wow. within rumahwip owner also complain. I always thought that only those normal sales buyers / investors will complain. example hamilton cost 550k, confirm very sure to complain at rumahwip beside 198k wangsamas if they rent out. who knows they will even propose to sponsor free cctv installation at every rumahwip floors level. hehehe.
Why so surprise.. It's Malaysia.. We do it openly.. I'm betting they got connection...
Well might do report to MACC.. Since they very busy now catching people...
well if today with only 2 completed RUMAHWIP also cannot cope, what do you expect in years to come when many many more RUMAHWIP VP. will be more than 10k units all over KL. authority got hands and legs to handle all? doubt so.
To those blame invester/flipper, RUMAHWIP have set some requirement for buying this unit. As such, those who qualified are consider "1st house owner" so they are not just typical invester/flipper, they are genuine buyer for own stay during S&P time.
so why do people rent their unit? 1) they might be transfer to other state or oversea so no one occupy the unit 2) they might be going back kampung due to high cost of living in KL 3) they might have purchase another unit after sign s&p and decided to stay there instead of RUMAHWIP 4) they might choose to stay with their parent, and use the rent to cover installment (consider now is not very good time in malaysia)
there are definitely more reason, just hope that sour grape dont complaint so much. think of others perspective.
don't be naive. there are a lot of investors buying using other ppl names. father mother brother sister uncle aunty etc. and the requirement is not first property. it is first property in KL. you can own 10 houses in klang valley but still qualify for rumahwip.
A house is meant to stay but can be investment tool or financial instrument at the same time.. It is considered personal assets tho..
Layman comparison.
Dollar note vs Hard solid property
RM50 10 years ago can buy what? Now with RM50 you can get the same stuff? Value of money decreasing. VS 10 years ago house price at xxx. As compare to now, can you still get the house at the same price? Probably need double the amount or more to own.
nivota you are definitely wrong. property is one sort of investment. can even be force saving like Chinese people do. Buy 1 house per baby born. When they are old enough, sell the house to get money to pay their studies.
its quite obvious that the authorities didnt think about it thoroughly before they launch this plan... those ppa1m also alot of ppl re-rent it out... and the authorities just check it like once in a blue moon... alot of ppl already earned their money and cabut already... haha
ppr flat also can re-rent. rent atas rent. hahaha.
📍 RUMAHWIP, PR1MA, PPA1M, SELANGORKU dan seangkatannya JANGAN sesekali korang buat SUBLET unit ni.
📍 KECUALI kalau ada surat hitam putih yang menyatakan unit tu boleh disewakan oleh pihak yang berkuatkuasa.
📍 Ada banyak lagi unit-unit lain yang korang boleh sublet, kenapa nak pilih unit yang berisiko?
📍 Selain daripada itu, kebarangkalian penduduk sekeliling kacau korang pun ada, sebab diorang tau yang korang tak boleh sewakan unit.
📍 Korang kena kira risiko korang sendiri. Korang da labur dan ikat beberapa tahun, last-last korang kena keluar sebab restriction penyewaan. Kan ke korang bleeding sebab tak balik modal dan rugi terus.
I guess once JMB is formed, the owners can take charge of the no rent policy if they want. If a rumahwip is filled with actual owners > fake investors, then I guess probably the own stay owners will hold majority and implement no renting out ruling.
How JMB is gonna implement this monitoring will be up to the creativity of the people.
got a friend just signed the snp for pr1ma, when ask the lawyer can rent out or not, the lawyer didn't say cannot but juz wink :wink: at him and said no clause in snp stating this condition. so, the answer is???
WEEKENDER ::: What?! Now, RUMAWIP can be rented out legally?!!!
The government will reconsider allowing buyers of the Federal Territories Affordable Housing (RUMAWIP) project to rent out their units, subject to certain conditions.
Federal Territories Minister, Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor, said the ministry will further examine the terms and conditions to allow the buyers to rent out their units.
He said, the government may allow them (RUMAWIP buyers) to rent out their units, if they were forced to transfer to a location far from the city, such as Sarawak for instance.
Of course they can’t just leave the units (empty). The government will look into the matter, but they will only be allowed to rent out their units to locals only. ————————————————————— This news came in as BIG BLOW for all properties investors especially those who bought in the same development with RUMAWIP.
How do the government gonna enforce this new ruling and monitor the situation? The original purpose of RUMAWIP housing scheme is for those 1st time home buyer owned stay and not suppose to be rented out or sell within 10 years period.
This will change the property rental market and gonna compete with private projects development. Good luck to all property investors😉
Is it possible that towards the end of 10 years restriction, the government will come up with another policy that restrict the buyers from selling at market price or something?
I mean, the government initiated this initiative to assist house ownership in the first place. So it would be reasonable for the gov to continue to sell these RUMAWIPs at a certain price which is still 'reasonable' to the next owners in future.
Just a theory haha
already got rumah selangorku fall into lelong Sold according to market price. So nope. No ceiling price.
This post has been edited by AskarPerang: Jan 9 2018, 01:54 PM
I don't understand. How is the owner able to sell of the Rumah Selangorku despite a restriction in selling?
Sold via lelong. Restriction no longer apply there. Same like low cost property.
However i'm not sure whether this new owner who won the units still restrict in selling the unit again or not as per rumah selangorku rules. Since both are leasehold property and required local government consent.