QUOTE(simchengheng @ Aug 12 2013, 05:34 PM)
i do some readings, quite a lot actually..
found out VLR actually is most contribute to TSER under "Visible Light", is it true?
and the lower value of VLT, it helps for TSER also. and IRR actually is the rest of UV and Visible Light, means even 90%+ IRR, it only means that 90% of the Infra Red Light, which its not visible by human eyes and its only about half of solar energy.
kinda confuse to tinted specs, might be some sort of marketing. so if we are looking for very good heat rejection, gonna go for highest VLR, Lower VLT, Higher IRR? i am feeling like wanna ignore IRR as IRR ratings on different wave show different result, and we cannot confirm in what range of wave for the brand to post out their IRR value.
i am hearing many feedback that pro rating of IRR tint still not very good on heat rejection, while some tint with 85%+- did better than 90%++, 93%, or even 95%. all brand should have a guide line or standards for all those rating, and how the value being carry out.
To select the best heat rejection film, you have to determine the VLT that you want because it will affect the rest of the performance. For instant example,
We have
1. Spectrally selective window film means the film always have high VLT, Low VLR and High Rejection
For example, the spec will be 70% VLT, 8% VLR, 99% UV,0.5 SC and 55% TSER. This film is more suitable for automotive to meet up our JPJ rules.
2. Non spectrally selective window film means the film can have better performance by lower their VLT and increase
their VLR. For example, the spec will be 20% VLT, 50% VLR, 99% UV, 0.2 SC and 80% TSER. This will against the JPJ rules, thus it more suitable for architectural application.
Lets talk about IRR, this bit technical. We measure IRR in nanometer. In nanometer we measure
1. UV (0-380 nanometer)
2. VLT (380-780 nanometer)
3. IRR (780-up to 2400 nanometer)
For the 1st and 2nd reading, the measurement of nanometer is short, therefore the percentage is always 100% accurate, that's why most the windows film claim have 99% of UV rejection.
When come to IRR measurement, some of the windows film claim they have 95% IRR rejection but when tested with equipment such as 500 watt heat lamp, it burn faster than the one who claim have 90% IRR. This because the windows film that come IRR 95% take their IRR reading at 780-1000 nanometer or even lower. That where the films performs the best meanwhile the windows film that have 90% IRR have their reading at 780-2000 nanometer or even more. Read here for more
http://advancedfilmfl.net/files/72745-6383..._Rev0709_lo.pdfSome of the HOME BRAND do not have the accurate specification. They normally buy the windows film in bulk and rebrand or remodified the windows film with great specification to boost the sales. That's why important go for International Brand because we always send our product to lab testing and get verification.
This post has been edited by lonely143: Aug 12 2013, 08:50 PM