Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Which is better, CMOS vs CCD

views
     
TSTeraPox
post Apr 8 2007, 04:07 PM, updated 19y ago

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
961 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


Actualy which Sensor is better? CMOS or CCD?
lvyk
post Apr 11 2007, 12:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
144 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Wangsa Maju x Labuan



I would say this is quite hard to compare...
Maybe you can go wikipedia or google to find out...

Anyway sensor would not be only the reason to choose a camera...
scotty
post Apr 11 2007, 01:13 AM

THX Certified Conman
Group Icon
Staff
4,380 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: petaling jaya,puchong jaya,pandan jaya,putra jaya



neither of both up there. i would say a 35mm film will be better. biggrin.gif
scorgio
post Apr 11 2007, 01:52 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,695 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


doesn't matter.
as long as it serves the purpose.
ac98
post Apr 13 2007, 04:44 PM

The Spirit of Photography
*******
Senior Member
3,758 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Selayang


Film better ... always better, haha! rclxm9.gif
mindkiller6610
post Apr 13 2007, 09:36 PM

IT-Motion : Your Digital Solutions
*******
Senior Member
2,477 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


last time they say CCD is better...

now they say CMOS technology changed and improved..it is better that CCD rclxub.gif..

confused by marketing tactics..

i rather compare other features though..

This post has been edited by mindkiller6610: Apr 13 2007, 09:37 PM
ac98
post Apr 14 2007, 02:49 AM

The Spirit of Photography
*******
Senior Member
3,758 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Selayang


Why confused? Technology always improve, last time carburator, now fuel-injection, last time CCD now CMOS ... what is so difficult to understand?

If you say why they didn't phase out carburator cars and replace all new cars with fuel-injection ones are beyond me, manufacturers have their own reasons. CCD technology also same.
wlcling
post Apr 14 2007, 01:24 PM

Hippidy Hoppidy
*******
Senior Member
2,711 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


CMOS takes up less power and noise i think is better as a result of that...

But CCD is an emerging technology, so its really hard to say which is better.

The only confusion that it feels that CMOS is lousier is bcos somehow factories create cheap CMOS sets for items such as webcams (lower quality stuff), so you generally associate CMOS sensors with these items... (cameras from China or something like that)

But of course, some Canon gurus here will beg to differ... rclxms.gif
adrianzz
post Apr 14 2007, 10:47 PM

~bored~
******
Senior Member
1,324 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Earth



las time s700 using ccd sensor,the image tat capture is in good quality...
cjtune
post Apr 14 2007, 11:02 PM

Melancholic frog
*******
Senior Member
3,544 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong/Singapore


http://www.dalsa.com/markets/ccd_vs_cmos.asp


Added on April 14, 2007, 11:04 pmFor us normal consumers, it doesn't matter.
The camera manufacturer would have weighed the pros and cons already of a CCD or CMOS sensor and have tweaked it to achieve a required image quality level.
If you're in the business of making camera equipment, then maybe you should be concerned of the differences.



This post has been edited by cjtune: Apr 14 2007, 11:04 PM
miraged
post Apr 18 2007, 11:43 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
405 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


best solution is try out urself... see whether u can see the difference.
if u can't, stick with the one which they say is better (after all u can see the difference smile.gif )
scorgio
post Apr 19 2007, 12:59 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,695 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


Once I read a photography related book.
It listed the pros & cons of CCD, CMOS & even the FOVEON sensors. In a very impartial & detailed way.
But I just skimmed through very quick cos in a rush. So cannot remember much.
In short, all of them have their own shortcomings. So how the manufacturer tackle it is most important.
tishaban
post Apr 19 2007, 03:36 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,615 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
Don't forget the lens you put in front of the sensor, plus the brain that takes the picture behind the sensor. These two factors will make more of a difference than CMOS vs. CCD.

[ - i l l u s i o n s - ]
post Apr 19 2007, 06:19 AM

Photography Addict
*****
Senior Member
744 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Brisbane, Australia



I see that CCD is more noisy compared to CMOS...
maybe its the software.. hmm
kev da man
post Apr 19 2007, 06:24 AM

super lurker
********
All Stars
15,278 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


not really, most lauyah CMOS sensors noiser than CCDs, if you wanna play CMOS then use canon tongue.gif CCD for the rest of the field. then again, canon's compact point and shoots use CCDs so go figure.
ac98
post Apr 19 2007, 09:01 AM

The Spirit of Photography
*******
Senior Member
3,758 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Selayang


QUOTE(wlcling @ Apr 14 2007, 01:24 PM)
But CCD is an emerging technology, so its really hard to say which is better.
Mmm ... I am not any Canon guru but I feel that you're very ill-informed here. The CCD and CMOS technology are invented back in the 1960s, so neither of them are 'emerging technologies'.

QUOTE(wlcling @ Apr 14 2007, 01:24 PM)
The only confusion that it feels that CMOS is lousier is bcos somehow factories create cheap CMOS sets for items such as webcams (lower quality stuff), so you generally associate CMOS sensors with these items... (cameras from China or something like that)
Factories did not CREATE cheap CMOS for China-made cameras. China bulk purchased the sensors and incorporate them into their products, it's a huge difference. Ppl like Samsung, Toshiba, Sony and Canon (among others) are all sensor manufacturers.

This post has been edited by ac98: Apr 19 2007, 09:01 AM
wlcling
post Apr 19 2007, 08:45 PM

Hippidy Hoppidy
*******
Senior Member
2,711 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


haha... sorry about that...

been to too many posts regarding this with too many different views and information (questionable information like what i posted previously)

Ok, will not comment further on this post... lala... (but anyway i last heard alot of R&D is going into CCD? oh well, nvmind... i'm really not too bothered anyway)


ifer
post Apr 20 2007, 05:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,637 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


i thought issue like this is more or less prohibited?
hehehee!

it's like nikon vs canon... indirectly
ac98
post Apr 20 2007, 05:46 PM

The Spirit of Photography
*******
Senior Member
3,758 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Selayang


Nope, far from it. Canon uses CCD for their compact digicams, CMOS sensors from the EOS 300D onwards. Nikon uses CCDs for all their compact digicams and DLSRs except the top pro models which uses LBCAST sensors.

So ... there is no cold war here, only ill-informed members come lit fire to an otherwised very knowledgeable topic wink.gif
cjtune
post Apr 20 2007, 06:19 PM

Melancholic frog
*******
Senior Member
3,544 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong/Singapore


To quote Mao: If a cat can catch a mouse, does it matter if it is a black cat or white cat?


2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0198sec    0.68    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 01:52 AM