Oct 3 2017, 08:55 AM
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Oct 2 2017, 09:58 PM)
Interesting video from Mindblank again.
He sure has a very good RAM kit coupled with a strong IMC in the CPU.
But one thing he lacks is that stress test has not been done to confirm its stability.
3466 C14 is not easy with my current hardware. It can run stably in one test but failed in another test, not 100% stable.
Suspect is weak IMC seeing at the high SOC that my CPU required.
I'm running that 3466 Vengeance RGB kit rock-stable for a month now at CL16-18-18-36-55 (exactly as per the XMP/DOHP). DOHP profile 3466 doesn't work, I had to put timings and a bunch of sub-timings (tRRD_S, tRRD-L, tRFC1, tRFC2, tRFC4, tFAW, tCCD-L) manually, give it 1.4v, vboot also 1.4v, vsoc 1.1. Now after watching Mindblank's video, I'm very enticed to try CL14. You shared your CL14 timings with that 3466 kit before right? I'll try to replicate it and see if I get more stable result with my 1700's IMC.He sure has a very good RAM kit coupled with a strong IMC in the CPU.
But one thing he lacks is that stress test has not been done to confirm its stability.
3466 C14 is not easy with my current hardware. It can run stably in one test but failed in another test, not 100% stable.
Suspect is weak IMC seeing at the high SOC that my CPU required.
This post has been edited by raydenex: Oct 3 2017, 08:57 AM
Quote
0.0242sec
0.80
7 queries
GZIP Disabled