Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Exhaust For AUTO, ???

views
     
sledgehammer
post Mar 16 2007, 09:58 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
664 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cheras, KL


maybe on of the forumer here kweng can answer ur question... he got customer who change to twinloop... but the car is civic la..

fr what i heard twinloop benefit vtec most.... auto car also benefited fr it.... smile.gif
farique
post Mar 16 2007, 09:38 PM

8_8
*******
Senior Member
2,147 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
okay, let get things spicy a little in here..

I have a doubt, according to what Gouki's posted (http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/tech/991...xhaust_systems/) I got confused on what is backpressure. At first, it stated there that the exhaust at least needs backpressure and while you keep on reading, it will says that engine doesnt need backpressure. Now, what is the difference between this two? The exhaust needs backpressure? But why?

Aside from changing the muffler unit, why not redo the tubing of the exhaust to gain power? Does this can be done? Use new tubing size from CC to muffler and ends with original muffler. How?
tunertoobe
post Mar 16 2007, 10:24 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


QUOTE(farique @ Mar 16 2007, 09:38 PM)
okay, let get things spicy a little in here..

I have a doubt, according to what Gouki's posted (http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/tech/991...xhaust_systems/) I got confused on what is backpressure. At first, it stated there that the exhaust at least needs backpressure and while you keep on reading, it will says that engine doesnt need backpressure. Now, what is the difference between this two? The exhaust needs backpressure? But why?

Aside from changing the muffler unit, why not redo the tubing of the exhaust to gain power? Does this can be done? Use new tubing size from CC to muffler and ends with original muffler. How?
*
If you read carefully, the article said:
"Some self-proclaimed engine gurus claim too large of an exhaust tube on a car can cause problems; engines need a certain amount of backpressure to run correctly."

That was someone else's claim. Now this is his answer for that claim:
"Although the statement about not running too large of a tube is correct, the assumption about engines needing backpressure is not."
TSjasondotcom
post Mar 16 2007, 10:46 PM

F**K RACISM
******
Senior Member
1,630 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


hummm....ok... now refering to my drawing posted in the first page... is my exhaust considered s-flow?
Kagaya
post Mar 16 2007, 11:46 PM

Bad-Badtz Maru FREAK !!!
Group Icon
Elite
2,396 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pandan Perdana, Cheras, KL



QUOTE(tunertoobe @ Mar 16 2007, 10:24 PM)
If you read carefully, the article said:
"Some self-proclaimed engine gurus claim too large of an exhaust tube on a car can cause problems; engines need a certain amount of backpressure to run correctly."

That was someone else's claim. Now this is his answer for that claim:
"Although the statement about not running too large of a tube is correct, the assumption about engines needing backpressure is not."
*
I think I happened to read in NST Car,Bikes and Trucks regarding backpressure.

Assuming that after the exhaust cycle, exhaust exiting the pipe flows in high velocity, creating a vacuum as it leaves the pipe.

But, before the gas fully left, the vacuum effect siphoned the air-gas mixture before the valve fully closed in such rapid movement. Without the necessary pressure to helps the valve close in time, air-gas mixture exits with the exhaust together, resulting in the waste of unburnt air-gas mixture (gas is gasoline, or fuel).

Well, that's what it says and why those big MILO TIN is having ultra high FC, loud rumbling of an asthmatic elephant but no power to fart.
DreMAx
post Mar 17 2007, 12:23 AM

Nature's Best Music
*******
Senior Member
3,799 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: All Over The Place


QUOTE(Kagaya @ Mar 16 2007, 11:46 PM)
I think I happened to read in NST Car,Bikes and Trucks regarding backpressure.

Assuming that after the exhaust cycle, exhaust exiting the pipe flows in high velocity, creating a vacuum as it leaves the pipe.

But, before the gas fully left, the vacuum effect siphoned the air-gas mixture before the valve fully closed in such rapid movement. Without the necessary pressure to helps the valve close in time, air-gas mixture exits with the exhaust together, resulting in the waste of unburnt air-gas mixture (gas is gasoline, or fuel).

Well, that's what it says and why those big MILO TIN is having ultra high FC, loud rumbling of an asthmatic elephant but no power to fart.
*
Talking about the MILO TINS right, they don't sound that good either. Compared to my stock 1987 Nissan Sentra's exhaust, it sound's better.
tunertoobe
post Mar 17 2007, 10:37 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


QUOTE(Kagaya @ Mar 16 2007, 11:46 PM)
I think I happened to read in NST Car,Bikes and Trucks regarding backpressure.

Assuming that after the exhaust cycle, exhaust exiting the pipe flows in high velocity, creating a vacuum as it leaves the pipe.

But, before the gas fully left, the vacuum effect siphoned the air-gas mixture before the valve fully closed in such rapid movement. Without the necessary pressure to helps the valve close in time, air-gas mixture exits with the exhaust together, resulting in the waste of unburnt air-gas mixture (gas is gasoline, or fuel).

Well, that's what it says and why those big MILO TIN is having ultra high FC, loud rumbling of an asthmatic elephant but no power to fart.
*
Then you'd have to reset the valve timing, don't you? After that, you'd get the max benefit, right?
I'm not sure, still learning about all the valve timing and stuff so please forgive me. sweat.gif
Those milo tin exhaust slows down the velocity of exhaust gases so therefore there is little to no scavenging.
The vacuum is good so that it could help suck in fuel and air because the intake stroke is one of the dead-stroke, there is no power produced, only drag. Having something to help with that I think is good.

I still believe no backpressure is good. biggrin.gif
farique
post Mar 17 2007, 10:54 AM

8_8
*******
Senior Member
2,147 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
QUOTE(jasondotcom @ Mar 16 2007, 10:46 PM)
hummm....ok... now refering to my drawing posted in the first page... is my exhaust considered s-flow?
*
yes, yours is an S-flow muffler.. a straight flow muffler would be those you see in exhaust shop where the size is not big and you can see through the hole. Basically, all stock cars uses S-flow muffler...

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/muffler3.htm

man.. I'm totally lost with this backpressure thingy lol..
seantang
post Mar 17 2007, 08:02 PM

With Adult Supervision Only
*******
Senior Member
6,624 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: singapore & ipoh


I don't know about Myvis, but for an engine like the 1.8L 4G93 with an autobox which spends 99% of its time at 2500-4000rpm, a good exhaust upgrade that maximises power at those rpms (I don't care about sound) will be a straight flow muffler with an internal diameter of roughly 1.7" (which is more or less the same with the stock piping). The stock piping is actually sufficient but the problem is that there are too many kinks, restricting flow. Change that stock piping to mandrel bent piping of the same 1.7" diameter, and remove the resonators.

The end effect will be a direct flowing exhaust of 1.7" inner diameter all the way from the extractor to the exhaust tip... ie. no increases or decreases in inner diameter (ie. volume) from one end to the opposite end. That should maximise the output of the 1.8L engine between 2500-4000rpm.
Vervain
post Mar 18 2007, 09:58 PM

Scathach
*******
Senior Member
5,464 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
i wanna ask if there is any dramactical loss in power if i install 2 exhaust on my new wira se
farique
post Mar 20 2007, 11:40 AM

8_8
*******
Senior Member
2,147 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
QUOTE(Vervain @ Mar 18 2007, 09:58 PM)
i wanna ask if there is any dramactical loss in power if i install 2 exhaust on my new wira se
*
urm.. do you by means those twin pipe you see on the Myvi's and 350Zs?
If you are looking at that, its just the muffler tip. They still uses one exhaust but the outlet from the exhaust being divided into two and ends with a nice muffler tip. That's all. So, power loss? None.

If your car has twin turbo setup, then you can use 2 exhaust, one for each turbine.. hahahaha.. XD
tatayoung
post Mar 21 2007, 12:15 AM

I'm the boss of me...
*****
Senior Member
950 posts

Joined: Sep 2004


Well.....on my saga 1.5(auto...) i was using the original muffler(which is s-flow) and i changed it to one of em tembak bulan pipes(got a lil excited... tongue.gif )...the result-revs went up much higher...and i mean that....but gear shifting was a problem...i had to pay with the accelarator pedal for the engine to shift gears....but to get to the point of having to shift gears was never a problem....later on i changed to an s-flow muffler(2-inches)...the engine shifts much better now....or should i say it shifts the way an amt is supposed to shift....but i definately that it takes longer to rev to 4k.....Btw....i'm using an open pod filter where air gets sucked in super fast....
shinjite
post Mar 21 2007, 03:11 AM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


QUOTE(farique @ Mar 20 2007, 11:40 AM)
urm.. do you by means those twin pipe you see on the Myvi's and 350Zs?
If you are looking at that, its just the muffler tip. They still uses one exhaust but the outlet from the exhaust being divided into two and ends with a nice muffler tip. That's all. So, power loss? None.

If your car has twin turbo setup, then you can use 2 exhaust, one for each turbine.. hahahaha.. XD
*
if u wanna look nice like the 350Zs, the right muffler is just for display
Focus all on the left 1 which is the original output smile.gif
TSjasondotcom
post May 2 2007, 05:08 PM

F**K RACISM
******
Senior Member
1,630 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(seantang @ Mar 17 2007, 08:02 PM)
I don't know about Myvis, but for an engine like the 1.8L 4G93 with an autobox which spends 99% of its time at 2500-4000rpm, a good exhaust upgrade that maximises power at those rpms (I don't care about sound) will be a straight flow muffler with an internal diameter of roughly 1.7" (which is more or less the same with the stock piping). The stock piping is actually sufficient but the problem is that there are too many kinks, restricting flow. Change that stock piping to mandrel bent piping of the same 1.7" diameter, and remove the resonators.

The end effect will be a direct flowing exhaust of 1.7" inner diameter all the way from the extractor to the exhaust tip... ie. no increases or decreases in inner diameter (ie. volume) from one end to the opposite end. That should maximise the output of the 1.8L engine between 2500-4000rpm.
*
Humm... so ur opinion is free flow with no back pressure is good for automatics? rclxub.gif
seantang
post May 2 2007, 06:05 PM

With Adult Supervision Only
*******
Senior Member
6,624 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: singapore & ipoh


QUOTE(jasondotcom @ May 2 2007, 05:08 PM)
Humm... so ur opinion is free flow with no back pressure is good for automatics?  rclxub.gif
Yes that is indeed my opinion. A free flowing exhaust with no back pressure is good for any car, automatic or manual.

An engine+auto is no different to the same engine+manual trans. The only difference is the rpms where the driver spends most of their time.
TSjasondotcom
post May 2 2007, 11:29 PM

F**K RACISM
******
Senior Member
1,630 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(seantang @ May 2 2007, 06:05 PM)
Yes that is indeed my opinion. A free flowing exhaust with no back pressure is good for any car, automatic or manual.

An engine+auto is no different to the same engine+manual trans. The only difference is the rpms where the driver spends most of their time.
*
But lotsa ppl are going around saying that auto will lose a lot of torque / power at the lower range of the rpm if using free flow / straight flow exhaust?

Just askin.... icon_rolleyes.gif

egiewan
post May 3 2007, 12:38 AM

aL-|ncognito
*******
Senior Member
6,777 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Wangsa Melawati, Kuala Lumpur



QUOTE(jasondotcom @ May 2 2007, 11:29 PM)
But lotsa ppl are going around saying that auto will lose a lot of torque / power at the lower range of the rpm if using free flow / straight flow exhaust?

Just askin....  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
I dunno how to explain but in fact it is true. Low end power damn sucky....but once the car climbs above 4000rpm the power can be felt. Auto must always use S-flow mufflers. It is possible to use straight flow but pickup like dead liddat laugh.gif
shinjite
post May 3 2007, 01:19 AM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


Yeah I experience it myself, lower rpm region, you get nothing but loud noise....around 3.5K and 4K range then you can feel the torque
synn
post May 3 2007, 03:48 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
420 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
Auto car can have a nice sound with some nice exhaust...
i heard it be4... quite nice
all is related to ur wallet la...=.=
"monay monay monay" lolx
m|ng
post May 3 2007, 09:10 AM

U want a piece of me?!
******
Senior Member
1,863 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang, Land of Laksa and Char Koay Teow


I heard auto cars must put like 2 bullets?
Aint that a bit restrictive?

yea, exhaust system for auto cars is a bit tricky.. kenot do this and that..

3 Pages < 1 2 3 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0198sec    0.64    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 02:21 AM