Apr 16 2017, 07:43 PM
QUOTE(incubus_skj @ Apr 16 2017, 01:47 PM)
>Mirrorless
>pricy
>low lens selection
Lol. Unless you're shooting sports or using a full frame, mirrorless trumps all of these in spades.
A Panasonic G85 that shoots 4k video and has Dual IS only costs RM 3.5k
A 100-400mm (200-800mm in FF) PanaLeica lens only costs 6k. A PanaLeica 25mm 1.4 (50mm in FF) only costs ~RM2.5k
Panasonic and Olympus lenses are interchangeable with both brands' bodies. How are they inferior to APSC DSLR again?
Most olympus/ panasonic lenses are so much more expensive compared to the nikon/ canon equivalent. and how is a 50mm f1.4 equivalent lens "only" costs rm2.5k? >pricy
>low lens selection
Lol. Unless you're shooting sports or using a full frame, mirrorless trumps all of these in spades.
A Panasonic G85 that shoots 4k video and has Dual IS only costs RM 3.5k
A 100-400mm (200-800mm in FF) PanaLeica lens only costs 6k. A PanaLeica 25mm 1.4 (50mm in FF) only costs ~RM2.5k
Panasonic and Olympus lenses are interchangeable with both brands' bodies. How are they inferior to APSC DSLR again?
dslrs are still unbeatable in terms of lens prices and availability, especially when it comes to 3rd party lenses.
Quote
0.0185sec
1.01
7 queries
GZIP Disabled