stickers are for live in resident .... not for resident's family who are not living in the house

every house also got 3-4 cars who always visit them, then all give stickers?

seriously TS... read thru ur own post and think about it properly.. what u are proposing makes no sense.

if i live in ur area and u tell me, i'll slap u in the face and ask u to wake up

very soon you'll tell me u have 8 sisters brothers who visits u often and all of them deserve a sticker

STICKER = FOR CARS of PPL WHO LIVE IN THE HOUSE !

i have a feeling that Prof. Jon lives in the same taman as you.

Agree.  Well said
this is why the sticker is called resident sticker.

good days everyone.....

im having problem with my guard gated community (gcc).
we stayed at old taman area with mixture of bungalow, semi D and terrace house.
when we apply for the gcc, the idea is to implement some physical barrier to ensure our safety. majority signed in agreement for the gcc

however, after 2 years, the comittee suddenly decided to give car sticker only for the residents here,not to any family member living outside. i have siblings who stayed outside, just nearby who often visits us often, daily. Those who stayed outside, need to register themselves at the guard booth. i find this new changes rather discomfort for our family member esp those who is very close n regularly attend to visit us. Esp i have a sister who has backache n i cant imagine of her discomfort that has to go out everytime needa to come to my house, esp if raining season

the comittee gives a stupid reason which i still cant accept. they claimed that if they give sticker to family member those living outside,  theres case where the car got stolen and never report to the guard. and the thief used the car to get into the taman n endanger the community. i told them.... thats is so rare case.  we dont have to be too paranoid on rare case. if the resident faces the same scenario, got car stoled but never report n the thief used the car to go into this taman, there will be no different too as resident too may faces similar problem. they are worried a case who has probability of 1 out of 1 000 000

we have many arguement, n as far as i remember, i have never sign in agreement to allow this happen. no meeting done, although they claimed they did n has received majority vote, which i cant take note of it. i cant rememver any such matter arise when i come for meeting

my friend who work as lawyer told me, as long that my sibling ic address still in that taman, they are considered as resident. as resident u cant ve barred from entering. i try to look for specific law that mentioned it. anyone know?

i also try to complain to the authority of these attitude and samseng attitide.... but im worried the authrotiy will demolish the gcc. i want my family to be safe, at the same time i dont want any discomfort caused to my family member who regularly visit us. we are not strata, or new home area. we have live here for almost 40 years. i think watever regulation muat be vased on the custom practice here

good days everyone.....

im having problem with my guard gated community (gcc).
we stayed at old taman area with mixture of bungalow, semi D and terrace house.
when we apply for the gcc, the idea is to implement some physical barrier to ensure our safety. majority signed in agreement for the gcc

however, after 2 years, the comittee suddenly decided to give car sticker only for the residents here,not to any family member living outside. i have siblings who stayed outside, just nearby who often visits us often, daily. Those who stayed outside, need to register themselves at the guard booth. i find this new changes rather discomfort for our family member esp those who is very close n regularly attend to visit us. Esp i have a sister who has backache n i cant imagine of her discomfort that has to go out everytime needa to come to my house, esp if raining season

the comittee gives a stupid reason which i still cant accept. they claimed that if they give sticker to family member those living outside,  theres case where the car got stolen and never report to the guard. and the thief used the car to get into the taman n endanger the community. i told them.... thats is so rare case.  we dont have to be too paranoid on rare case. if the resident faces the same scenario, got car stoled but never report n the thief used the car to go into this taman, there will be no different too as resident too may faces similar problem. they are worried a case who has probability of 1 out of 1 000 000

we have many arguement, n as far as i remember, i have never sign in agreement to allow this happen. no meeting done, although they claimed they did n has received majority vote, which i cant take note of it. i cant rememver any such matter arise when i come for meeting

my friend who work as lawyer told me, as long that my sibling ic address still in that taman, they are considered as resident. as resident u cant ve barred from entering. i try to look for specific law that mentioned it. anyone know?

i also try to complain to the authority of these attitude and samseng attitide.... but im worried the authrotiy will demolish the gcc. i want my family to be safe, at the same time i dont want any discomfort caused to my family member who regularly visit us. we are not strata, or new home area. we have live here for almost 40 years. i think watever regulation muat be vased on the custom practice here

To ts u option is
1. Copy or duplicate sticker..sticker/singnboard /banner shop can do this for you.
2. Just tell community that your sister stay with you and get extra sticker. Or just inform its your car.
3.follow the rules

thats it... theres awlays solution. but my community so sohai... act like samseng

Agreed. The committee explanation is reasonable, as the car sticker is for actual live-in residents. Family members who stays outside, is still an outsiders.

If sign in as visitor susah, u moved out to your brother sister taman lo

yes, these community many times syok sendiri.
one of my house in a small garden area and quite new less than 5 years old. The community decided to make guard house and force everyone to pay up and give max 2 sticker per house. reason for only 2 sticker is so that owner will not over parked their cars disturbing neighbor. obviously some will not be satisfied especially bigger family that has 3-4 cars. then they decided any extra sticker will cost rm50 and sticker will change yearly to make sure ppl pay for the guard service.

since i rented the house, my tenant refuse to pay for the guard nor the sticker because he already stay there before they implement the system and was not willing to pay extras. the community declare that anyone who stay there but do not have sticker will have to self lift up the boom gate prior to entering the area. This created a backlashed and some owner reported to police and mpsj. long story short, the boomgate is always lift up now except at midnight till morning.

the problem is.... when they want to get approval from mpk, such matter never got raised. we never thought our siblings who stay outside n regular visit has to be exempted. if we know early, i wont sign for approval

and lastly, who the hell visits on daily basis late at night when not feeling well? why dont you ask your sister to stay home and rest instead of wasting petrol?

TS family is good people but others may not.
That time blame game again.
Apa lagi residents mau

For comparison, my guarded neighborhood scheme committee gives its residents four stickers with two RFID pass cards to open the auto boom gates (with consideration to have more cards/stickers upon request but they are limited). If you don't pay monthly security fees for more than three months, the committee will automatically bar the cards until you pay. Unless you pay, you have to manually open the auto boom gate by yourself after reporting to the guardhouse. The stickers are just for show to make sure the guards can identify residents' vehicles only. The PBT states a requirement of 100% agreement to have the guarded neighborhood scheme.