QUOTE(neoardi @ Apr 10 2007, 07:16 PM)

U were saying that the ol' DVD better than BD movies.
I'm talking the BD movie with MPEG2 compression, NOT the VC1... so you better check which one that you have... lucky if you have title with VC1 compression...
The earlier version (almost all of the BD movie, at first) were encoded in MPEG2. This is simply no good (blocky image, color problem, ghosting effect, etc). I've a lot of friend in US/Canada, who returned back their BD Player and switched to HD-DVD. Dont have to ask why.
I bought one, "The House of Flying Dagger" and see myself the "great picture" from a BD movie

I was so dissapointed. When I play it on my notebook (the Acer with BD drive), I can see it clearly on the PowerDVD's OSD that the movie was MPEG2 with DD audio track. It has become a "public secret" that BD with MPEG2 is a disaster...
QUOTE
I dont want to argue about this but hv u seen BD movies on the 1080p LCD screens. I've seen it.

The PQ is sooo sharp and the colours are vivid. If u've seen it then u dont want to go back to DVDs (at least for me la

).
BTW, i bought both BD movies @ Amazon.com for *edited*USD28*edited* each and it worth it.
And thanks for ur opinion.
Perhaps you are lucky because you buy newer movie (perhaps encoded in VC1 - I dont know because I dont have that movie). For this case, I have to admit that the PQ is good, just as good (actually totally the same) with HD-DVD quality.
But how about the sound track? Does it use "old" DD track? Too bad for me since, this is the same format with your old DVD. I dont think BD can support PCM uncompressed until Sony can mass product for its dual layer media. Lossless PCM simply can't fit the 25 GB BD single layer.
Thanks

Added on April 10, 2007, 11:21 pmQUOTE(Blackhart @ Apr 10 2007, 09:18 PM)
From what I've heard the earlier BD titles have pretty mediocre picture quality though now the later ones can or at least almost match HD DVD's quality.Haven't personally tested them so I don't know...
Yes you are correct.
The earlier title was poooooorrrrr.... You dont even want to spend US$ 1000-1500 (the price for BD Player at that time) to buy such crappy video (at least at that price point)...
But the latter title (encoded in VC1) should have competitive quality to HD-DVD (actually same quality hehehe).
The final problem is the sound track. BD can't use uncompressed PCM for its single layer BD disc. It just doesnt fit there... So stick with old DD track, unless Sony want to pay more for Dolby TrueHD (as used in HD-DVD).
Added on April 10, 2007, 11:26 pmQUOTE(pixel8 @ Apr 10 2007, 09:11 PM)
This has got to be the first complaint about BD quality.
Perhaps chinese titles are a no no for HD quality dvd.

I think if you search around, there are a lot of people complaining about this "BD with MPEG2 compression"... I dont believe at first, just like you, but when I buy one of the "MPEG2 BD" title, "The House of Flying Dagger" then I have to admit that the complain is totally right...
I think BD will beat HD-DVD because you cant get movie produced by Sony's Studio (and their friends) at HD-DVD format... so, like it or not, you have to buy BD for watching Sony's produced movie...
Anyway, Sony has moved to right path by using VC1... the old MPEG2 or AVC Compression at first used for BD was simply disaster...
This post has been edited by xneakers: Apr 10 2007, 11:26 PM