http://www.dpreview.com/news/0611/06110901finepixz5fd.asp
What do you guys think of this camera? Worth getting?
Asking for a friend.
This post has been edited by jdreamer: Mar 4 2007, 02:28 PM
Fujifilm FinePix Z5fd
Fujifilm FinePix Z5fd
|
|
Mar 4 2007, 02:25 PM, updated 19y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
11,092 posts Joined: Nov 2005 From: Melbourne |
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0611/06110901finepixz5fd.asp
What do you guys think of this camera? Worth getting? Asking for a friend. This post has been edited by jdreamer: Mar 4 2007, 02:28 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 4 2007, 04:03 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,169 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
yes, worth buying if under RM1K.
|
|
|
Mar 27 2007, 04:51 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
116 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: 4dTymB-nKL |
i already bought....
one thing i dont like, is the lense placement. its very easy to accidently get fingerprint on it |
|
|
Mar 27 2007, 04:54 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,169 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(neaevia @ Mar 27 2007, 04:51 PM) i already bought.... can you take some lowlight pics at iso800 and 1600, upload full-size to one thing i dont like, is the lense placement. its very easy to accidently get fingerprint on it http://reg.imageshack.us/ i cant find any samples over the net. thx. Added on March 27, 2007, 4:55 pmoh, dont PP pls.................... This post has been edited by greyPJ: Mar 27 2007, 04:55 PM |
|
|
Mar 27 2007, 05:02 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
414 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
yeah yeah take some samples shot on high iso, wanna compare it with f31fd.
nice camera by fuji..reasonable price too |
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 03:16 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
116 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: 4dTymB-nKL |
okie dokie... I will try it tonight...lowlight pics at ISO 800 & 1600.. I'll post it tomorrow
p/s: dummy question... is lowlight pics = night pics? |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 03:21 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,573 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Slave in Seremban... |
As long as no sunlight or taken inside a dimly lit room will be considered as low light.
|
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 04:01 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,169 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 04:16 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,548 posts Joined: May 2005 |
What (if any) differences are there between fuji's Z series and f series?
|
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 04:48 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,169 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 04:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,548 posts Joined: May 2005 |
QUOTE(greyPJ @ Mar 28 2007, 04:48 PM) z = folded optical, f=protruding except for the sensor size, these diff are cosmestic in nature. z=smaller ccd 1/2.5, f =bigger 1/1.7 z=slim, compete with slim cam like sony t series. What about image quality?...my instinct says more serious photograhper will opt for f series? |
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 05:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,169 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(??!! @ Mar 28 2007, 04:59 PM) except for the sensor size, these diff are cosmestic in nature. yes f series IQ is definitely better, but dunno by how much, still waiting for pics from neaevia.What about image quality?...my instinct says more serious photograhper will opt for f series? z series aim for ladies mkt, comes in pink, slim etc... |
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 05:07 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
116 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: 4dTymB-nKL |
yup Z series aim for fashion+ladies.
definitely a turn on for someone like me... so dont blame it if it got lousy pix.. its for show...LOL i just degraded myself |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 05:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,548 posts Joined: May 2005 |
QUOTE(greyPJ @ Mar 28 2007, 05:04 PM) QUOTE(neaevia @ Mar 28 2007, 05:07 PM) yup Z series aim for fashion+ladies. I put a big X on cameras that do not have profile for hand grip. How to take good pix when can't have a steady hold on the camera?definitely a turn on for someone like me... so dont blame it if it got lousy pix.. its for show...LOL i just degraded myself Not all ladies go for pink and slim Itu camera untuk ambil gambar ke untuk tayang fesyen? This post has been edited by ??!!: Mar 28 2007, 05:43 PM |
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 06:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,169 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
looks ok to me, got a spot to put the thumb, finger on top the shutter button.
|
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 10:00 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
116 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: 4dTymB-nKL |
QUOTE(??!! @ Mar 28 2007, 05:43 PM) I put a big X on cameras that do not have profile for hand grip. How to take good pix when can't have a steady hold on the camera? i think u should put the big X on the cam then.. when i first got it. i find it difficult to get steadyshots when i am not on auto mode + anti blur. cuz definitely got shake one.Not all ladies go for pink and slim Itu camera untuk ambil gambar ke untuk tayang fesyen? but u need lotsa practice with this cam to keep it steady & to avoid finger prints on the lense Anyhowww...... heres the pix..both pix at 3.5f... dunno how to change that setting... ISO 800 ![]() ISO 1600 ![]() This post has been edited by neaevia: Mar 28 2007, 10:17 PM |
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 10:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,169 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 10:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
414 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
decent iso performance but not as impressive as f31fd
|
|
|
Mar 29 2007, 12:12 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
743 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: Penang |
QUOTE(Gadget_Freak @ Mar 28 2007, 10:42 PM) not bad, not bad neaevia, from the photo i can conclude that if u wanna get good indoor/low light photo dont use ISO over than 400 ISO 400 with/without flash would be good enough for low noise yet usable photo |
|
|
Mar 29 2007, 08:51 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
116 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: 4dTymB-nKL |
|
| Change to: | 0.0181sec
0.30
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 05:28 AM |