i just got my bronze pink today , the accessories coming with 5v charger and  sony  MH410c earphone, which i find it better than our local in ear headphone haha

oh well, i was getting it from T & L telecom, the charger is bad, i thought will give me 9v fast charger LOL

Okay.

So here is my personal comparison between XZP and U11

Design:
Ignoring the same design with previous xperia or much more elegant aluminum body of previous htc, i find both are equally great in design perspective, in their own way. XZP gives impression of elegance with its materials n shape.
U11 has a bit outdated shape, but feels the best in hand and pocket due to its curve back. Also IMHO the colour is really nice.

Display:
XZP has very rich and vibrant colour, but i still feel sony should set the default at 2k reso. Once your eyes used to 2k display, u can still see the the pixels or lack or sharpness fhd provides.

The 4K capability is nice, but personally I wont watch 4K video as frequent as I watch FHD or even 2K content.

htc u11 superLCD display has more natural colours and due to its 2k native display, it looks sharper at all time.

Sound:
Both has dual speaker, but u11 is definitely better in terms of quality and loudness. I wont comment on earphone because using different earphone is a bit unfair.

Rear Camera:
Outdoors with good lighting, both are equivalently good. However in low light, XZP is way better.

For video, both are good but htc lacks advanced option in this mode.

Front camera:
I'm not a selfie type but i think u11 front camera tends to over expose at all time. The quality is better than XZP though.

Performance:
Both are fast. No hiccups. But htc u11 doesnt keep background apps as good as XZP does.

UI:
Im a blinkfeed fan - easier for me to read all my reading materials from various sources at one place.
Also, sorry to say but for me there's nothing special about sony's ui.

Battery:
Not fair to compare because I have different sets of apps running on both phones. But both phones can easily last u  from morning till night.

So which one do i choose? Seriously both are really good. For me, XZP is the clear winner in camera part. It's weird because htc u11 is touted as highest scoring mobile phone camera by DxOMark. But the low light quality and over expose front camera is a let down.  But other than the camera, U11 is my pick

The sound quality is bad.

Tad better than the Samsungs, but they are just way behind HTC.

I do but it won't leave residue on the lens, since it has a silicone layer.

I do but it won't leave residue on the lens, since it has a silicone layer.

Got it together when purchased their SP.

Yes. Regardless which side, they will provide you at least 2 set; one for the lens one for the tri-sensors.

Nope. I have dealt with IMOS plenty of times, so kudos to them for supplying both together regardless which sides.
Even I got a free one for the front side.

I applied but didn't remove it. I assume that we can use alcohol to clean off the residue in due course.

Sony Center?
Try to source for UCB20/30 or CP-AC100 at least.

My XZ (with Devilcase Aluminum frame) just dropped from shoulder height this morning. Caused a small scratch onto the alum frame but doesn't hurt the phone. Scare the sh*t out but lucky me

After using this phone for a week, my thoughts:

Pros:
1. excellent built quality. i love how it looks and feels in the palm of my hands. Glass panel front and back attract fingerprints but i dont mind. it is not really that slippery.
2. Great battery life...my SOT is around 5.5 - 6 hours.
3. the 960 fps slow mo are awesome, but the thing is how frequent do we use it in real life? i havnt tested the camera in low light yet. but i wont put too much hope on it.
4. the fingerprint scanner at the right side below the volume rocker are really perfectly placed. super quick. it is the second one i feel impressed after using op3 fingerprint scanner. but honestly i prefer sony fingerprint scanner than others.
Cons:
1. the stereo speakers are very soft. even my old xperia z3 plus speakers are louder. of coz not as great as the loudness of my op3. when plug in original sony earphone also soft (no surprise at all)
2. when playing games u can notice some frame drops. not obvious but coming from op3 i can notice the difference.
3.  4k hdr display is awesome but i wonder when will i trully use it? so far i only use this phone for 4k youtube videos viewing which is not really that frequent.

to be continue...

After using this phone for a week, my thoughts:

Pros:
1. excellent built quality. i love how it looks and feels in the palm of my hands. Glass panel front and back attract fingerprints but i dont mind. it is not really that slippery.
2. Great battery life...my SOT is around 5.5 - 6 hours.
3. the 960 fps slow mo are awesome, but the thing is how frequent do we use it in real life? i havnt tested the camera in low light yet. but i wont put too much hope on it.
4. the fingerprint scanner at the right side below the volume rocker are really perfectly placed. super quick. it is the second one i feel impressed after using op3 fingerprint scanner. but honestly i prefer sony fingerprint scanner than others.
Cons:
1. the stereo speakers are very soft. even my old xperia z3 plus speakers are louder. of coz not as great as the loudness of my op3. when plug in original sony earphone also soft (no surprise at all)
2. when playing games u can notice some frame drops. not obvious but coming from op3 i can notice the difference.
3.  4k hdr display is awesome but i wonder when will i trully use it? so far i only use this phone for 4k youtube videos viewing which is not really that frequent.

to be continue...

Yes... Too bad.. Sigh.. Indoor lighting also got lots of noise

Not sure.. I'm using clear audio.. Got difference meh? Haha

just now i turned on s force la...no cracking sound that u mentioned bro..u meant the sound "pecah"?..but i made it clearaudio coz i felt that is the loudest...haha