For 2K resolution, minimum R9 390X / GTX 970

can u share your desktop screen bro?

print screen quality pun enough dy... tq.

This is Print Screen X Ligthshot.

Hope this help.

Note: It might looks a bit blurry here due to quality being compressed . but in reality, it's very sharp. Like in my 25" HP Pavilion LED Monitor ( 1920 x 1080p ). It's just that the screen is bigger .

This post has been edited by StuartLee2015: Jul 20 2017, 11:33 PM


Attached thumbnail(s)

Hmmm... did you both know screenshot tell nothing? Nor matter what size your monitor are, the output is same on screenshot.

this is 1080p?


yes.

i just need to see the icon size and titles...

Oh. Interesting to see 1440p? Haha!

Although it's 1080p on 27", it's actually nice. Everything is sharp.

the difference in 1440p and 1080p on the same size like the Ultrasharp 27, it will be lots more space , icons looks smaller, everything will be very big.

Like 1080p on a 17'' laptop of my friend. it's a Dell XPS. the model i forgotten. The text looks super tiny.

Interesting to see what owner claimed those sharpness using 1080p on 27"....

My laptop is 15.6" and running 1080p. it just slightly small but still ok to me and still better resolution than 720p which is obvious pixelate.
Also working space for 720p is too narrow already. No choice they is no 1050p (16:10 ratio) resolution for laptop. I don't pick 900p also as that is also narrow working space.

Maybe you prefer big icon and big font size, that why you said 1080p just nice in 27".

For me, I prefer below resolution

20" - 1050p (16:10 ratio)
22" to 24" - 1080p or 1200p (16:10 ratio)
27" to 32" - 1440p

For new ultra wide monitor, I need minimum 34" and 1440p. I seen before 29" which now look small to me and most 29" is only 1080p which no longer my preferable working space resolution.

No screen is run nice in Windows 100% scale for 2160p because it still look too tiny even in 50" (I seen my friend using 50" 4K TV before).

2160p must run more than 100% scale and some apps still can't run proper in scaling. That is one of the reason I don't look for 2160p monitor for now unless future Windows and application solve this scale issue and also GPU need to be much much more powerful to render 2160p resolution games. Now the most high end GTX 1080 just spot nice on it. 2160p is not yet for now.


1080p definitely loose some sharpness on 27". I had check before few include Dell model and it just don't make it for me.

As for 32", beside sharpness issue, everything is way too big already in 1080p, actually in 27" already look big.

Attached here the 100% scaling by Windows 10 in 1440p vs 1080p. As you can see it is same scale size but 1440p having much better working space and it is well done in 27" and above. Everything just look perfect and not too big.



This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Jul 22 2017, 05:48 AM

Thats the interesting part..
Because from the screen shots its not that big..

Unless owner run dsr...

The screenshot by StuartLee2015 is exact 1080p.

See the image dimension. It is exactly the 1080p resolution.



What monitor you use? and what is the resolution? Wonder why you doubt StuartLee2015 screenshot or my screenshot? You can download the image and check yourself the image dimension.

If you are using 2160p (4k) resolution monitor then 1080p is very small because 1080p is some sort like 1k, 1440p is 2k, they is no 3k monitor and straight jump to 4k.

DSR? I though DSR can only apply for gaming. You can't tell from the windows OS screenshot.

The Differences of 1080p vs 1440p vs 2160p



This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Jul 22 2017, 05:28 PM

no no.. its not doubt.

just that i tot 1080p in 27 will much bigger and blurer...

but not.

thats all.

lol... but it looks fine to me, no blurry text ...

I guess it's up to personal preference. I'm using U2715H at the moment and really like the 1440p resolution. Previously was using S2715H.. I prefer 1440p if u using a 27" monitor.

As I said before you can't judge based on screenshot.

I think you still don't get it.

The screenshot is same size forever & same quality and it won't because 27" the screenshot will bigger, and 17" the screenshot will smaller or make any differences to the quality if all is same resolution.

It is same size and not follow monitor size because it is follow the size of the resolution output from the operating system.

You see exact the same size image & same quality when you screenshot from 17", 20", 27", 32" and even 100" monitor on same resolution.

You do seen different image size when you screenshot 1080p resolution gaming and 2160p gaming in DSR mode using same monitor. This is because under DSR mode, you are actually render the games virtually in 2160p resolution but later output it to your monitor native resolution for example 1080p. The image bigger because the screenshot is taken the exact resolution of 2160p not 1080p.

For output quality on same resolution but different screen size, you need to see physically to know the output.

** screenshot is taken the image of the exact output from the system itself not the physical device output. This is the same thing some user don't understand and taken phone screenshot and tell user my phone screen is damage, yellowish, tint issue, dead pixel and etc. Even your screen is broken but the screenshot still perfect. Why? Because screenshot is taken the operating system image itself not how the physical look (the thing you seen from screen). Physical look is impossible to get from screenshot. Only manage by see yourself physically or taken by using another camera.

This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Jul 22 2017, 09:54 PM

Anyone knows where I can find SAMSUNG C32HG70 monitor in Malaysia?

The best 16:9 gaming monitor available

32 Inch
QHD (2560x1440) Resolution
1MS Response Time
144Hz Freesync
QLED Screen

http://www.samsung.com/us/computing/monito...lc32hg70qqnxza/

The gaming style menu is real awesome. I agree this is the best gaming monitor. Finally it is not TN. It is VA which is still very nice view and color. This proof not only TN can get 1ms respond time. Since VA also can get 1ms. No point getting TN anymore. TN is pure rubbish to me IMO.

It is still very new, wait sometimes probably it will come.



This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Jul 23 2017, 01:57 PM

The price is a little scary though at US$699
But with that spec & Samsung name on it, it's not that surprising

Here's hoping I can get my CTO to buy this for me as a present for completing the current project I'm running right now
A year ago I got him to buy Samsung 950 Pro 512GB for my last project completion

This post has been edited by sHawTY: Jul 23 2017, 02:04 PM

Ya, the price is ... ....

RM 2.9k, lucky I not that demand yet. That price can buy 2 units of 32" WQHD ViewSonic VX3209-2K IPS panel and still left RM 300 for snack. Haha!

A bit too expensive ... but no denied from spec it is very awesome. Review very great also.

Lol, lucky you, wish you good luck fulfill your dream. Hehe

This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Jul 23 2017, 02:07 PM

I officially hate my AG322FCX now
It's flickering badly. No matter what cable I use, old or new, DP or HDMI
In fact, it's even worse when on HDMI, not only does it limit the speed to 120Hz, but the flickering is even worse when the screen just go dark

Not sure if it's my graphic card or the monitor itself, but reading on the internet, there are hundreds of people having the same issue as me

The only thing I haven't tried is using a different graphic card, but the only other graphic card I have is R7 250 which does not support FreeSync

This post has been edited by sHawTY: Jul 29 2017, 11:57 PM