QUOTE(wongmunkeong @ Mar 8 2017, 06:53 AM)
hm.. i think U are assuming all PRS funds returns <=1%pa?
heheh. please do check first - not all PRS funds as as "good"
as for short vs long term, er.. dont U think think equities will "grow in price" in the long term due to inflation, economic growth, etc?
isn't that long term thinking?
also - the tax relief, be it <=15% or >=24.5%, isn't that also long term thinking? every year, "make" that % and use the cold hard cash for FD, stocks, mortgage extra paydown, etc.?
in addition - those below 30s, with the Gov extra incentive.. still not worthwhile?
hm.. U running your own biz returning way more than the combined above in %pa terms?
if so, good BUT the above is passive or non-active income/assets.
if one wishes to compare active income - IMHO, better to use things like trading in options, forex, futures, margin stocks & flipping properties.
no absolute right/wrong, just perspectives

Maybe I did not make my sentence clearer...
What i meant was the initial tax relief you got when amortised (new word to me) over a long period of time, the advantage is probably not going to worth it for all the hassle of PRS..
E.g. you get 20% tax rebate from the PRS, and you still have 20 years before you can withdraw this money. This works out to roughly 1% p.a. which means whatever your PRS return was that year, you add 1% return to it.
So this versus you put this money into FSM or whatever and actively manage it whereby you are free to choose between hundreds of UT products and you are free to withdraw all during a freefall..
Hope you get the gist of what I am trying to say, I aint well-versed in economic terms.. I am not disputing the power of compound interest or UT in general
My point is there are pros and cons and probably more cons than what ppl thought.
E.g. If we have a retiree-gonna-be, then this PRS income tax relief is a no brainer, since he is going to get his money back within a few years