Lol
What has corruption has to do with this

This post has been edited by Quang1819: Aug 18 2017, 10:01 AM

anything can change..before this PRIMA moratorium 10 years to 5 years..
might POSSIBLE... RUMAWIP, can be rented but to close relatives...who knows

Election is around the corner..hehe

Sooner or later only. Malaysian will always find a way to twist the terms anyway

the headache is the rental term is nt in SPA..... more ways to play with it....

Or is it on purpose one. Perhaps even government wants to play with it lol

What is the difference between RUMAWIP and PRIMA ah

To those blame invester/flipper, RUMAHWIP have set some requirement for buying this unit. As such, those who qualified are consider "1st house owner" so they are not just typical invester/flipper, they are genuine buyer for own stay during S&P time.

so why do people rent their unit?
1) they might be transfer to other state or oversea so no one occupy the unit
2) they might be going back kampung due to high cost of living in KL
3) they might have purchase another unit after sign s&p and decided to stay there instead of RUMAHWIP
4) they might choose to stay with their parent, and use the rent to cover installment (consider now is not very good time in malaysia)

there are definitely more reason, just hope that sour grape dont complaint so much. think of others perspective.

cannot do anything, same happened to pr1ma project
how many times u wan to report

investor/flipper is 1st time buyer? dun think have a lot..or use other ppl name to buy?

husband own a double story, so wife/son/daughter all get a rumahwip for rental = big income.

if not stated in SPA, but only talk talk, shown on the syarat-syarat at the website, technically izit wrong if ppl rent out their unit?

if government want to take action, on what grounds?

right or wrong, already written in the website that rental is not allowed - whatever reasons you have. i think that will probably have some values in court. and of course this news if you guys missed it before this.

http://www.astroawani.com/berita-malaysia/...n-ku-nan-150049

sorry to say, website and news is just 'saying' only.
S&P is the real deal. Black & white have the biggest value in court.

RUMAWIP focused KL area..(Labuan / putrajaya not sure yet)..
PRIMA all around malaysia if not mistaken..

both hv different criterion

well... if blow water on news and written on website consider as strong values in court... then brochures shown by developer can be use against them already whenever their delivery is different from the brochure or websites shown... but in msia this is not the case....

TS I believe you can lodge complaint to the mgmt of the building? Don't they a committee approved by DBKL to manage the condo?

This is exactly the concern many of us had when these RUMAWIP was springing like hot cakes everywhere.

What!
Pr1ma project already happened??

don't be naive. there are a lot of investors buying using other ppl names. father mother brother sister uncle aunty etc. and the requirement is not first property. it is first property in KL. you can own 10 houses in klang valley but still qualify for rumahwip.

i'm not naive, just that there are no black & white on renting matter.
above are just some points that against law maker forbid people from renting.

i'm pandanmas 2 owner by the way.

s&p doesnt mention can rent out either right. so it's your words against dbkl. see who got more resources. lol.