If you didn't lock the door and thief broke into your house, both you and the thief are to be blamed. If you lock the door but the thief still broke in, only the thief is to be blamed.
MALAYSIAN AMOI GANGBANGED by "ANGMOH"
MALAYSIAN AMOI GANGBANGED by "ANGMOH"
|
|
Aug 2 2017, 10:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
550 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
If you didn't lock the door and thief broke into your house, both you and the thief are to be blamed. If you lock the door but the thief still broke in, only the thief is to be blamed.
|
|
|
Aug 2 2017, 10:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
550 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
QUOTE(desmond2020 @ Aug 2 2017, 10:46 AM) If you flaunt the beg, both you and the rempit are to be blamed. If you held the beg tightly, but the rempit went and pukul you before taking your beg, then the thief is to be blamed. You read what I write properly or not? |
|
|
Aug 2 2017, 10:52 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
550 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
|
|
|
Aug 2 2017, 10:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
550 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
QUOTE(Kim Bi Jan @ Aug 2 2017, 10:52 AM) i dunno wat logic is this coz my cousin in US usually dont lock door.... Because in your cousin area (and maybe in some countries like Japan), the risk for break-ins are much-much lower. You think everywhere is USA or Japan?so long its not ur property, ur not suppose to be there in the 1st place unless u have a valid reason.... |
|
|
Aug 2 2017, 10:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
550 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
|
|
|
Aug 2 2017, 11:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
550 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
QUOTE(Kim Bi Jan @ Aug 2 2017, 10:55 AM) i think ppl should not take what is not theirs Of course that's what almost everyone was taught, that ppl should not take what is not theirs. But it's very naive to think that everyone who was taught that will always follow it. You can say if everyone is well-educated, maybe risk for crime like this will be smaller. But that time haven't come yet, so in the mean time you have to do what you can to minimize the risk on yourself.simple as that u got go gunpla competition or not? those display can take home even not urs? |
|
|
Aug 2 2017, 11:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
550 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
QUOTE(Kim Bi Jan @ Aug 2 2017, 11:02 AM) but if we dont lead by example..and give percception that it is OK to take other people's RX-78 build simply coz we like and saw it being display in a BAKUT competition, then other's who thought it is NOT OK, might be swayed as well. Yes must start with yourselves. But I tell you this, if I don't steal, it does not mean everyone else will not steal too. That does not mean stealing is permitted. You want to lead, but not everyone will follow your lead. dont u think everything good should be start from our own selves? in setting up a good example? granted we cant make them follow us...but there's no reason to encourage bad behaviour as well no? I don't encourage the bad behavior. What I'm encouraging is, being wise. During BAKUT competition, did the organizer put some staff to monitor the event? That's what we called minimizing risk. Going by your logic, putting the staff there means stealing the model kits was encouraged. Well, of course no, it's to discourage people from doing that instead. |
|
|
Aug 2 2017, 01:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
550 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
QUOTE(Kim Bi Jan @ Aug 2 2017, 12:06 PM) i agree I never ever justify what the rapists did. It's just pointed some people are very naive about the world. Minimizing risk is actually a very sound advice.that s why we say we are all bound by the law of the country we are living in and if it is wrong, no point trying to justify it - especially when it is wrong both morally and legally. ur saying did not the gahment put police on the streets to monitor also? |
|
|
Aug 2 2017, 03:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
550 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
QUOTE(Kim Bi Jan @ Aug 2 2017, 02:55 PM) u call it naive Kind-hearted can be naive, if you want to know.i call them kind hearted i know ppl around me who try to see the good in people, than shun them upon meeting them like when random ppl approach them for help, they really help genuinely thinking they needed help. it's not their fault when ppl use humanism to betray those trust rather, i condemn those who abuse the trust..than say, pandan la..u need to share 30% fault also for helping out someone who MIGHT be in need. |
|
|
Aug 2 2017, 03:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
550 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
|
|
|
Aug 2 2017, 03:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
550 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
QUOTE(Kim Bi Jan @ Aug 2 2017, 03:39 PM) i thought we're going with onoly 2 options? You can be kind-hearted, but of course not until you let people trampled over you (this is part where I said not everyone will be kind to you). Minimizing risk does not mean you should be cruel.of course if there is a perfect world i would have chosen that..but its you who says man are flawed by saying that u can be good, but not everyone will. now u u-turn and use my point tembak me pulak |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0220sec
0.44
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 09:41 PM |