are they planning to overpopulate KL to overcome oversupply houses in Klang Valley?

apart from just merely balik kampung..
this plan is actually build for utilizing the ports in east coast region, especially Kuantan port where Chinese company are still upgrading since few years back.
the purpose is to let the vessel unload @ kuantan port and than pakai train to reach KV, so they could by pass Singapore. this way the vessel could save 3 days time compare to now.
read frm somewhere but forgotten frm mana already. as a kuantanese who frequent travel to KL, i tracking this ECRM news for few years already.

same as MCKIP?

MCKIP is part of the grand plan. it s not far from the port also.

Ahh save 3 days journey already like few millions $$
Can save shipping cost

Near Karak highway Bentong exit and Kg. Tambai.

Im quite shock, PEKAN was not under the grand plan..

research suggest it's actually increase the shipping cost to compensate the time save if transfer cargo in at port kuantan and out at port klang.

so most likely it's only replacement of penisular malaysia domestic shipment from port klang to port kuantan.

Logistics is their main business..
GOMBAK will prone to be like Gebeng..Bauxite..Orange everywhere

Public transport is Lekat celah gigi business..

PM discuss with the attendants during the ECRL launch, they are propose a route from kuantan to pekan.

Bauxite are exported directly to China from Kuantan/Kemaman port.

i second that.
the increased cost were not too much based on the "research"
. but i forget the suggested amount.

Good..

train stations can always branch out. have to set up the main infrastructure first.

i see..if he branch out..i think maybe he is also planning to develop tanjong agas?

Oh it's increase cost..
I thought save cost. Since gomen so eagerly promoting the ECRL project

What if govt change hand, will this ECRL project continues like business as usual??

to upvote??

ECRL is a project benefit to rakyat in east coast..
if govt change hand, i bet the project still continue but more cost effective mayb?

Objective and long run this project is great.

but the transparency of the project cost is a question.