So next time if your daugther or wife tak mabuk but kena rape, then its ok?

Otak dalam lutut

Your example is stupid and explains clearly why your logic is in your lutut at the first place. You masuk kandang you already expected to kena baham if not careful.
She didnt went out with that guy with expectations for 3 other people will rape her.

Victim blaming. For all you know, if she isn't mabuk and fought back, they will still rape her anyway (already kena target before mabuk) but will also hurt/murder her for fighting back.

Again failed logic.
Based on that logic, people with your mentality should be prosecuted in advance to reduce the risk of any rape happening at all.
Remove all the people who has this mentality from the streets, cause they think its less wrong for the woman to be raped if she is drunk. If whole society thinks rape is absolutely wrong to the highest degree, we'll have a free rape society. So lets get rid of anyone who thinks any less.


Does that make sense to you?

Another stupid logic. /k/ is full of stupid people
Your analogy is so wrong


You drunk and drive and hit people = You mabuk and have sex and rape people
--> Drinking and driving is wrong, rape people whether mabuk or not also is wrong

You mabuk and get raped = You mabuk while stading tepi jalan and kena langgar by non mabuk people
--> This case, rapist is wrong, and non mabuk driver langgar you is wrong
--> Mabuk is not an offense, standing tepi jalan while mabuk not an offense


No wonder so many rapist in this world. All stem from logic bodo

Great, you passed judgement on her after assuming that she should know he has friends like that. How did you know she was aware he has friends like that? She told you? You're a friend?

Next time a 'gentleman' colleague of your wife raped her or 'saint' best friend cheated you in a business partnership, remember your words and blame yourself too for being stupid.

”Having consented to having sexual intercourse with one individual, she was then raped by three other men,” Deputy Public Prosector G. Kannan told the Singapore High Court.

”Intoxicated and asleep, she was unaware of what was going on around her. She was taken advantage of and raped in quick succession by the three.”

Where was it said that she consented to having sex with 4 people? It was only mentioned that she consented to having sex with 1 person.
Of course its her words against theirs, and a possible defense for the 3 guys is to say that she consented. We wont know unless we attend the hearing. But if we are arguing based on this article, then the consent was given only to 1 person. And the issue isn't that person raping her, its the other 3.

For all you know, the other 3 could've gotten consent from that 1 guy, which that 1 guy was not in position to give consent.
Or, that 1 guy could've passed out also, and the 3 guys raped her without that 1 guys' knowledge
Or that 1 guy was forced by those 3 guys to just accept

In any case, for that 1 guy to abscond and run away makes me opine that he isn't innocent.

What your house wife does doesn't matter. It was not meant to be personal. That was merely an analogy to reflect your logic, which is flawed.
You assumed that the victim could've made a judgement call on whether the other 3 friends are of good character, when the article itself didn't mention how she met them.
The article only mentioned she knew 1 of the guy. And that 1 guy could be of good character. So your argument and logic is wrong.

I'm not dealing with the issue of her being gang raped. I'm just dealing with victim blamers such as yourself that perpetuates rape culture in this society which indirectly empower others that are more bold to commit such an atrocity.