Penryn and Nehalem details, 45nm intel chips
|
|
 Mar 29 2007, 06:47 AM, updated 19y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
10,544 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: GMT +8:00  
|
A few more details...
http://www.techreport.com/onearticle.x/12127 http://www.techreport.com/onearticle.x/12130 http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel...doc.aspx?i=2955 http://realworldtech.com/page.cfm?NewsID=3...=03-28-2007#369 Looks like K8L will have quite a bit of competition. This post has been edited by ikanayam: Mar 29 2007, 07:12 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 29 2007, 07:04 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
Senior Member
808 posts Joined: Jan 2007
|
going to post the same topic, but u were faster
 . anyway, the 1st thing came into my mind when i saw the details of nahelem, OMG, wtf..., what will AMD do? even if K10(previously known as K8L) did surpass C2D as AMD claimed, it wont last long(a year?), Penryn may or may not perform better than K10, but we can assure that Nahelem will gv AMD a serious headache. look at this.this will gv a better picture. *Intel seems to introduce new architecture every 2 years, hmm.....while AMD release their new architecture in 3-4 years. |
|
|
Mar 29 2007, 07:15 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
10,544 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: GMT +8:00
|
AMD also releases more incremental architectural mini updates than intel however.
|
|
|
Mar 29 2007, 07:25 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
808 posts Joined: Jan 2007
|
1 good thing about this stiff competition is, "we will get super cheap multicore cpu
 ". if not because of Core, we wouldnt get AMD3600 X2 at RM265 (and it's going to get cheaper next month  ).This post has been edited by edwin3210: Mar 29 2007, 07:25 AM |
|
|
Mar 29 2007, 10:32 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
Senior Member
1,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: No longer hanging by a NUS 
|
QUOTE(edwin3210 @ Mar 29 2007, 07:25 AM) 1 good thing about this stiff competition is, "we will get super cheap multicore cpu Cheap but ultra-thin margins won't keep any company in business for long. ". if not because of Core, we wouldnt get AMD3600 X2 at RM265 (and it's going to get cheaper next month ). |
|
|
Mar 29 2007, 11:00 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#6
|
|
Junior Member
188 posts Joined: May 2006
|
But if K10 can't compete, AMD will die then no more competition. Prices will go sky high again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 29 2007, 02:28 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE Nehalem will no longer use a FSB but a serial point to point interconnect. Even more revolutionary is the fact that Nehalem will have an integrated memory controller (IMC) and that the number of serial interconnects is variable (Intel's version of "HyperTransport"). Another potentially groundbreaking move is that some Nehalem CPUs will have a GPU integrated (Intel's version of "Fusion"). With an integrated memory controller, new interconnect, and potentially integrated graphics, Nehalem will obviously require a new socket. This is cool,new core will be having integrated memory controller. This means the new mobos will not be having the northbirdge controller in the mobo already like AMD one ? |
|
|
Mar 29 2007, 04:21 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#8
|
|
Junior Member
67 posts Joined: Feb 2005
|
Why intel want to turn into FSB1600 so fast? The FSB1333 processor not release to the market yet!
|
|
|
Mar 29 2007, 05:16 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
Senior Member
1,496 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: Baling, Kedah  
|
1600FSB, SSE4, low power consume, high performance, it great or intel, proud being intel user... hehe
|
|
|
Mar 29 2007, 06:20 PM
|
|
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
This is what we called "Technology grows".1600FSB providing higher bandwidth than 1333FSB,that means more instructions can be send at the same time.
|
|
|
Mar 29 2007, 08:09 PM
|
Senior Member
1,175 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Borneo Island
|
what bout the price???for sure it will be pricey...
|
|
|
Mar 29 2007, 09:52 PM
|
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Mar 2006
|
QUOTE(apis @ Mar 29 2007, 08:09 PM) what bout the price???for sure it will be pricey... New hw when 1st start to come out of course sure pricey la.Just take a look at 76GT's nowadays. |
|
|
Mar 30 2007, 07:58 AM
|
|
Validating
140 posts Joined: Dec 2005 From: R&D Center & Home
|
QUOTE(ikanayam @ Mar 29 2007, 07:47 AM) A few more details... Big competition in fact. *Rumours* said, 10% - 40% performance advantage over K8L. http://www.techreport.com/onearticle.x/12127 http://www.techreport.com/onearticle.x/12130 http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel...doc.aspx?i=2955 http://realworldtech.com/page.cfm?NewsID=3...=03-28-2007#369 Looks like K8L will have quite a bit of competition.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 30 2007, 08:32 AM
|
Senior Member
2,603 posts Joined: Sep 2006
|
QUOTE(raymond5105 @ Mar 29 2007, 02:28 PM) This is cool,new core will be having integrated memory controller. This means the new mobos will not be having the northbirdge controller in the mobo already like AMD one ? northbirdge or southbridge memory controller  & have u look at AMD's chipset  even though their processor already embedded the memory controller, but their own chipset still got north & south bridge  wonder why??  |
|
|
Mar 30 2007, 10:39 AM
|
|
Senior Member
808 posts Joined: Jan 2007
|
QUOTE(E-J@1 @ Mar 30 2007, 08:32 AM) northbirdge or southbridge memory controller & have u look at AMD's chipset even though their processor already embedded the memory controller, but their own chipset still got north & south bridge wonder why?? which generation of AMD processor u mean? |
|
|
Mar 30 2007, 01:56 PM
|
|
Senior Member
10,544 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: GMT +8:00
|
QUOTE(E-J@1 @ Mar 29 2007, 07:32 PM) northbirdge or southbridge memory controller The nb didn't just have the memory controller. Most high bandwidth I/O like the AGP/PCI/PCI-E interface are handled by the nb. & have u look at AMD's chipset even though their processor already embedded the memory controller, but their own chipset still got north & south bridge wonder why?? |
|
|
Mar 30 2007, 02:11 PM
|
 
Elite
5,784 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Shah Alam
|
Btw, the Penryn is a LGA479, and Nehalem is a LGA950
|
|
|
Mar 30 2007, 02:22 PM
|
 
Moderator
9,277 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: KL. Best place in Malaysia. Nuff said
|
LGA 479? So that mean it smaller than the current LGA775?
|
|
|
Mar 30 2007, 02:32 PM
|
|
Elite
5,784 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Shah Alam
|
QUOTE(linkinstreet @ Mar 30 2007, 02:22 PM) LGA 479? So that mean it smaller than the current LGA775? It's SQ35mm, that's all for now. I cant disclose more  |
|
|
Mar 30 2007, 02:42 PM
|
|
Senior Member
10,544 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: GMT +8:00
|
QUOTE(kucingfight @ Mar 30 2007, 01:11 AM) Btw, the Penryn is a LGA479, and Nehalem is a LGA950 hm... less pins? Sounds a little weird to me. 479 sounds very familiar, maybe that is the mobile version? |
| Change to: |  0.0162sec
 0.83
 5 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 04:37 PM |
Quote