Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Q&A sessions on legal issues, ask me *wink*, Criminal, civil, family, probate.... ALL
|
EternalC
|
Apr 5 2017, 11:10 AM
|
|
i want to know why criminals jail time are to run concurrently?
each of his crime adds a scar to their victims, and yet he get all punishment run in 1 go.
for example, he get 5 years for this, and another 5 years for that. total 10, but he just need to be jailed for 5 years in reality.
apa logic
|
|
|
|
|
|
EternalC
|
Apr 6 2017, 12:41 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Abam_Beruang @ Apr 6 2017, 12:38 PM) Court has the discretion in deciding whether the jail terms to run concurrently or consecutively. Normally they will consider a few factors to guide them, whether it is a one transaction, whether such offences are distinct offences, and to look at the sentencing in totality (whether it is excessive). If John was convicted for 2 drug offences, one packet of drugs found inside his pocket, and another one inside his car on the same day. Normally in such circumstances, it will run concurrently. If John robbed a lady and subsequently raped her, it is a two separate offence though it was committed in a single transaction, then it is likely that it will run consecutively. Anyway those are guiding factors only. but i see many cases of rape, dif date dif place dif time, all add up would exceed 100 years, but was given to run concurrently. damage done to victim adds up one by one, while rapist gets to go through it all one time only
|
|
|
|
|