You are clearly an idiot. Do you know how to read? What is your level of education?

The former Audi's crash engineer was comparing between Iriz and Bezza crash test result and he explained why and how Bezza could score high points. It was due to WEIGHT.





A short glance on Honda's website for Jazz and City reveals the weight for these two cars at only 1100 max as compared to Iriz which is 1180g, and Persona is 1210kg. This "duo" are the heaviest B-segment cars in the Malaysian market today.

In high speed collision between Iriz/Persona versus City/Jazz - the latter will suffer the most.

The models he mentioned is irrelevant, his elaboration on crash test technicalities is what matters.

The difference of weight between the Honda City and Proton Persona is glaring. More than 100 kg differences.



SOURCE:
Jazz: https://www.honda.com.my/model/specifications/jazz
City: https://www.honda.com.my/model/specifications/city
Iriz: http://www.proton-edar.com.my/en/Models/Ir...iew%20Page.aspx
Persona: http://www.newpersona.proton.com/

thread hijacked? Im here expecting to see proton, wth with all crash education vid?

My post from so long ago also want to reply lol. My how/why question earlier is rhetoric. Dun care what bs safety tech Proton is pushing but the end result still below market benchmark.

Plus, why u quote me answers comparing Iriz with Bezza? My post is clearly highlighting the Honda B-segment duo.

City










Preve






The difference between 5-Star NCAP with HPF steel versus 5-Star NCAP without it. Accident has lots of variables. A sole judgment by how good a car performs in frontal collision is a naive thought.

He should start his own thread instead of disturbing this with his spam. Hope proton can keep their safety strength under geely PRC.

But both lorries net weight and speed before impact are different.
Unless we compare both in a controlled environment, we  are just comparing orange to apple 

But both lorries net weight and speed before impact are different.
Unless we compare both in a controlled environment, we  are just comparing orange to apple 

its ok, with his level of reasoning, we can similarly conclude P1 kena bungkus/take over cos its lousy. 

Haha. Said by someone who keeps talking thrash about Proton all over Lowyat. 

Yes. I read what you've written about Proton here. I'm not "newcomer". 

Aiyoo. Give credit where credit is due lah. Isn't a person with engineering qualification at least has decent intelligence?

at the end, after all the theory on technology and business, what matters is the end result right? that P1 failed spectacularly. do you agree?

Oh dear. Oh dear.

I know where you try to drag me from here. I've seen your junk comment all over this forum. So interested in Proton, but said nothing more than a pure thrash. I'm not going to bite the bait.

I have to agree. But isn't the safety design is already there in the first place? Well, I don't think the lorry stop ramming exactly where the hot steel was by a mere chance or coincidence. 

since u just registered but seems to have been reading all the past comment, can we say you are a dupe. why use dupe?

Unker. That's how you like to address yourself izzit?

Enough to say that I'm currently doing Master's thesis on road safety. Just sharing whatever raw data I have here. This thread is a good place to start.