Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Fujifilm FinePix Z5fd

views
     
TSjdreamer
post Mar 4 2007, 02:25 PM, updated 19y ago

Screw ITP!
********
Senior Member
11,092 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
From: Melbourne



http://www.dpreview.com/news/0611/06110901finepixz5fd.asp

What do you guys think of this camera? Worth getting?

Asking for a friend.

This post has been edited by jdreamer: Mar 4 2007, 02:28 PM
greyPJ
post Mar 4 2007, 04:03 PM

artificially stupid
*******
Senior Member
3,169 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
yes, worth buying if under RM1K.

neaevia
post Mar 27 2007, 04:51 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: 4dTymB-nKL



i already bought.... biggrin.gif for about rm999 cash promotion with free 512mb xd card+cam case+tripod

one thing i dont like, is the lense placement.

its very easy to accidently get fingerprint on it sad.gif thats why i dont let anyone use it.. yet tongue.gif hehe
greyPJ
post Mar 27 2007, 04:54 PM

artificially stupid
*******
Senior Member
3,169 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(neaevia @ Mar 27 2007, 04:51 PM)
i already bought.... biggrin.gif for about rm999 cash promotion with free 512mb xd card+cam case+tripod

one thing i dont like, is the lense placement.

its very easy to accidently get fingerprint on it sad.gif thats why i dont let anyone use it.. yet tongue.gif hehe
*
can you take some lowlight pics at iso800 and 1600, upload full-size to
http://reg.imageshack.us/

i cant find any samples over the net. thx.


Added on March 27, 2007, 4:55 pmoh, dont PP pls....................

This post has been edited by greyPJ: Mar 27 2007, 04:55 PM
Gadget_Freak
post Mar 27 2007, 05:02 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
414 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
yeah yeah take some samples shot on high iso, wanna compare it with f31fd.

nice camera by fuji..reasonable price too
neaevia
post Mar 28 2007, 03:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: 4dTymB-nKL



okie dokie... I will try it tonight...lowlight pics at ISO 800 & 1600.. I'll post it tomorrow smile.gif

p/s: dummy question... is lowlight pics = night pics? blush.gif
CompMac
post Mar 28 2007, 03:21 PM

世界見てください
******
Senior Member
1,573 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Slave in Seremban...


As long as no sunlight or taken inside a dimly lit room will be considered as low light.
greyPJ
post Mar 28 2007, 04:01 PM

artificially stupid
*******
Senior Member
3,169 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(neaevia @ Mar 28 2007, 03:16 PM)
okie dokie... I will try it tonight...lowlight pics at ISO 800 & 1600.. I'll post it tomorrow smile.gif

p/s: dummy question... is lowlight pics = night pics? blush.gif
*
what CompMac said^
and also dont use flash. tq.
??!!
post Mar 28 2007, 04:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,548 posts

Joined: May 2005
What (if any) differences are there between fuji's Z series and f series?


greyPJ
post Mar 28 2007, 04:48 PM

artificially stupid
*******
Senior Member
3,169 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(??!! @ Mar 28 2007, 04:16 PM)
What (if any) differences are there between fuji's Z series and f series?
*
z = folded optical, f=protruding
z=smaller ccd 1/2.5, f =bigger 1/1.7
z=slim, compete with slim cam like sony t series.
??!!
post Mar 28 2007, 04:59 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,548 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(greyPJ @ Mar 28 2007, 04:48 PM)
z = folded optical, f=protruding
z=smaller ccd 1/2.5, f =bigger 1/1.7
z=slim, compete with slim cam like sony t series.
*
except for the sensor size, these diff are cosmestic in nature.

What about image quality?...my instinct says more serious photograhper will opt for f series?
greyPJ
post Mar 28 2007, 05:04 PM

artificially stupid
*******
Senior Member
3,169 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(??!! @ Mar 28 2007, 04:59 PM)
except for the sensor size, these diff are cosmestic in nature.

What about image quality?...my instinct says more serious photograhper will opt for f  series?
*
yes f series IQ is definitely better, but dunno by how much, still waiting for pics from neaevia.

z series aim for ladies mkt, comes in pink, slim etc...
neaevia
post Mar 28 2007, 05:07 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: 4dTymB-nKL



yup Z series aim for fashion+ladies.

definitely a turn on for someone like me... biggrin.gif

so dont blame it if it got lousy pix.. its for show...LOL i just degraded myself
??!!
post Mar 28 2007, 05:43 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,548 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(greyPJ @ Mar 28 2007, 05:04 PM)
z series aim for ladies mkt, comes in pink, slim etc...
*
QUOTE(neaevia @ Mar 28 2007, 05:07 PM)
yup Z series aim for fashion+ladies.

definitely a turn on for someone like me... biggrin.gif

so dont blame it if it got lousy pix.. its for show...LOL i just degraded myself
*
I put a big X on cameras that do not have profile for hand grip. How to take good pix when can't have a steady hold on the camera?

Not all ladies go for pink and slim
Itu camera untuk ambil gambar ke untuk tayang fesyen?

This post has been edited by ??!!: Mar 28 2007, 05:43 PM
greyPJ
post Mar 28 2007, 06:31 PM

artificially stupid
*******
Senior Member
3,169 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
looks ok to me, got a spot to put the thumb, finger on top the shutter button.
neaevia
post Mar 28 2007, 10:00 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: 4dTymB-nKL



QUOTE(??!! @ Mar 28 2007, 05:43 PM)
I put a big X on cameras that do not have profile for hand grip. How to take good pix when can't have a steady hold on the camera?

Not all ladies go for pink and slim
Itu camera untuk ambil gambar ke untuk tayang fesyen?
*
i think u should put the big X on the cam then.. when i first got it. i find it difficult to get steadyshots when i am not on auto mode + anti blur. cuz definitely got shake one.

but u need lotsa practice with this cam to keep it steady & to avoid finger prints on the lense

Anyhowww...... heres the pix..both pix at 3.5f... dunno how to change that setting... sweat.gif

ISO 800
user posted image

ISO 1600
user posted image

This post has been edited by neaevia: Mar 28 2007, 10:17 PM
greyPJ
post Mar 28 2007, 10:38 PM

artificially stupid
*******
Senior Member
3,169 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(neaevia @ Mar 28 2007, 10:00 PM)


Anyhowww...... heres the pix..both pix at 3.5f... dunno how to change that setting...  sweat.gif

ISO 800

ISO 1600
*
very good iso800, better than canon/sony with same sensor size.
Gadget_Freak
post Mar 28 2007, 10:42 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
414 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
decent iso performance but not as impressive as f31fd
aba9785
post Mar 29 2007, 12:12 AM

el aba9785
*****
Senior Member
743 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Penang


QUOTE(Gadget_Freak @ Mar 28 2007, 10:42 PM)
decent iso performance but not as impressive as f31fd
*
not bad, not bad rclxms.gif

neaevia, from the photo
i can conclude that if u wanna get good indoor/low light photo
dont use ISO over than 400
ISO 400 with/without flash would be good enough for low noise yet usable photo
biggrin.gif


neaevia
post Mar 29 2007, 08:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: 4dTymB-nKL



heres the sample at ISO400
user posted image

This post has been edited by neaevia: Mar 29 2007, 08:52 AM

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0181sec    0.30    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 05:28 AM