Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Is this considered as gold digging behavior?, Salah siapa?

views
     
SUSNachiino Etamay
post Oct 31 2017, 04:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
93 posts

Joined: Aug 2014
QUOTE(Kim Bi Jan @ Oct 31 2017, 03:51 PM)
nope...no need declare balance sheet
but obviously the guy keeping secret from her
why the guy didnt tell her he's not working and rely on passive income? why need to put on a front that he works as something else?
and why didnt explain to the girl why when she ask?

remember, what TS stated shows that the girl asks this and that..and the guy just go, believe me and shut up..or walk...that's the perception i get..

no communication from the guy when the girl kept asking for info and sharing.

u cant get to know the other person better if he jst keeps quiet on everything

2 way communication needed in a relationship mang..doesnt matter whether ur rich or poor
*
um.

you know that any assets earned BEFORE marriage is owned by you and your family/siblings right?

big big big different.

even if the girl knew this passive income, she has no right to it, because it is earned before marriage, and hence, your side of the family has higher priority of this ammount.

However, i do agree that salary and active income is important to know before marriage

current salary and income ammount is important, because its a shared asset in marriage. both spouses have the right to each other current income.

however, passive asset belongs to you and your parents/siblings, not her.

TLDR:

Assets and future passive income earned before marriage of a person : belongs to the person and the person's family cluster
Active income and future income earned : belongs to the couple as shared assets
Assets purchased after marriage : belongs to the couple as shared assets.

same goes to the girl


This post has been edited by Nachiino Etamay: Oct 31 2017, 04:27 PM
SUSNachiino Etamay
post Oct 31 2017, 04:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
93 posts

Joined: Aug 2014
QUOTE(Kim Bi Jan @ Oct 31 2017, 04:27 PM)
yup..she have no right to it. but at least she dont have to worry their babies dont have enough money to buy pampers

or when go school can only eat half a meal during recess time

some girls are looking for live partner and good environment for her children.....

its disheartening when the mother bring her children out...and they wanna eat that hotdog bun that costs Rm2.80 but if top up another Rm1 then can get a bowl of noodle as complete meal for her children for the day....
*
you're not supposed to use passive income for post-marriage spending.

this money belongs to you and your family. as an eldest son, its my role to keep a healthy amount of property and assets so that i can back my parents if something happen to them.

This money is not meant to be spent for post-wedding expenditure, because its not sustainable.

we should always live within our means.

That means, living within the means of the combined income of a married couple.

imagine if a married couple earn RM10000 combined and spend RM14000 a month just because the guy or girl has an extra house. this doesnt make sense at all, and is not prudent at all.

Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0162sec    0.67    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 08:18 AM