Actualy which Sensor is better? CMOS or CCD?
Which is better, CMOS vs CCD
Which is better, CMOS vs CCD
|
|
Apr 8 2007, 04:07 PM, updated 19y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
961 posts Joined: Apr 2005 |
Actualy which Sensor is better? CMOS or CCD?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 11 2007, 12:51 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
144 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Wangsa Maju x Labuan |
I would say this is quite hard to compare...
Maybe you can go wikipedia or google to find out... Anyway sensor would not be only the reason to choose a camera... |
|
|
Apr 11 2007, 01:13 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
|
Staff
4,380 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: petaling jaya,puchong jaya,pandan jaya,putra jaya |
neither of both up there. i would say a 35mm film will be better.
|
|
|
Apr 11 2007, 01:52 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,695 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
doesn't matter.
as long as it serves the purpose. |
|
|
Apr 13 2007, 04:44 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,758 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Selayang |
Film better ... always better, haha!
|
|
|
Apr 13 2007, 09:36 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,477 posts Joined: Feb 2005 |
last time they say CCD is better...
now they say CMOS technology changed and improved..it is better that CCD confused by marketing tactics.. i rather compare other features though.. This post has been edited by mindkiller6610: Apr 13 2007, 09:37 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 02:49 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,758 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Selayang |
Why confused? Technology always improve, last time carburator, now fuel-injection, last time CCD now CMOS ... what is so difficult to understand?
If you say why they didn't phase out carburator cars and replace all new cars with fuel-injection ones are beyond me, manufacturers have their own reasons. CCD technology also same. |
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 01:24 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,711 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
CMOS takes up less power and noise i think is better as a result of that...
But CCD is an emerging technology, so its really hard to say which is better. The only confusion that it feels that CMOS is lousier is bcos somehow factories create cheap CMOS sets for items such as webcams (lower quality stuff), so you generally associate CMOS sensors with these items... (cameras from China or something like that) But of course, some Canon gurus here will beg to differ... |
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 10:47 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,324 posts Joined: Nov 2006 From: Earth |
las time s700 using ccd sensor,the image tat capture is in good quality...
|
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 11:02 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,544 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong/Singapore |
http://www.dalsa.com/markets/ccd_vs_cmos.asp
Added on April 14, 2007, 11:04 pmFor us normal consumers, it doesn't matter. The camera manufacturer would have weighed the pros and cons already of a CCD or CMOS sensor and have tweaked it to achieve a required image quality level. If you're in the business of making camera equipment, then maybe you should be concerned of the differences. This post has been edited by cjtune: Apr 14 2007, 11:04 PM |
|
|
Apr 18 2007, 11:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
405 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
best solution is try out urself... see whether u can see the difference.
if u can't, stick with the one which they say is better (after all u can see the difference |
|
|
Apr 19 2007, 12:59 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,695 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
Once I read a photography related book.
It listed the pros & cons of CCD, CMOS & even the FOVEON sensors. In a very impartial & detailed way. But I just skimmed through very quick cos in a rush. So cannot remember much. In short, all of them have their own shortcomings. So how the manufacturer tackle it is most important. |
|
|
Apr 19 2007, 03:36 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,615 posts Joined: Feb 2007 |
Don't forget the lens you put in front of the sensor, plus the brain that takes the picture behind the sensor. These two factors will make more of a difference than CMOS vs. CCD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 19 2007, 06:19 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
744 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Brisbane, Australia |
I see that CCD is more noisy compared to CMOS...
maybe its the software.. hmm |
|
|
Apr 19 2007, 06:24 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
15,278 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
not really, most lauyah CMOS sensors noiser than CCDs, if you wanna play CMOS then use canon
|
|
|
Apr 19 2007, 09:01 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,758 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Selayang |
QUOTE(wlcling @ Apr 14 2007, 01:24 PM) But CCD is an emerging technology, so its really hard to say which is better. Mmm ... I am not any Canon guru but I feel that you're very ill-informed here. The CCD and CMOS technology are invented back in the 1960s, so neither of them are 'emerging technologies'.QUOTE(wlcling @ Apr 14 2007, 01:24 PM) The only confusion that it feels that CMOS is lousier is bcos somehow factories create cheap CMOS sets for items such as webcams (lower quality stuff), so you generally associate CMOS sensors with these items... (cameras from China or something like that) Factories did not CREATE cheap CMOS for China-made cameras. China bulk purchased the sensors and incorporate them into their products, it's a huge difference. Ppl like Samsung, Toshiba, Sony and Canon (among others) are all sensor manufacturers.This post has been edited by ac98: Apr 19 2007, 09:01 AM |
|
|
Apr 19 2007, 08:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,711 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
haha... sorry about that...
been to too many posts regarding this with too many different views and information (questionable information like what i posted previously) Ok, will not comment further on this post... lala... (but anyway i last heard alot of R&D is going into CCD? oh well, nvmind... i'm really not too bothered anyway) |
|
|
Apr 20 2007, 05:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
i thought issue like this is more or less prohibited?
hehehee! it's like nikon vs canon... indirectly |
|
|
Apr 20 2007, 05:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,758 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Selayang |
Nope, far from it. Canon uses CCD for their compact digicams, CMOS sensors from the EOS 300D onwards. Nikon uses CCDs for all their compact digicams and DLSRs except the top pro models which uses LBCAST sensors.
So ... there is no cold war here, only ill-informed members come lit fire to an otherwised very knowledgeable topic |
|
|
Apr 20 2007, 06:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,544 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong/Singapore |
To quote Mao: If a cat can catch a mouse, does it matter if it is a black cat or white cat?
|
| Change to: | 0.0170sec
0.64
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 02:17 AM |