Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Regarding 2018 new tinting rule - MS2669, QR code

views
     
mushigen
post Aug 1 2017, 08:45 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,954 posts

Joined: Jul 2010


QUOTE(coolstore @ Jul 31 2017, 10:58 PM)
news today

https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2017/07/...hicle-tint-film

Question:

The QR code which doing certification job - is it certify the nature of the film VLT or ceritfy the VLT after the film tinted on windscreen? it is 2 difference thing even a VLT 70% film stick to an UV windscreen make it less than 70% already

by that news contents, it looks like it certify the film specification, not the aftermath result (whereby all tinted car would fail puspakom test VLT70)

so with this QR code (the tint film is VLT 70 compliance, but after tinted the windscreen actually below VLT70) can pass on any puspakom and jpj blocking test already?

*
I had the same thought the moment I read the article. Also, is the QR code printed randomly on the tint film, or is it just a sticker? If sticker, you and I know what follows next.
mushigen
post Aug 2 2017, 03:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,954 posts

Joined: Jul 2010


QUOTE(scorgio @ Aug 1 2017, 10:31 PM)
There's never any JPJ-compliance film.

Many people don't realize the VLT of the ori windscreen of a new car now is already at 80%. If u put on anything less than 90% VLT, confirm fail. BUT tint film of 90% VLT with sufficient IR UV rejection is rather expensive, making it unmarketable. Of course accessories shop won't tell you this.

Ended up now, every vehicle going for a B5 B7 check at Puspakom must remove the film in order to pass.
*
Not true. It's a matter of whether the suppliers want to bring them in or not.

In Singapore, the minimum permissible VLT levels are: 70% for front windscreen and both front windows, and 25% for rear windows and rear windscreen.
(Sos )
The minimum VLT allowed for rear windows/windscreen was even higher before it was brought down to 25%. Even then, cars with tinted windows/windscreen had no problem passing their mandatory vehicle inspection.
FYI, in Singapore, news cars need to be inspected after 3 years, 5 years, 7 years, 9 years, followed by yearly if they are used beyond ten years.

Reason for posting this? There are films manufactured to meet the regulations by big names like 3M, VKool, and whatever.
mushigen
post Aug 2 2017, 10:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,954 posts

Joined: Jul 2010


QUOTE(scorgio @ Aug 2 2017, 09:54 PM)
Please look at my explanation below:

[attachmentid=9012776]
The above is the B5 inspection report for one of my cars. The VLT reading of 74% 70% 72% 72% are all on ori glass, WITHOUT any TINTED FILM. If I put on a 80% VLT film from 3M (based on ur terminology, this is JPJ-compliant), mathematically the front windscreen VLT would be lowered to 74%x0.8=59%, ie. it will fail the VLT test.

[attachmentid=9012779]
This is the B5 report of my other car, done January 2017. The VLT reading: front 75%, back 65%, front right & left 64%, again these are all WITHOUT any TINTED FILM. Because I removed them after they failed the 1st time. While the rear left & right's 42% had film on (70% VLT type).
*
This, I can agree. Conti cars, especially, tend to have tinted glass. However, it does not apply to all cars, and this means there are films that can be used legally on other cars.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0168sec    0.50    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 08:40 AM