Once you go OLED you can't go back...   

I prefer to have both, 120-150" projector with full 7.1.2 / 9.1.2 Atmos setup in a soundproofed room & OLED with soundbar in my bedroom.
The feeling & immersion you get from a Home Cinema Projector is totally different from a smaller 65-77" OLED TV. It feels like you are at the scene, I don't get that feeling with a small sized TV. If you watch 3D this is especially noticeable.

A comparison in Audio would be like Projector -> Live at a Symphony Orchestra vs OLED -> Headphones with dedicated DAC/Amp for precision & clarity. In live venues, you don't get the clarity & precision but you can feel the atmosphere resonating in your bones and heart. While dedicated audiophile headphones/equipment, you get a different feeling. The clarity, emotions of the sound resonates in your heart.

Objectively false .

You can say that as your opinion. But no that isn't true.

Our eyes determine how realistic, how much depth something has via the Dynamic range , which is basically contrast ratio and used to measure how capable every screen is.
A massive screen with poor resolution, low contrast, and bad color accuracy won’t feel immersive, whereas a smaller screen with high resolution, deep blacks, and good HDR can pull you in much more effectively.

(Also the fact that you can sit closer to the screen so it envelops your field of vision more effectively)
Of course the gamechanger being, HDR. A testament on how much the display tech has improved. 2 decades ago, a larger screen means it can better provide immersion. But the innovation of HDR has completely changed the landscape.

I had my 77 " QD OLED seated in a room with controlled ambient light. Whenever a char shows up from a dark background, or multiple stars against a galaxy backdrop , there's a pseudo 3D effect that looks like a portal has just opened up from another reality. You have to witness the floating illusion to understand. Particularly true for QD OLED as they perform impeccably near black.
In an Ideal world, you will want both. But if you are only given one, whichever screen that has higher Contrast ALWAYS wins. The human brains are smart. They don't perceive a piece of washed out cardboard as reality.  Last time I check, the most advanced and pricey projector has still only manage to reach 300 cd/m2 +-. Its color saturation is 1/10 from an OLED screen. Sadly that's light years behind to be able to achieve any sort of HDR effect.

The closest thing you are able to achieve both are via Apple's VR Headset. But even then it still has lower contrast , lower perceived sharpness than OLED TVs***. DSCC has said that the microLED displays can UP TO deliver 5000 nits but a large volume of that is lost due to the lenses and the display driving method.
***A MicroLED lens like Apple's VR do naturally have higher pixel density (~3000 PPI ) against typical OLED TV (~70-100 depends on size). But since you are wearing it upclose and distortion of VR lens, 4k videos look far less pristine on VR headset than on the OLEDs . Sorry Apple fans , your VR headsets do not actually look better than a 2025 OLED TV,  yet.

So now got 2 II and 8 II ?

I will go for the one got hdmi2.1 input plus 120hz refresh rate, cuz more on console gaming and movies 😃🖤

Easy. Just go for King of Oled. 😃 😊

after long time scouting for TV replacement.. online/shop

initial was 65" .. then partner said seems small after looking around at physical shop.. so upgrade option to 75"..

scouting again..

yesterday accidently bought 85" at lazada.. haha.. price cheaper than 75".. 

Toshiba 85Z670MP

what u guys think.. 

Aih.. sori²..
Forgot to add.. typing in middle of something..

Ok. For the 85" listed price Rm5190 when i was scouting.
75" listed price RM5751.

Got it at RM4600 delivered. (minus all available voucer, + rm130 coins equivalent)

I check back price already adjusted for 85" to RM5951

I think thats the cheapest 85" i got for the specs.

Yea.. its very huge .

Yeah.. lucky i guess..

Now need to upgrade Netflix to premium.. 😑
Last time only use FHD 50" tv.

kannnnn... Bravia 3 itself the 75inch i find the price ok but Bravia 3 is entry sony model... so it is just a basic tv haiyahhhh

but 5,7 and 9 comes with XR processor and also 120 hz panel. That's the selling point for them

You got good points on Sony. I also feel it is redundant.

Let me think and see if want 3 or not. I actually aiming for 5 but that's double the amount of 3 at this point. Thank you so much for offering your insights 

fellow peeps who should be more informed about TV tech then me, i got a q:

i want to change my existing 65" oled tv since it doesn't have have earc to support dolby (real waste as i just got a arc ultra, 2x era300, 2x sub4).

Would it be wise for me to go for a qned tv? specifically this - "LG 75-inch QNED92 QNED evo". Would the image quality drop noticeable enough for me to actually regret moving from OLED or QNED?

My budget allows me to go for a 65" oled, but it seems rather stupid to me as i'm practically paying 10k just to get earc port.

Going for 75" oled did not pass the ministry of home finance after just recently having those sonos shipped in...

I have both and mini LED fares better in my bright living room. I was using OLED previously and the brightness is just not good enough in bright room, so I had to move OLED to upstairs living room which is darker and purchase mini LED for living room.

XR50 = Bravia 5- is a spiritual successor(?) of the highly rated Sony X90L series. Sadly it is downgraded and didn't perform as well as predecessors. Sony continues to rely on its excellent picture processing continue to carry its mid-range - upper mid models.

QNED92 = A new gen of LG MINI-LED that is using TCL VA panels instead of the usual IPS . Result is drastically improved contrast and higher peak brightness. But LG has sub-par local dimming compare to others , despite packing better hardware than similar TV models.
TL;DR
XR50 has less impressive hardware but the software side ( upscaling , motion , local dimming etc etc ) makes up for it.
QNED92 has better hardware but the local dimming performance is subpar.
In general they are likely in the same performance bracket.
Whichever you should buy will depend on which you get a better deal out of.

Personally I would gamble on Sony's. LG's LCD remains in the niche category. And yes that is after considering that they have replaced some of their LCD with VA panels.

XR50 = Bravia 5- is a spiritual successor(?) of the highly rated Sony X90L series. Sadly it is downgraded and didn't perform as well as predecessors. Sony continues to rely on its excellent picture processing continue to carry its mid-range - upper mid models.

QNED92 = A new gen of LG MINI-LED that is using TCL VA panels instead of the usual IPS . Result is drastically improved contrast and higher peak brightness. But LG has sub-par local dimming compare to others , despite packing better hardware than similar TV models.
TL;DR
XR50 has less impressive hardware but the software side ( upscaling , motion , local dimming etc etc ) makes up for it.
QNED92 has better hardware but the local dimming performance is subpar.
In general they are likely in the same performance bracket.
Whichever you should buy will depend on which you get a better deal out of.

Personally I would gamble on Sony's. LG's LCD remains in the niche category. And yes that is after considering that they have replaced some of their LCD with VA panels.