tl;dr

is this the one i heard higher end models like preve/suprima ada itu apa lotus tech

what engine will fly out if langgar depan instead of going in to make u patah kaki etc etc

got such thing?

tl;dr

is this the one i heard higher end models like preve/suprima ada itu apa lotus tech

what engine will fly out if langgar depan instead of going in to make u patah kaki etc etc

got such thing?

no such thing in proton

inline 4 engine is too thick to slide out, it will only get stucked and cause the car to high side or even flip

usually porsche's horizontal 6 or subaru's boxer 4 can utilise this method of reducing impact to driver

this is the right protocol for engine dismount

preve engine is too thick, or squarish to do this, there is no point to dismount it and still have it in front of your knee or flying to the other side of the road or flying into your face through the front windscreen.

It should have a guided path, not killing innocent people across the road.

In the case of broken preve mounting in accident, that's just due to the huge impact and the mounting couldn't take it. simple as that. It just somehow didnt hit anyone walking pass. or it would make into world news

this is the right protocol for engine dismount

preve engine is too thick, or squarish to do this, there is no point to dismount it and still have it in front of your knee or flying to the other side of the road or flying into your face through the front windscreen.

It should have a guided path, not killing innocent people across the road.

In the case of broken preve mounting in accident, that's just due to the huge impact and the mounting couldn't take it. simple as that. It just somehow didnt hit anyone walking pass. or it would make into world news

well i have to disappoint you. it meant that they crashed too hard, and the mounting couldn't stand the force, just like preve. cars aint even built to withstand an impact velocity of 110km/h

Even IIHS themselves admitted that engine flying off is abnormal. IIHS is one of the leading crash testing organization funded by insurer

http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/fe...peed-car-crash/

i'd trust these IIHS engineers more than proton, definitely

Even IIHS themselves admitted that engine flying off is abnormal

EXPLOSIONS AND ENGINE EJECTIONS

Conspiracy theorists probably don't want to hear it, but Puckett says he's seen all sorts of mechanical combustions, from engine ejections to vehicle fires to cars sawed in half by stationary objects. "The engine is hot," Puckett says. "There are any number of fluids that can ignite, and I'm sorry to say that [that] isn't indicative of foul play."

Wheat, Zirby, and Bates also corroborate Puckett's conclusion; cars traveling at a high velocity slamming into hard objects aren't really designed to prevent such violent ends. While engine ejections and explosions aren't necessarily the norm, they aren't as rare as most of us would guess.

"I think we've become complacent, where we think all this technology is going to save us no matter what," says Bates. "But you have to keep in mind—there are crashes that are not survivable."

well i have to disappoint you. it meant that they crashed too hard, and the mounting couldn't stand the force, just like preve. cars aint even built to withstand an impact velocity of 110km/h

Even IIHS themselves admitted that engine flying off is abnormal. IIHS is one of the leading crash testing organization funded by insurer

http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/fe...peed-car-crash/

i'd trust these IIHS engineers more than proton, definitely

On the flip side....

Victims who survive an accident in a safe Proton whereby the car is written off, suddenly found themselves in a financial quandary because the total loss payout is not enough to settle their 9 year loan due to poor market value (and hence insured value) of Proton cars

'aren't necessarily the norm', it meant it is not normal

'it isnt rare' because it is a problem due to be fixed by these car makers in a high speed crash

and, i myself is an engineer holding M.Eng from world top 100 university, and currently a PhD candidate, i believe in datas. Until proton's engineer show us the simulation or mathematical model, it's just syiok sendiri self claimed since the engine didnt hit anyone, they can get away with it

Also, it doesn't take an engineer to figure out that a flying 200kg metal block is dangerous.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1862727/woman...d-horror-smash/

It should be detached, yes, but guided at an angle, below the car. It can only be easily achieved when your engine is built with a decline towards the undercarriage as shown

below is subaru's design


this is mercedes's design


another approach to detached engine is like volvo, build the engine as part of shock absorbent and just let it crumble between the firewalls

Proton is the first car maker that is proud of their running wild flying engine, when it hit someone, the CEO is going to be in deep shit

if im not mistaken so far only 1 death for preve
which is a police officer speeding without wearing seatbelt

why still no polis death in preve in the list?
i kind of remember there's a case preve police car speeding get accident and one policeman death because not wearing seatbelt and ejected out from the car. that's not counted?

apasal me, I small ciku je who sometimes share whatever little I know.

Your discussion with Subang Nuclear Reactor is interesting, never really read about concerns of flying drivetrain components in a collision..... please don't let me interrupt 

Oh and it's boy96 you're looking for, he is sifu level