Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Sigma 70-200mm vs Nikon 80-200mm, the decision is hard :(

views
     
scotty
post Mar 24 2007, 05:58 PM

THX Certified Conman
Group Icon
Staff
4,380 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: petaling jaya,puchong jaya,pandan jaya,putra jaya



QUOTE(AlamakLor @ Mar 24 2007, 02:30 PM)
Was gonna buy the tamron sp 90 next, then replace my 18-70mm with the 18-200mm VR but im wondering if I should just dump my 18-70mm now for the sigma 50-150mm f/2.8 since I've already got the tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 and the sigma can work as my macro lens temporarily. Or should I get the sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 instead of the 50-150mm? damn kau lots of choices out there  shakehead.gif but I definitely will pick up the 90mm tamron later  rclxms.gif

I'm contemplating whether the VR is needed since I've already got a monopod for the lens.
*
get the 70-200 f2.8. u wont regret doing so.
scotty
post Mar 26 2007, 11:48 PM

THX Certified Conman
Group Icon
Staff
4,380 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: petaling jaya,puchong jaya,pandan jaya,putra jaya



QUOTE(AlamakLor @ Mar 26 2007, 03:20 PM)
yeah biggrin.gif I emailed sigma about it. The old version's chip is not compatible with D200 and they offered firmware upgrade for those lenses FOC....i asked them if all the new macro version comes with latest firmware.
*
they got some bug defect on the ealier batch. what is the problem like? exif file all screwed up? focusing?

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0127sec    0.63    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 09:02 AM