base on moslem POV, it is OK to do so, but certainly not to non moslem

20 years ago, those rules and regulations are non existence

religious authority started to meddling into enforcement agencies and that time, moslem reassure us that those rules and regulations will not affect the non moslem

and when the non moslem started to aware that their basic right has been violated by the religious inspired rules & regulations, we are told to shut up and accept it

non moslem terengganu should take it as a lesson. oppose now or you will forever be subjected to those religious inspired rules & regulations

so we gonna learn like America every state got different rules 

Actually it is demographic effect. Muslim population increasing every day. Next 10 years lagi teruk when 75% of malaysia population is muslim. We are democracy which following majority. Majority wull make the rule which minority like it or not need to follow.  So if you dont like stay away from majority muslim state and just stay at place lioke KL or Penang which muslim no so majority.

rules are ever changing. But Muslim community has always try to restrict male/female relationship.
even before Merdeka days.
Non muslims in Terengganu are free to vote for whomever they want.

that is my point

moslem should stop using "won't affect non moslem" statement to threaten or prohibit moslem on having a say on this type of issue

it beats the whole purpose of having a democracy system

it depends on what type of say. If you insist on wanting it not to apply to non-muslims. go ahead.
you want to vote on it?go ahead.

but if your fear of it being applied to non-muslims, you want it not applied to muslims also. Like that cannot.
because it should and does applies to muslims. and the muslims doesn't mind.

so you reckon that even if non moslem knew that those rules & regulations will eventually affect them, yet they should keep quiet about it?

wow, just wow

any legally non-muslims ever sentenced under shariah law in Malaysia?

apparently you choose to ignore my earlier examples

as of recent cases

unilateral child conversion issue

ninja joe incident

one the child was converted. and one of the parents converted.
so not all parties are non-muslims at the time of the issue.

even ninja joe also already agree to change their name.
no one go to jail also. they also no problem with it.
lucky doesn't get sued by Ramly group.

So who got charged in court again?

I am talking about being affected

aren't those examples that i given consider being affected?

anyway you have make up your mind not to see things on non moslem POV

so, i guess no point trying to make you understand non moslem concern

have a nice day