Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Review: Manfrotto Modo Tripod, Finally, my own Manfrotto

views
     
TSjohnliew
post Apr 8 2007, 02:13 AM, updated 19y ago

Casual
***
Junior Member
339 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Kepong, Malaysia


I have always wanted a Manfrotto tripod ever since one of my friend lent me hers for a photoshoot in Pulau Redang (another story someday), which we used it for a evening shot of the beach facing the resort. Anyway, that was many years ago using film.

As some of you would know, I have recently bought a Panasonic LX2 (Official Product PageOfficial Product Page , Steve's Review), and have been aching to get a tripod, due to the less than desirable low light performance of the Venus Engine III.

So, when I heard that there was a warehouse sales by Miami photo, my quickly grabbed my brother and cousin (all photophiles) and there we go!

Low and behold, Manfrotto equipment on sale! Since I wanted an entry level tripod (waiting to get my D200, then I'll get all the heavy-duty equipment!), I was contemplating between a Modo Tripod and 718B, which are both entry level all-in-one tripods (no head change).

But when you put both together side by side, the 718B literally dwarves the Modo. And it weights a hefty 750gm (compared to Modo=1kg) more, then it's about a a palm's width longer or so. Not to mention how fat it was. Some of you might argue that the heavier tripod, the better. Which I agree, if I had my D200 smile.gif But for this case, I am going to use my LX2, which weighs only 217 gm (0.48 lb) (with Battery and SD Memory Card)!

So, Modo it is.

(56kbps Warning!)

Actually the Modo stands pretty tall when fully extended (150cm). I kind of have to agree that it is a bit shaky when fully extended, including the center column, but then again, you should not need to fully extend the center column for most shooting situations. The legs alone are tall enough for a well composed group photo.

user posted image
Standing Tall


The most outstanding feature of the Modo is the new level operated, Video/Photo dual mode ball head. What this means is that with a twist of a knob, the ball head will either go full tilt in any angle (Photo), or move vertically and horizontally along the X-Y axis only (Video), which incidentally is great for taking panning photo shots.

user posted image
Quick twist mode changer

The quick release has a non-standard shaped quick release plate, which I wonder whether I can buy a replacement if I accidently lose mine. It does not have the key ring around the knob/screw (which I liked in my friends's Manfrotto), although there is a plastic screw tool which is attached at the base of the center column. That can be used for screwing in the plate on the camera.

user posted image
Front View, with logo

Another unique feature that I really like is that the Modo supports going down really low for object/macro shots on the flow. This can be done with a simple twist of a small plate on the tripod, and has a satisfying "click!" when it is in place. But you must remember to keep the legs straight when doing this.

user posted image
Just twist the grey plate and get (the tripod) down!

For all hardcore photophiles, I have to put a big disclaimer here. The legs are pretty thin when fully extended. Although it is rated to carry a load of approximately 1kg, the whole setup is a little bit flimsy at it is (with my LX2), therefore I cannot recommend it to anyone with a DSLR, (maybe the just the D40 kit, due to it's lightweightness). For compact camara users like me, I think this is a great tripod for the following reasons: 1. It's so easy to carry, you can stuff it in any messenger bag or even a small sling bag, and you will not feel the weight. 2. The unique ball head is so easy to use, and even at the unlocked position, it was able to hang on to my desired angle without locking the head. 3. The legs feels like it can take a bit of punishment, and the metal legs has a very good build quality to them.

user posted image
Signature Manfrotto Insignia

user posted image
Look how tiny it is! (the tripod la, not my hands)

Speaking about quality, although the leg quality feels great, I can't say about the plastic parts. It's just not as polished as I like. Some of the molded plastic, like the ball handle, does not quite align 100% between the left and right parts. Even for the grey twist plate, there were already scratches when it came. But I guess those are more cosmetic problems than functional ones. Not to forget, there is a build in spirit level also, but I don't think it's mush use to me, since I am more free-willed when taking pictures smile.gif Finally, if you position the head correctly, you can carry it like a BFG2000 smile.gif

user posted image
Don't make my day!

This post has been edited by johnliew: Apr 8 2007, 02:14 AM
fan_cheong
post Apr 8 2007, 07:38 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
147 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


Thanks for the review. If could include the price and where to get it would be good.
greyPJ
post Apr 8 2007, 10:34 AM

artificially stupid
*******
Senior Member
3,169 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
you buy such a big tripod for you mini camera?
after you carry it for sometime,, you will get bored and tired and eventually leave it at home collecting dust.
Vodoo2k
post Apr 8 2007, 11:50 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,365 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Hi John,

Nice buy man.. actually, i bought this one before changing to a more sturdy manfrotto tripod. This modo got a max load of 1kg whilst all my gear weights close to 2kg hehehehe.. Anyways i love the gripper heheheh.. superb. I wished that my new tripod got the same system but unfortunately its the conventional one hehehehe.... Anyways mind to share the price?

user posted image
AlamakLor
post Apr 8 2007, 11:56 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
9,856 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur, WP


I wouldnt say the tripod is huge. Good tripod can last a lifetime, I'd personally invest in a more solid tripod. But compact tripod comes in handy once in awhile when you dont wanna lug a hefty tripod out.
exkay
post Apr 8 2007, 12:06 PM

Hired Gunman
*******
Senior Member
3,657 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: My Room



QUOTE(greyPJ @ Apr 8 2007, 10:34 AM)
you buy such a big tripod for you mini camera?
after you carry it for sometime,, you will get bored and tired and eventually leave it at home collecting dust.
*
he who actually bought a manfrotto, will never leave home without his manfrotto.

guess you've not bitten by the manfrotto bug yet ehs ?

MODO should be around RM 290, before discount. I kinda like it due to it's small size but, hate the thin legs once it's fully extended.

but hey, i've already have my 190CLB + 141RC, the only reason why would i need a smaller one is because my mom needs one for her trips, ( 190CLB's 3KG weight seems to be too heavy for her ).
TSjohnliew
post Apr 9 2007, 01:21 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
339 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Kepong, Malaysia


Yeah, the reason I got the Modo is because of the weight (or the lack of it smile.gif ).

I got it from the Photo Miami warehouse sales last week at Jalan Tandang, PJ, and a steal @ RM260.


Added on April 9, 2007, 1:25 pmActually I always wanted a Manfrotto Monopod as well, but the reason I shy away is:

1. Although there is an adapter to change the Monopod to a ad-hoc tripod, but the "stand" costs RM150.

2. I can't do angled shots with an Monopod (I mean like 90 degree shots...)

3. It does not come with a quick release (another RM150)...

So, RM150 (Monopod) + RM150 (Quick release) + RM150 (Stand) + RM150 (Ball head) = RM600... shocking.gif

This post has been edited by johnliew: Apr 9 2007, 01:25 PM
AlamakLor
post Apr 9 2007, 01:39 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
9,856 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur, WP


Monopod is no substitute for tripod for even with the add-on legs, so if you didn't have a tripod at the first place, getting a tripod first is anytime a better choice than getting a monopod. My 680 + 322rc2 already cost 550RM sweat.gif and btw, you don't need quick release if you plan to use a head with the monopod tongue.gif unless the head you are getting doesnt come with a quick release....
TSjohnliew
post Apr 9 2007, 01:54 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
339 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Kepong, Malaysia


QUOTE(Vodoo2k @ Apr 8 2007, 11:50 AM)
Hi John,

Nice buy man.. actually, i bought this one before changing to a more sturdy manfrotto tripod. This modo got a max load of 1kg whilst all my gear weights close to 2kg hehehehe.. Anyways i love the gripper heheheh.. superb. I wished that my new tripod got the same system but unfortunately its the conventional one hehehehe.... Anyways mind to share the price?

*
Is that the 718B?


Added on April 9, 2007, 1:56 pm
QUOTE(AlamakLor @ Apr 9 2007, 01:39 PM)
Monopod is no substitute for tripod for even with the add-on legs, so if you didn't have a tripod at the first place, getting a tripod first is anytime a better choice than getting a monopod.  My 680 + 322rc2 already cost 550RM sweat.gif and btw, you don't need quick release if you plan to use a head with the monopod tongue.gif unless the head you are getting doesnt come with a quick release....
*
The cheapest Manfrotto ball head does not have a quick release smile.gif

This post has been edited by johnliew: Apr 9 2007, 01:56 PM
clemong_888
post Apr 9 2007, 02:06 PM

どんど晴れ
*******
Senior Member
2,502 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Kuching,Kuala Lumpur, Gifu,Japan


QUOTE(AlamakLor @ Apr 9 2007, 01:39 PM)
Monopod is no substitute for tripod for even with the add-on legs, so if you didn't have a tripod at the first place, getting a tripod first is anytime a better choice than getting a monopod.  My 680 + 322rc2 already cost 550RM sweat.gif and btw, you don't need quick release if you plan to use a head with the monopod tongue.gif unless the head you are getting doesnt come with a quick release....
*
how much did you buy your 322?
AlamakLor
post Apr 9 2007, 04:54 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
9,856 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur, WP


QUOTE(johnliew @ Apr 9 2007, 02:54 AM)
The cheapest Manfrotto ball head does not have a quick release smile.gif
*
It's simple, don't buy the cheapest, but pool the money you'd spend on a release plate + cheapest head for something better. If you need to buy a quick release plate, and a ball head that doesnt have quick release....you end up having your ball head stuck on yout camera/lens even after you released it, which makes little sense to have a quick release yet a ball head stuck at the bottom of the camera/lens, obstructing normal usage. With RM300 (quick release plate, and cheap ball head) you can already get a fairly good, if not very good, head with quick release.

QUOTE(clemong_888 @ Apr 9 2007, 03:06 AM)
how much did you buy your 322?
*
I bought my 322 for 110usd shipped....it was actually 100usd..+ $10 shipping....a little over RM300. This sucker is so convenient and robust, it's gonna last me a very very long time. My philosophy in buying things is go for the optimum thing that you can get out of your $$, it doesn't need to be the best (and best in photography, espeically lens, is subjective and subtle with the pro leses, but the price is VAST!), but you sure as hell don't wanna get the cheapest/worst. If you can't afford the optimum stuff, don't buy it...save up, and come back later. I always try to get the most juice out of my money icon_rolleyes.gif
TSjohnliew
post Apr 10 2007, 12:07 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
339 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Kepong, Malaysia


QUOTE(AlamakLor @ Apr 9 2007, 04:54 PM)
It's simple, don't buy the cheapest, but pool the money you'd spend on a release plate + cheapest head for something better. If you need to buy a quick release plate, and a ball head that doesnt have quick release....you end up having your ball head stuck on yout camera/lens even after you released it, which makes little sense to have a quick release yet a ball head stuck at the bottom of the camera/lens, obstructing normal usage. With RM300 (quick release plate, and cheap ball head) you can already get a fairly good, if not very good, head with quick release.
I bought my 322 for 110usd shipped....it was actually 100usd..+ $10 shipping....a little over RM300. This sucker is so convenient and robust, it's gonna last me a very very long time. My philosophy in buying things is go for the optimum thing that you can get out of your $$, it doesn't need to be the best (and best in photography, espeically lens, is subjective and subtle with the pro leses, but the price is VAST!), but you sure as hell don't wanna get the cheapest/worst. If you can't afford the optimum stuff, don't buy it...save up, and come back later. I always try to get the most juice out of my money  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
The master has spoken smile.gif notworthy.gif

But I guess Manfrotto is cheaper there... Gitzo too.
exkay
post Apr 10 2007, 12:10 PM

Hired Gunman
*******
Senior Member
3,657 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: My Room



i use to pay my 190CLB + 141RC for like RM 520 and that was consider cheap that time.
AlamakLor
post Apr 10 2007, 01:36 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
9,856 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur, WP


Master in spending....maybe tongue.gif I buy most of my stuff from the states and have them shipped over here by my friend. If i had to buy it from Canada...it will cost alot more than what you guys pay in Msia.
romen
post Apr 11 2007, 03:29 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,278 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


ahh, the same model exkay tried poisoning me with

gotta wait till my cheapo rm38 tripod snaps in half first tongue.gif

btw, i think my tripod stands around 150cm too, lolz
TSjohnliew
post Apr 12 2007, 10:34 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
339 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Kepong, Malaysia


QUOTE(romen @ Apr 11 2007, 03:29 PM)
ahh, the same model exkay tried poisoning me with

gotta wait till my cheapo rm38 tripod snaps in half first tongue.gif

btw, i think my tripod stands around 150cm too, lolz
*
Haha.... I am not reviewing it to poison ppl ler. It's for the benefit of those who don't have any tripod yet, or ppl who are suffering from "tripod abandonment syndrome" because of the size and weight smile.gif
ifer
post Apr 12 2007, 01:32 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,637 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


didnt know manfrotto are coming out with lower end models now.
looks cute though this modo...
tripod's prices are getting crazier now.
i bought my 055B + 141RC + bag for rm 450 last time
fecgoh
post Apr 13 2007, 09:17 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
64 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Kelana Jaya, Petaling Jaya


After I read the review here, I got myself the MODO at Ampang Park. RM230. No more bending over when I wanna look at my viewfinder! Very happy owner. Thanks for the review!
TSjohnliew
post Apr 13 2007, 11:30 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
339 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Kepong, Malaysia


QUOTE(fecgoh @ Apr 13 2007, 09:17 AM)
After I read the review here, I got myself the MODO at Ampang Park. RM230. No more bending over when I wanna look at my viewfinder! Very happy owner. Thanks for the review!
*
Glad to be of service. Hope you enjoy the Modo as much as I do! (when I get my LX-2 back from my fren, that is. tongue.gif)
fecgoh
post Apr 14 2007, 10:32 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
64 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Kelana Jaya, Petaling Jaya


Since it is all black, it goes with my fz7. And when you carry it around, people will like "hayo! fierce lah that thing". I love it! Infact it look better than my FZ7!

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0177sec    0.47    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 01:13 AM