores on a chip...wow...cool man..... just imagine the cost of your software licences...especially those that charge based on core....like Oracle.... price will be X8 for 8 cores...lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
arjuna_mfna
|
May 20 2007, 10:22 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(BurgerRI @ May 20 2007, 10:09 AM) 8 cores on a chip...wow...cool man..... just imagine the cost of your software licences...especially those that charge based on core....like Oracle.... price will be X8 for 8 cores...lol no la, the review shows 2x quad core proc... see the link at the first post |
|
|
|
|
|
SUSdattebayo
|
May 20 2007, 12:21 PM
|
|
|
in general purpose OS, I dont see the need for 8 cores
|
|
|
|
|
|
X.E.D
|
May 20 2007, 03:24 PM
|
|
|
Captain Obvious strikes again!  They're gonna hit a block in like say, 3 years, then what? Specialized processing units, in massive quantities like IBM's Cell? Death of easy + fast coding, then. |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0140sec
0.78
5 queries
GZIP Disabled